Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How to determine post-RCHOP therapy for risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, addition of maintenance rituximab or observation: multicenter experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

In international prognostic index (IPI) risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), it is still unclear whether the addition of maintenance rituximab (MR) improves progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), after RCHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone) therapy.

Methods

In our study, 207 patients (age: 21–59 years) received six 14-day cycles of RCHOP and gained overall response. After RCHOP, 98 patients were enrolled in the observation (OBS) arm. 109 patients continued to receive MR therapy.

Results

In IPI risk <2 profile, PFS at 5 years reached 72.9% (MR arm) versus 56% (OBS arm) (P = 0.033). In IPI risk ≥2 profile, PFS estimation at 5 years was 44.9% (MR arm) versus 33.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.006). It is noteworthy that patients with IPI ≥2 who received MR achieved PFS similar to that for patients in the OBS arm with the IPI <2, 44.9% versus 56% (P = 0.97). In patients with an IPI <2, OS at 5 years was 83.2% (MR arm) versus 81.2% (OBS arm) (P = 0.708). In patients with an IPI ≥2, 5-year OS estimation was 44.6% (MR arm) versus 40.5% (OBS arm) (P = 0.067). Subgroup analysis of patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile shows a survival benefit for patients receiving MR. OS at 5 years was 62% (MR arm) versus 49% (OBS arm), (P = 0.033).

Conclusions

In conclusion, maintenance rituximab after RCHOP improves progression-free survival. In addition, overall survival is improved for patients with an IPI ≥3 risk profile receiving MR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Benekli M, Hahn T, Shafi F, Qureshi A, Alam AR, Czuczman MS et al (2003) Effect of rituximab on peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and engraftment kinetics in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients. Bone Marrow Transpl 32:139–143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheson BD, Horning SJ, Coiffier B et al (1999) Report of an international workshop to standardize response criteria for non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 17:1244–1253

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb JA, Gutterman JU, McCredie KB, Rodriguez V, Frei E 3rd (1973) Chemotherapy of malignant lymphoma with adriamycin. Cancer Res 33:3024–3028

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Habermann TM, Weller EA, Morrison VA, Gascoyne RD, Cassileth PA, Cohn JB et al (2006) Rituximab-CHOP versus CHOP alone or with maintenance rituximab in older patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 24:3121–3127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harris NL, Jaffe ES, Diebold J, Flandrin G, Muller-Hermelink HK, Vardiman J et al (1999) World Health Organization classification of neoplastic disease of hematopoietic and lymphoid tissues: report of the Clinical Advisory Committee meeting—Airlie House, Virginia, November 1997. J Clin Oncol 17:3835–3849

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hochster H, Weller E, Gascoyne RD, Habermann TM, Gordon LI, Ryan T et al (2009) Maintenance rituximab after cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone prolongs progression-free survival in advanced indolent lymphoma: results of the randomized phase III ECOG1496 Study. J Clin Oncol 27:1607–1614

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Horwitz SM, Negrin RS, Blume KG, Breslin S, Stuart MJ, Stockerl-Goldstein KE et al (2004) Rituximab as adjuvant to high-dose therapy and autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation for aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Blood 103:777–783

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Josting A, Reiser M, Rueffer U, Salzberger B, Diehl V, Engert A (2000) Treatment of primary progressive Hodgkin’s and aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma: is there a chance for cure? J Clin Oncol 18:332–339

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kewalramani T, Zelenetz AD, Hedrick EE, Donnelly GB, Hunte S, Priovolos AC, Qin J, Lyons NC et al (2000) High-dose chemoradiotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation for patients with primary refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an intention-to-treat analysis. Blood 96:2399–2404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khouri IF, Saliba RM, Hosing C, Okoroji GJ, Acholonu S, Anderlini P et al (2005) Concurrent administration of high-dose rituximab before and after autologous stem-cell transplantation for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas. J Clin Oncol 23:2240–2247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koivula S, Valo E, Raunio A, Hautaniemi S, Leppä S (2011) Rituximab regulates signaling pathways and alters gene expression associated with cell death and survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncol Rep 25:1183–1190

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lister TA, Crowther D, Sutcliffe SB, Glatstein E, Canellos GP, Young RC et al (1989) Report of a committee convened to discuss the evaluation and staging of patients with Hodgkin’s disease: Cotswolds meeting. J Clin Oncol 7:1630–1636

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mark M, Cerny T (2010) New treatments of malignant lymphoma–a review. Ther Umsch 67:537–543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey EM, Gottlieb JA, Wilson HE et al (1976) Hydroxydaunomycin (adriamycin) combination chemotherapy in malignant lymphoma. Cancer 38:1484–1493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Miller TP, Dahlberg S, Cassady JR, Adelstein DJ, Spier CM, Grogan TM et al (1998) Chemotherapy alone compared with chemotherapy plus radiotherapy for localized intermediate- and high-grade non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 339:21–26

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moskowitz CH, Bertino JR, Glassman JR, Hedrick EE, Hunte S, Coady-Lyons N et al (1999) Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide: a highly effective cytoreduction and peripheral-blood progenitor-cell mobilization regimen for transplant-eligible patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 17:3776–3785

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Philip T, Guglielmi C, Hagenbeek A, Somers R, Van der Lelie H, Bron D et al (1995) Autologous bone marrow transplantation as compared with salvage chemotherapy in relapses of chemotherapy-sensitive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med 333:1540–1545

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Plosker GL, Figgitt DP (2003) Rituximab: a review of its use in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Drugs 63:803–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg S, Berard C, Brown B Jr, Burke J, Dorfman R, Glatstein E et al (1982) National Cancer Institute sponsored study of classifications of non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas: summary and description of a working formulation for clinical usage. The Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Pathologic Classification Project. Cancer 49:2112–2135

    Google Scholar 

  • Salles G, Seymour JF, Offner F, López-Guillermo A, Belada D, Xerri L et al (2011) Rituximab maintenance for 2 years in patients with high tumour burden follicular lymphoma responding to rituximab plus chemotherapy (PRIMA): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 377:42–51

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shipp MA, Harrington DP (1993) A predictive model for aggressive NHL: the international non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma prognostic factors project. N Engl J Med 329:987–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vose JM, Zhang MJ, Rowlings PA, Lazarus HM, Bolwell BJ, Freytes CO et al (2001) Autologous transplantation for diffuse aggressive non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma in patients never achieving remission: a report from the autologous blood and marrow transplant registry. J Clin Oncol 19:406–413

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ziepert M, Hasenclever D, Kuhnt E, Glass B, Schmitz N, Pfreundschuh M et al (2010) Standard International prognostic index remains a valid predictor of outcome for patients with aggressive CD20+ B-cell lymphoma in the rituximab era. J Clin Oncol 28:2373–2380

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the patients and the clinicians from the participating sites. Jessica Yu supported the substantial English revision. This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (200711020952) and Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province Grant (10151600301). All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described was original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bin-Tao Huang.

Additional information

Bin-Tao Huang and Qing-Chun Zeng equally contributed to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, BT., Zeng, QC., Yu, J. et al. How to determine post-RCHOP therapy for risk-tailored adult patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, addition of maintenance rituximab or observation: multicenter experience. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138, 125–132 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-011-1074-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-011-1074-1

Keywords

Navigation