Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Clinical significance of reconstruction of the right hepatic artery for biliary malignancy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background and aims

The clinical significance of resectional surgery with reconstruction of the right hepatic artery for biliary malignancy remains unclear.

Patients/methods

Between 1990 and 2004, six patients (5%) with cholangiocarcinoma and five patients (3%) with gallbladder carcinoma with possible involvement of the right hepatic artery underwent resectional surgery with reconstruction of the right-sided hepatic artery. The surgical procedures included extended left hemihepatectomy (n=4), left trisectionectomy (n=1), central bisegmentectomy (n=1), resection of anterior segment and inferior area of segment 4 (n=2), resection of segment 5 and inferior area of segment 4 (n=1), and extrahepatic bile duct resection (n=2). Segmental resection and reconstruction of the right (n=7), anterior (n=1), or posterior (n=3) hepatic artery was performed by end-to-end anastomosis (n=5), using the right gastroepiploic artery (n=4), the gastroduodenal artery (n=1), or an autologous venous graft (n=1).

Results

There was no in-hospital mortality. Histopathological arterial involvement was present in seven patients, and the surgical margin was positive in five patients. The median survival was 23 months in R0 patients (n=6), while it was 13 months in R1 patients (n=5) (p=0.16).

Conclusion

Reconstruction of the right hepatic artery was safely performed in patients with biliary malignancy. Arterial reconstruction can be indicated when the arterial involvement is the only obstacle to obtain negative surgical margins.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Makuuchi M, Bandai Y, Ito T, Wada T (1980) Ultrasonically guided percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography and percutaneous pancreatography. Radiology 134:767–770

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Nimura Y, Kamiya J, Kondo S, Nagino M, Kanai M (1995) Technique of inserting multiple biliary drains and management. Hepatogastroenterol 42:323–331

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Makuuchi M, Thai BL, Takayasu K, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Gunven P, Yamazaki S, Hasegawa H, Ozaki H (1990) Preoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report. Surgery 107:521–527

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kosuge T, Yamamoto J, Shimada K, Yamasaki S, Makuuchi M (1999) Improved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection. Ann Surg 230:663–671

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Neuhaus P, Jonas S, Bechstein WO, Lohmann R, Radke C, Kling N, Wex C, Lobeck H, Hintze R (1999) Extended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Ann Surg 230:808–819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawasaki S, Imamura H, Kobayashi A, Noie T, Miwa S, Miyagawa S (2003) Results of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer. Application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization. Ann Surg 238:84–92

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Seyama Y, Kubota K, Sano K, Noie T, Takayama T, Kosuge T, Makuuchi M (2003) Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate. Ann Surg 238:73–83

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Okushiba S, Morikawa T, Katoh H (2004) Forty consecutive resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins. Results of a prospective study. Ann Surg 240:95–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marcos A, Killackey M, Orloff MS, Mieles S, Bozorgzadeh A, Tan HP (2003) Hepatic arterial reconstruction in 95 adult right lobe living donor liver transplants: evolution of anastomotic technique. Liver Transpl 9:570–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarmiento JM, Panneton JM, Nagorney DM (2003) Reconstruction of the hepatic artery using the gastroduodenal artery. Am J Surg 185:386–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kusano T, Furukawa M, Nakata T, Kusaba E, Yamauchi H, Tsukasa T, Tsuchiya R (1990) Hepatic artery reconstruction grafting with the right gastroepiploic artery for surgical treatment of upper bile duct cancer. J Jpn Surg Soc 91:1749–1751, (in Japanese)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ikegami T, Kawasaki S, Hashikura Y, Miwa S, Kubota T, Mita A, Iijima S, Terada M, Miyagawa S, Furuta S (2000) An alternative method of arterial reconstruction after hepatic arterial thrombosis following living-related liver transplantation. Transplantation 699:1953–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Figueras J, Pares D, Aranda H, Rafecase A, Fabregat J, Torras J, Ramos E, Lama C, Llado L, Jaurrieta E (1997) Results of using the recipient’s splenic artery for arterial reconstruction in liver transplantation in 23 patients. Transplantation 64:655–658

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sakamoto Y, Takayama T, Nakatsuka T, Asano H, Sugawara Y, Sano K, Imamura H, Kawarasaki H, Makuuchi M (2002) Advantage in using living donors with aberrant hepatic artery for partial liver graft arterialization. Transplantation 74:518–521

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Miyazaki M, Ito H, Nakagawa K, Ambiru S, Shimizu H, Yoshidome H, Shimizu Y, Okaya T, Mitsuhashi N, Wakabayashi Y, Nakajima N (2000) Unilateral hepatic artery reconstruction in unnecessary in biliary tract carcinomas involving lobar hepatic artery: Implications of interlobar hepatic artery and its preservation. Hepatogastroenterol 47:1526–1530

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Miyake H, Tashiro S, Fujii M, Sasaki K, Takagai T (2004) Efficacy of only left side approach in a case of unsuccessful reconstruction of the right hepatic artery after left hepatic lobectomy with caudate lobectomy. Hepatogastroenterol 51:372–374

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kondo S, Hirano S, Ambo Y, Tanaka E, Kubota T, Katoh H (2004) Arterioportal shunting as an alternative to microvascular reconstruction after hepatic artery reconstruction. Br J Surg 91:248–251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Shimada H, Endo I, Sugita M, Masunari H, Fujii Y, Tanaka K, Misuta K, Sekido H, Togo S (2003) Hepatic resection combined with portal vein or hepatic artery reconstruction for advanced carcinoma of the hilar bile duct and gallbladder. World J Surg 27:1137–1142

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ebata T, Nagino M, Kamiya J, Uesaka K, Nagasaka T, Nimura Y (2003) Hepatectomy with portal vein resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Audit of 52 consecutive cases. Ann Surg 238:720–727

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nimura Y, Hayakawa N, Kamiya J, Maeda S, Kondo S, Yasui A, Shionoya S (1991) Combined portal vein and liver resection for carcinoma of the biliary tract. Br J Surg 78:727–731

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yamanaka N, Yasui C, Yamanaka J, Ando T, Kuroda N, Maeda S, Ito T, Okamoto E (2001) Left hemihepatectomy with microsurgical reconstruction of the right-sided hepatic vasculature. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg 386:364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, and the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yoshihiro Sakamoto.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sakamoto, Y., Sano, T., Shimada, K. et al. Clinical significance of reconstruction of the right hepatic artery for biliary malignancy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 391, 203–208 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0026-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-006-0026-8

Keywords

Navigation