Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Dental superimposition: a pilot study for standardising the method

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
International Journal of Legal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dental superimposition is becoming more and more important because of the increasing number of illegal immigrants (at least in Italy), with no clinical history, no personal effects or relatives useful for genetic comparison, whose friends and acquaintances can usually only produce photographs. Very few authors have been involved in devising and using this method. The goal of the present study is to establish whether it is possible, and under which conditions, to identify individuals by dental superimposition of teeth visible in an ante-mortem photograph and dental casts of an unidentified body, and to develop a protocol for the spatial orientation analysis of the dentition and qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis of superimpositions. A non-mathematical scoring system has been applied to each superimposition as a first step towards the optimisation of a cheap, quick, semi-quantitative method of identifying individuals when other more used methods are not applicable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. McKenna JJI, Jablonski NG, Fearnhead RW (1984) A method of matching skulls with photographic portraits using landmarks and measurements of the dentition. J Forensic Sci 29:787–797

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aulsebrook WA, Iscan MY, Slabbert JH, Becker P (1995) Superimposition and reconstruction in forensic facial identification: a survey. Forensic Sci Int 75:101–120

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sekharan P, Pesce Delfino V, Seta S, Yoshino M (1993) In: Iscan MY, Helmer R (eds) Skull-photo superimposition. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 105–182

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yoshino M, Matsuda H, Kubota S, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka S, Seta S (1997) Computer-assisted skull identification system using video superimposition. Forensic Sci Int 90:231–244

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown KA (1983) Developments in craniofacial superimposition for identification. J Forensic Odonto-Stomatol 1:57–64

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klonaris NS, Furue T (1980) Photographic superimposition in dental identification. Is a picture worth a thousand words? J Forensic Sci 25:859–865

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. McKenna JJI (1986) A qualitative and quantitative analysis of the anterior dentition visible in photographs and its application to forensic odontology. Master Thesis, Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong

  8. McKenna JJI (1988) A method of orientation of skull and camera for use in forensic photographic investigation. J Forensic Sci 33:751–755

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McKenna JJI, Fearnhead RW (1992) Identification by photographic superimposition. In: Clarck DH (ed) Practical forensic odontology. Wright, London, pp 67–78

    Google Scholar 

  10. Koelrneyer TD (1982) Videocamera superimposition and facial reconstruction as an aid to identification. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 3:45–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bastiaan RJ, Dalitz GD, Woodward C (1986) Video superimposition of skulls and photographic portraits. A new aid to identification. J Forensic Sci 31:1373–1379

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yoshino M, Imaizumi K, Miyasaka M, Seta S (1995) Evaluation of anatomical consistency in craniofacial superimposition images. Forensic Sci Int 74:125–134

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nickerson BA, Fitzhorn PA, Koch SK, Chamey M (1991) A methodology for near-optimal computational superimposition of two-dimensional digital facial photographs and three-dimensional cranial surface meshes. J Forensic Sci 36:480–500

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ubelaker DH, Bubniak E, O’Donnell G (1992) Computer-assisted photographic superimposition. J Forensic Sci 37:750–762

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pesce Delfino V, Colonna M, Vacca E, Potente F, Introna F (1986) Computer-aided skull/face superimposition. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 7:201–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Cattaneo C, Ritz-Timme S, SSchutz HW, Collins M, Waite E, Bormann H, Grandi M, Kaatsch HJ (2000) Unidentified cadavers and human remains in EU: an unknown issue. Int J Legal Med 113(3):2–3

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cattaneo C (2007) Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium. Forensic Sci Int 165:185–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Baccino E (2005) Forensic Anthropology Society of Europe (FASE), a sbusection of the IALM, is 1 year old. Int J Legal Med 119:N1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Braga J, Heuze Y, Chabadel O, Sonan NK, Gueramy A (2005) Non-adult dental age assessment: correspondence analysis and linear regression versus Bayesian predictions. Int J Legal Med 119(5):260–275

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Prieto JL, Barbería E, Ortega R, Magaña C (2005) Evaluation of chronological age based on third molar development in the Spanish population. Int J Legal Med 109(6):349–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Cingolani M (2006) Age estimation in children by measurement of open apices in teeth. Int J Legal Med 120(1):49–52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Iten PX (1987) Identification of skulls by video superimposition. J Forensic Sci 32:173–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Yoshino M, Seta S (1982) Personal identification of human skull: superimposition and radiographic techniques. Forensic Sci Rev 1:23–42

    Google Scholar 

  24. Austin-Smith D, Maples WR (1994) The reliability of skull photograph superimposition in individual identification. J Forensic Sci 39:446–455

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sweet D, Bowers CM (1998) Accuracy of bite mark overlays: a comparison of five common methods to produce exemplars from a suspect’s dentition. J Forensic Sci 43(2):362–367

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Sweet D, Parhar M, Wood RE (1998) Computer-based production of bite mark comparison overlays. J Forensic Sci 43(5):1050–1055

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Pretty IA (2003) A web-based survey of odontologist’s opinions concerning bitemark analyses. J Forensic Sci 48(5):1117–1120

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. LabAnOF, Laboratorio di Antropologia ed Odontologia Forense, Istituto di Medicina Legale, Università degli Studi, Via Mangiagalli 37, 20133, Milano, Italy

    D. De Angelis, C. Cattaneo & M. Grandi

Authors
  1. D. De Angelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. Cattaneo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Grandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Cattaneo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

De Angelis, D., Cattaneo, C. & Grandi, M. Dental superimposition: a pilot study for standardising the method. Int J Legal Med 121, 501–506 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0198-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-007-0198-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation