Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Tumor Type Influences the Effectiveness of Pleurodesis in Malignant Effusions

  • Published:
Lung Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pleurodesis is commonly indicated for symptom relief in patients with malignant pleural effusions. A number of factors may influence pleurodesis outcome, but whether tumor type is one of them is a matter of debate. This study investigates the impact of tumor type on the efficacy of bedside doxycycline and thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis in order to determine which patients may benefit most from these procedures. A retrospective study of 138 and 450 doxycycline and talc poudrage pleurodesis procedures, respectively, evaluated their overall successes and failures, according to primary tumor types. In addition, a logistic regression model addressed whether the pleurodesis outcome in different tumor types was influenced by or attributable to pleural tumor burden. In the talc group, patients with lung cancer and mesothelioma had significantly lower complete response rates (63 and 61%, respectively) as compared with breast (77%) and other metastatic effusions (74%, p = 0.012). In the doxycycline group, the data followed the same trend in that complete response rates were lower in patients with lung carcinomas (31%) than in those with breast cancer (54%) or metastases from other primary sites (74%, p = 0.001). The regression analysis showed pleural burden and tumor type as independent predictors of pleurodesis failure in the talc group. The tumor type involving the pleural surfaces influences the success of a pleurodesis, regardless of the sclerosing agent used. Malignant effusions due to mesothelioma and lung cancer are particularly prone to a failed procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antony VB, Loddenkemper R, Astoul P, Boutin C, Goldstraw P, Hott J, Rodríguez-Panadero F, Sahn SA (2000) Management of malignant pleural effusions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 162:1987–2001

    Google Scholar 

  2. Neragi-Miandoab S (2008) Surgical and other invasive approaches to recurrent pleural effusion with malignant etiology. Support Care Cancer 16:1323–1331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Light RW, Lee YCG (eds) (2008) Textbook of pleural diseases, 2nd edn. Hodder Arnold, London

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burrows CM, Mathews WC, Colt HG (2000) Predicting survival in patients with recurrent symptomatic malignant pleural effusions: an assessment of the prognostic values of physiologic, morphologic, and quality of life measures of extent of disease. Chest 117:73–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolschmann S, Ballin A, Gillissen A (2005) Clinical efficacy and safety of thoracoscopic talc pleurodesis in malignant pleural effusions. Chest 128:1431–1435

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Viallat JR, Rey F, Astoul P, Boutin C (1996) Thoracoscopic talc poudrage pleurodesis for malignant effusions. A review of 360 cases. Chest 110:1387–1393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Porcel JM, Salud A, Nabal M, Vives M, Esquerda A, Rodríguez-Panadero F (2006) Rapid pleurodesis with doxycycline through a small-bore catheter for the treatment of metastatic malignant effusions. Support Care Cancer 14:475–478

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Porcel JM, Rodriguez-Panadero F (2009) Malignant effusions. In: Maskell N, Millar A (eds) Oxford desk reference respiratory medicine. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 342–345

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rodríguez-Panadero F, Antony VA (2002) Therapeutic local procedures: pleurodesis. Eur Respir Mon 7:311–326

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sánchez-Armengol A, Rodríguez-Panadero F (1993) Survival and talc pleurodesis in metastatic pleural carcinoma, revisited. Report of 125 cases. Chest 104:1482–1485

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Campos JR, Vargas FS, de Campos Werebe E, Cardoso P, Teixeira LR, Jatene FB, Light RW (2001) Thoracoscopy talc poudrage. A 15-years experience. Chest 119:801–806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Barbetakis N, Asteriou C, Papadopoulou F, Samanidis G, Paliouras D, Kleontas A, Lyriti K, Katsikas I, Tsilikas C (2010) Early and late morbidity and mortality and life expectancy following thoracoscopic talc insufflation for control of malignant pleural effusions: a review of 400 cases. J Cardiothorac Surg 5:27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stefani A, Natali P, Casali C, Morandi U (2006) Talc poudrage versus talc slurry in the treatment of malignant pleural effusion. A prospective comparative study. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 30:827–832

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Aydogmus U, Ozdemir S, Cansever L, Sonmezoglu Y, Kocaturk CI, Bedirhan MA (2009) Bedside talc pleurodesis for malignant pleural effusion: factors affecting success. Ann Surg Oncol 16:745–750

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Roberts ME, Neville E, Berrisford RG, Antunes G, Ali NJ (2010) Management of a malignant pleural effusion: British Thoracic Society pleural disease guideline 2010. Thorax 65(Suppl 2):ii32–ii40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bielsa S, Salud A, Martínez M, Esquerda A, Martín A, Rodríguez-Panadero F, Porcel JM (2008) Prognostic significance of pleural fluid data in patients with malignant effusion. Eur J Intern Med 19:334–339

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José M. Porcel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bielsa, S., Hernández, P., Rodriguez-Panadero, F. et al. Tumor Type Influences the Effectiveness of Pleurodesis in Malignant Effusions. Lung 189, 151–155 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9283-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00408-011-9283-6

Keywords

Navigation