Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intimacy and sexuality problems are underreported in head and neck cancer patients. The aim of this study was to collate the various prompts available in a routine follow-up clinic through the use of an intimacy screening question and Patient’s Concerns Inventory (PCI), and to identify how often these problems were raised by patients and what possible actions took place as a consequence. 177 patients completed the intimacy screening question, PCI and UW-QOLv.4 at follow-up clinics, from October 2008 to January 2011. Case note review identified if intimacy was mentioned in clinic letters and if referral for support was made. On the intimacy screening question, 15 % (26) reported problems of considerable/some concern (24) or selected intimacy/sexuality on the PCI (2). The PCI identified that 9 of the 24 reporting the worst problems wanted the topic discussed in clinic, and clinic letters suggested that 5 of these discussed the issue in clinic with 4 being referred on, 3 to a clinical psychologist and 1 to a clinical nurse specialist. Intimacy problems are underreported in clinic reviews. It is a difficult subject to discuss. It will remain a potential unmet need unless attempts are made to advance the opportunities for patient screening, information leaflets, staff training on how to talk about such sensitive issues and referral for counselling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Payakachat N, Ounpraseuth S, Suen JY (2013) Late complications and long-term quality of life for survivors (> 5 years) with history of head and neck cancer. Head Neck 35:819–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sayed SI, Elmiyeh B, Rhys-Evans P, Syrigos KN, Nutting CM, Harrington KJ, Kazi R (2009) Quality of life and outcomes research in head and neck cancer: a review of the state of the discipline and likely future directions. Cancer Treat Rev 35:397–402

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Low C, Fullarton M, Parkinson E, O’Brien K, Jackson SR, Lowe D, Rogers SN (2009) Issues of intimacy and sexual dysfunction following major head and neck cancer treatment. Oral Oncol 45:898–903

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Brien K, Roe B, Low C, Deyn L, Rogers SN (2012) An exploration of the perceived changes in intimacy of patients’ relationships following head and neck cancer. J Clin Nurs 21:2499–2508

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Manne S, Badr H, Kashy DA (2012) A longitudinal analysis of intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. J Behav Med 35:334–346

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Manne S, Badr H (2010) Intimacy processes and psychological distress among couples coping with head and neck or lung cancers. Psychooncology 19:941–954

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Manne S (2011) Restoring intimacy in relationships affected by cancer. Curr Clin Urol 5:739–750

    Google Scholar 

  8. Reese JB (2011) Coping with sexual concerns after cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 23:313–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, Patiraki E (2009) Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of sexual health care in patients with cancer: critical review of the evidence. Support Care Cancer 17:479–501

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ratner ES, Foran KA, Schwartz PE, Minkin MJ (2010) Sexuality and intimacy after gynecological cancer. Maturitas 66:23–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beck AM, Robinson JW, Carlson LE (2009) Sexual intimacy in heterosexual couples after prostate cancer treatment: what we know and what we still need to learn. Urol Oncol 27:137–143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krychman ML, Katz A (2012) Breast cancer and sexuality: multi-modal treatment options. J Sex Med 9:5–13

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee YK, Chung HH, Kim JW, Park NH, Song YS, Kang SB (2011) Vaginal pH-balanced gel for the control of atrophic vaginitis among breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 117:922–927

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF (1999) Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the EORTC H&N35. J Clin Oncol 17:1008–1019

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Funk GF, Karnell LH, Christensen AJ, Moran PJ, Ricks J (2003) Comprehensive head and neck oncology health status assessment. Head Neck 25:561–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. List MA, D’Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D et al (1996) The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck scale. A study of utility and validity. Cancer 77:2294–2301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rogers SN, El-Sheikha J, Lowe D (2009) The development of a Patients Concerns Inventory (PCI) to help reveal patients concerns in the head and neck clinic. Oral Oncol 45:555–561

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rogers SN, Gwane S, Lowe D, Humphris G, Yueh B, Weymuller EA (2002) The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington Quality of Life Scale. Head Neck 24:521–529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rogers SN, Lowe D, Yueh B, Weymuller EA (2010) The physical function and social-emotional function subscales of the University of Washington Quality of Life questionnaire (UW-QOL). Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 136:352–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reese JB, Shelby RA, Abernethy AP (2011) Sexual concerns in lung cancer patients: an examination of predictors and moderating effects of age and gender. Support Care Cancer 19:161–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lindau ST, Schumm LP, Laumann EO, Levinson W, O’Muircheartaigh CA, Waite LJ (2007) A study of sexuality and health among older adults in the United States. N Engl J Med 357:762–774

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Laumann EO, Nicolosi A, Glasser DB, Paik A, Gingell C, Moreira E et al (2005) Sexual problems among women and men aged 40–80 y: prevalence and correlates identified in the global study of sexual attitudes and behaviours. Int J Impot Res 17:39–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Romito F, Corvasce C, Montanaro R, Mattioli V (2011) Do elderly cancer patients have different care needs compared with younger ones? Tumori 97:374–379

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yurek D, Farrar W, Andersen BL (2000) Breast cancer surgery: comparing surgical groups and determining individual differences in postoperative sexuality and body change stress. J Consult Clin Psychol 68:697–709

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Flynn KE, Jeffery DD, Keefe FJ, Porter LS, Shelby RA, Fawzy MR, Gosselin TK, Reeve BB, Weinfurt KP (2011) Sexual functioning along the cancer continuum: focus group results from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®). Psychooncology 20:378–386

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brotto LA, Yule M, Breckon E (2010) Psychological interventions for the sexual sequelae of cancer: a review of the literature. J Cancer Surviv 4:346–360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Rogers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rogers, S.N., Hazeldine, P., O’Brien, K. et al. How often do head and neck cancer patients raise concerns related to intimacy and sexuality in routine follow-up clinics?. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 272, 207–217 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2971-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-014-2971-0

Keywords

Navigation