Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Results of selective neck dissection in the primary management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

  • Head and Neck
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selective neck dissection (SND) is known to be a valid procedure to stage the clinically N0 neck but its reliability to control metastatic neck disease remains controversial. This study analysed if selective neck dissection is a reliable procedure to prevent regional metastatic disease in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We retrospectively analysed the medical records of 163 previously untreated patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx and hypopharynx treated initially in our departement from January 1990 to December 2002. All patients had unilateral or bilateral SND, in combination with surgical resection of the primary tumour. SND was performed in 281 necks. Finally, 146 patients who underwent 249 SND (39 I–III, I–IV, 210 II–IV, II–V) had adequate follow-up and were assessed for the regional control. The median follow-up was 37 months (1–180 months). The end points of the study were neck control following SND and overall survival. Twenty-five percent (30/119) of patients staged cN0 had lymph node (LN) metastasis. Overall, regional recurrence was observed in 2.8% of the necks (7/249): 1.6% (4/249) in dissected field and 1.2% (3/249) in undissected field. Seventy-eight percent (194/249) of the necks were staged pN0 with a subsequent failure rate of 1.5% (3/194); 16% (39/249) were staged pN1 and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) was proposed in 21 of these patients. The failure rate with PORT was 9.5% and 5.5% without PORT. Six percent (16/249) of the necks were staged pN2b and all had PORT with one subsequent recurrence. Extracapsular spread (ECS) was reported in 16.5% of positive SND specimens (9/55); all by one were treated by PORT with a subsequent failure rate of 22% (2/9). At 3 years, overall survival for the whole population was 70% and statistically highly correlated with pN stage (p<0.001). These results support the reliability of SND to stage the clinically N0 neck. SND is a definitive operation not only in pN0 but also in most pN1 and pN2b necks. PORT is not justified in pN1 neck without ECS. In pN2b necks, the low rate of recurrence supports adjuvant PORT. The presence of ECS, despite adjuvant PORT, remains associated with a higher risk of recurrence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Andersen PE, Shah JP, Cambronero E, Spiro RH (1994) The role of comprehensive neck dissection with preservation of the spinal accessory nerve in the clinically positive neck. Am J Surg 168:499–492. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80110-2

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bataini JP, Bernier J, Brugere J, Jaulerry C, Picco C, Brunin F (1985) Natural history of neck disease in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx and pharyngolarynx. Radiother Oncol 3:245–255. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(85)80033-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bernier J (2005) Alteration of radiotherapy fractionation and concurrent chemotherapy: a new frontier in head and neck oncology? Nat Clin Pract Oncol 2:305–314. doi:10.1038/ncponc0201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brazilian Head and Neck Cancer Study Group (1998) Results of a prospective trial on elective modified radical classical versus supraomohyoid neck dissection in the management of oral squamous carcinoma. Am J Surg 176:422–427. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(98)00230-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Byers RM (1985) Modified neck dissection. A study of 967 cases from 1970 to 1980. Am J Surg 150:414–421. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(85)90146-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Byers RM, Wolf PF, Ballantyne AJ (1988) Rationale for elective modified neck dissection. Head Neck Surg 10:160–167. doi:10.1002/hed.2890100304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Byers RM, Clayman GL, McGill D, Andrews T, Kare RP, Roberts DB et al (1999) Selective neck dissections for squamous carcinoma of the upper aerodigestive tract: patterns of regional failure. Head Neck 21:499–495. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199909)21:6<499::AID-HED1>3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Candela FC, Kothari K, Shah JP (1990) Patterns of cervical node metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the oropharynx and hypopharynx. Head Neck 12:197–203. doi:10.1002/hed.2880120302

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Candela FC, Shah J, Jaques DP, Shah JP (1990) Patterns of cervical node metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the larynx. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 116:432–435

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dias FL, Kligerman J, Matos de Sá G, Arcuri RA, Freitas EQ, Farias T et al (2001) Elective neck dissection versus observation in stage I squamous cell carcinomas of the tongue and floor of the mouth. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 125:23–29. doi:10.1067/mhn.2001.116188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Duvvuri U, Simental AA Jr, D’Angelo G, Johnson JT, Ferns RL, Gooding W et al (2004) Elective neck dissection and survival in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity and oropharynx. Laryngoscope 114:2228–2234. doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000149464.73080.20

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ferlito A, Rinaldo A, Robbins KT, Leemans CR, Shah JP, Shaha AR et al (2003) Changing concepts in the surgical management of the surgical lymph node metastasis. Oral Oncol 39:429–435. doi:10.1016/S1368-8375(03)00010-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Greenberg JS, El Naggar AK, Mo V, Roberts D, Myers JN (2003) Disparity in pathologic and clinical lymph node staging in oral tongue carcinoma. Implication for therapeutic decision making. Cancer 98:508–515. doi:10.1002/cncr.11526

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Grégoire V, Coche E, Cosnard G, Hamoir M, Reychler H (2000) Selection and delineation of lymph node target volumes in head and neck conformal radiotherapy. Proposal for standardizing terminology and procedure based on the surgical experience. Radiother Oncol 56:135–150. doi:10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00202-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Grégoire V, Levendag P, Ang KK, Bernier J, Braaksma M, Budach V et al (2003) CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC, RTOG consensus guidelines. Radiother Oncol 69:227–236. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2003.09.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jesse RH, Ballantyne AJ, Larson D (1978) Radical or modified neck dissection: a therapeutic dilemma. Am J Surg 136:516–519. doi:10.1016/0002-9610(78)90273-8

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Kaya S, Yilmaz T, Gürsel B, Saraç S, Sennaroglù L (2001) The value of elective neck dissection in treatment of cancer of the tongue. Am J Otolaryngol 22:59–64. doi:10.1053/ajot.2001.20681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kowalski LP, Magrin J, Waksman G, Santo GF, Lopes ME, De Paula RP et al (1993) Supraomohyoid neck dissection in the treatment of head and neck tumors. Survival results in 212 cases. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 119:958–963

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lindberg R (1972) Distribution of cervical lymph node metastases from squamous cell carcinoma of the upper respiratory and digestive tracts. Cancer 29:1446–1449. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197206)29:6<1446::AID-CNCR2820290604>3.0.CO;2-C

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Lingeman RE, Helmus C, Stephens R, Ulm J (1977) Neck dissection: radical or conservative. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 86:737–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Medina JE, Byers RM (1989) Supraomohyoid neck dissection: rationale, indications, and surgical technique. Head Neck 11:111–122. doi:10.1002/hed.2880110203

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Pellitteri PK, Robbins KT, Neuman T (1997) Expanded application of selective neck dissection with regard to nodal status. Head Neck 19:260–265. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199707)19:4<260::AID-HED3>3.0.CO;2-Z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Pitman KT, Johnson JT, Myers EN (1997) Effectiveness of selective neck dissection for management of the clinically negative neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 123:917–922

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Shah JP (1990) Patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinomas of the upper aerodigestive tract. Am J Surg 160:405–409. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80554-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah JP, Candela FC, Poddar AK (1990) The patterns of cervical lymph node metastasis from squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity. Cancer 66:109–113. doi:10.1002/1097-0142(19900701)66:1<109::AID-CNCR2820660120>3.0.CO;2-A

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Spiro JD, Spiro RH, Shah JP, Sessions RB, Sheng EW (1988) Critical assessment of supraomohyoid neck dissection. Am J Surg 156:286–289. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(88)80293-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Spiro RH, Morgan GJ, Strong EW (1996) Supraomohyoid neck dissection. Am J Surg 172:650–653. doi:10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00300-5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weiss MH, Harrison LB, Isaacs RS (1994) Use of decision analysis in planning a management strategy for the N0 neck. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 120:699–692

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Head and Neck Surgery, Head and Neck Oncology Program, St Luc University Hospital and Cancer Center, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue Hippocrate, 10, 1200, Brussels, Belgium

    Sandra Schmitz & Marc Hamoir

  2. Department of Oncology, Head and Neck Oncology Program, St Luc University Hospital and Cancer Center, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

    Jean-Pascal Machiels

  3. Department of Pathology, Head and Neck Oncology Program, St Luc University Hospital and Cancer Center, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

    Birgit Weynand

  4. Department of Radiation Oncology, Head and Neck Oncology Program, St Luc University Hospital and Cancer Center, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium

    Vincent Gregoire

Authors
  1. Sandra Schmitz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Pascal Machiels
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Birgit Weynand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vincent Gregoire
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Marc Hamoir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Schmitz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schmitz, S., Machiels, JP., Weynand, B. et al. Results of selective neck dissection in the primary management of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 266, 437–443 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0767-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-008-0767-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation