Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Estimating the impact of pelvic immaturity and young maternal age on fetal malposition

  • Maternal-Fetal Medicine
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

Fetal malposition, specifically occiput posterior and transverse (OP/OT), is associated with higher intra-partum morbidity. We tested the hypothesis that young maternal age and pelvic immaturity are risk factors for fetal malposition.

Methods

In a cohort study of all nulliparous teen (≤18 years) deliveries over a 4-year period at one institution, fetal head position at time of delivery was collected and correlated with maternal characteristics and outcome data. Using Risser staging observations, pelvic maturity age was set at 16, and accordingly, the women were divided into two groups (younger vs. older teens). Analysis was performed using Fisher’s exact, student t test, and logistic regression modeling.

Results

Older teen mothers (16–18 years, n = 609) had higher rates of malposition (22 vs. 12 %, p = 0.02) when compared with younger teens (≤15 years, n = 98). Among all women with a malpositioned fetus, older teens had a higher body mass index (BMI: 32.6 ± 6.7 vs. 28.5 ± 3.5, p = 0.04) and subsequent need for cesarean delivery (69 vs. 33 %, p = 0.02) when compared with their younger counterparts. Although younger teens were more successful in having a vaginal delivery (67 %) with an OP/OT position, it was at the expense of a 25 % rate of severe perineal laceration (third/fourth degree).

Conclusion

Obesity, and not young maternal age or pelvic immaturity, is associated with fetal malposition. The direct association with increasing pre-pregnancy BMI and the long-term impacts of the high rates of cesarean delivery in this young population underscores the need for more public health focus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Haeri S, Guichard I, Baker AM, Saddlemire S, Boggess KA (2009) The effect of teenage maternal obesity on perinatal outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 113(2):300–304

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Goldberg RL, Klerman LV (1995) Adolescent pregnancy-another look. N Engl J Med 332:1161–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fraser AM, Brockert JE, Ward RH (1995) Association of young maternal age with adverse reproductive outcomes. N Engl J Med 332:1113–1117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ponkey SE, Cohen AP, Heffner LJ, Lieberman E (2003) Persistent fetal occiput posterior position: obstetric outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 101(5 Pt 1):915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng YW, Shaffer BL, Caughey AB (2006) Associated factors and outcomes of persistent occiput posterior position: a retrospective cohort study from 1976 to 2001. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 19(9):563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Floberg J, Belfrage P, Ohlsén H (1987) Influence of the pelvic outlet capacity on fetal head presentation at delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 66(2):127

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Risser JC (1958) The iliac apophysis: an invaluable sign in the management of scoliosis. Clin Orthop 11:111–119

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hoppenfeld S, Lonner B, Murthy V (2003) The rib epiphysis and other growth centers as indicators of the end of spinal growth. Spine 29:47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Modi HN, Modi CH, Suh SW, Yang JH, Hong JY (2009) Correlation and comparison of Risser sign versus bone age determination (TW3) between children with and without scoliosis in Korean population. J Orthop Surg Res 4:36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardberg M, Laakkonen E, Sälevaara M (1998) Intrapartum sonography and persistent occiput posterior position: a study of 408 deliveries. Obstet Gynecol 91:746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Peregrine E, O’Brien P, Jauniaux E (2007) Impact on delivery outcome of ultrasonographic fetal head position prior to induction of labor. Obstet Gynecol 109:618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Le Ray C, Carayol M, Jaquemin S (2005) Is epidural analgesia a risk factor for occiput posterior or transverse positions during labour? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 123:22

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lieberman E, Davidson K, Lee-Parritz A, Shearer E (2005) Changes in fetal position during labor and their association with epidural analgesia. Obstet Gynecol 105:974

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

We declare we have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sina Haeri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haeri, S., Baker, A.M. Estimating the impact of pelvic immaturity and young maternal age on fetal malposition. Arch Gynecol Obstet 286, 581–584 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2345-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2345-z

Keywords

Navigation