Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Obstetric morbidity and the diagnostic dilemma in pregnancy in rudimentary horn: retrospective analysis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Pregnancy in rudimentary horn of uterus, a form of ectopic gestation, is associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. Despite the recent advances in the ultrasonography, diagnosis of cornual pregnancy still remains elusive; with confirmatory diagnosis usually made during laparotomy. The aim of the present study is to analyze the obstetric implications and the diagnostic dilemma of rudimentary horn pregnancy.

Materials and methods

Records of women diagnosed with ectopic pregnancy in the rudimentary horn, during the years 2004 to 2008, managed in a referral hospital in northern India; were reviewed for their diagnostic difficulties and the associated morbidity.

Results

During the four year study period, rudimentary horn pregnancies accounted for 12 pregnancies. Non communicating horn accounted for 75% of the cases. The mean age of women at presentation was 26 ± 5.11 years and the period of gestation at diagnosis varied between 10 and 34 weeks. Preruputure diagnosis was possible only in two cases and sensitivity of ultrasonographic diagnosis was 33.3%. Laprotomy with excision of rudimentary horn and salpingectomy was done in all cases. Multiple blood transfusions were required in 83.3% of women.

Conclusion

Management of pregnancy in a rudimentary uterine horn continues to be a challenge to this day. Maintaining a higher degree of alertness, especially in high risk groups by emergency staff is required to prevent the morbidity, as they may present with acute uterine rupture in pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Heinonen PK, Saarikoski S, Pystynen P (1982) Reproductive performance of women with uterine anomalies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 61:157–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Green LK, Harris RE (1976) Uterine anomalies of female genital tract. Obstet Gynecol 47:427–429

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Golan A, Langer R, Bukovsky I, Caspi E (1989) Congenital anomalies of the Mullerian system. Fertil Steril 51:747–755

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raga F, Bauset C, Remohi J, Bonilla-Musoles F, Simon C, Pellicer A (1997) Reproductive impact of congenital Mullerian anomalies. Hum Reprod 12:2277–2281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Johansen K (1983) Pregnancy in a rudimentary horn. Obstet Gynecol 61:565–567

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nahum G (2002) Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: the 20th century worldwide experience of 588 cases. J Reprod Med 47:151–163

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rolen AC, Choquette AJ, Semmens JP (1966) Rudimentary uterine horn: obstetric and gynecologic complications. Obstet Gynecol 27:806–809

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heinonen P (1997) Unicornuate uterus and rudimentary horn. Fertil Steril 68:224–230

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Soundararajan V, Rai J (2000) Laparoscopic removal of a rudimentary uterine horn during pregnancy. J Reprod Med 45:599–602

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suri V, Dhaliwal L, Prasad G, Pathak N, Gupta I (2002) Pregnancy in a noncommunicating horn of a unicornuate uterus with fetal salvage. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 81:473–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghosh N (1966) Pregnancy in the rudimentary horn of a bicornuate uterus. Int Surg 46:567–572

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ural S, Artal R (1998) Third trimester rudimentary horn pregnancy. J Reprod Med 43:919–921

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nahum G (1997) Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy: case report on surviving twins delivered 8 days apart. J Reprod Med 42:525–532

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. DeNicola R, Peterson M (1947) Pregnancy in rudimentary horn of uterus. Am J Surg 73:381–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jayasinghe Y, Rane A, Stalewski H, Grover S (2005) The presentation and early diagnosis of the rudimentary uterine horn. Obstet Gynecol 105(6):1456–1467

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Chang JC, Lin YC (1992) Rupture of rudimentary horn pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 71:235–238

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Daskalakis G, Pilalis A, Lykeridou K et al (2002) Rupture of noncommunicating rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 100:1108–1110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kriplani A, Relan S, Mittai S, Buckshee K (1995) Pre-rupture diagnosis and management of rudimentary horn in the first trimester. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 58:203–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wahlen T (1972) Pregnancy in non-communicating rudimentary uterine horn. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 51:155–160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nahum G (1999) Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. J Reprod Med 44:314–315

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seema Chopra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chopra, S., Keepanasseril, A., Rohilla, M. et al. Obstetric morbidity and the diagnostic dilemma in pregnancy in rudimentary horn: retrospective analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 280, 907–910 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1013-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-009-1013-4

Keywords

Navigation