Skip to main content
Log in

The prognostic impact of successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with organic heart disease

  • ORIGINAL PAPER
  • Published:
Clinical Research in Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of successful cardioversion (CV) compared to failed CV in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and organic heart disease. A total of 471 consecutive patients with organic heart disease from the prospective single center anticoagulation registry ANTIK who underwent CV of AF or atrial flutter were analyzed. 417 patients (89%) could be successfully cardioverted. In 54 patients (11%) CV failed, these patients remained in AF. After 5 years there were 92 (24%) deaths among patients with restored sinus rhythm at index admission and 20 (38%) deaths among those who remained in AF after CV (unadjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1–3.6). After adjustment for age, gender and ejection fraction, successful CV was not associated with a beneficial effect on mortality (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.43–1.21). Thus, successful CV is not an independent predictor of mortality on multivariate analysis. However, it remains a marker for a better prognosis in patients with organic heart disease as these patients have a lower unadjusted longterm mortality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Benjamin EJ, Wolf PA, D‘Agostino RB et al (1998) Impact of atrial fibrillation on the risk of death: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 98:946–952

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bernhardt P, Schmidt H, Sommer T, Lüderitz B, Omran H (2006) Atrial fibrillation: patients at high risk for cerebral embolism. Clin Res Cardiol 95(3):148–153

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackshear JL, Safford RE (2003) AFFIRM and RACE trials: implications for the management of atrial fibrillation. Card Electrophysiol Rev 7(4):366–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boldt A, Scholl A, Garbade M et al (2006) ACE-inhibitor treatment attenuates atrial structural remodeling in patients with lone atrial fibrillation. Basic Res Cardiol 101(3):261– 267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Carson PE, Johnson GR, Dunkman WB et al (1993) The influence of atrial fibrillation on prognosis in mild to moderate heart failure: the VHeFT Studies. Circulation 87:VI-102–VI-110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Corley SD, Epstein AE, DiMarco JP et al (2004) Relationships between sinus rhythm, treatment, and survival in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-Up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) Study. Circulation 109(12):1509–1513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Daoud EG, Weiss R, Bahu M et al (1996) Effect of an irregular ventricular rhythm on cardiac output. Am J Cardiol 78:1433–1436

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dries DL, Exner DV, Gersh BJ et al (1998) Atrial fibrillation is associated with an increased risk for mortality and heart failure progression in patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a retrospective analysis of the SOLVD trials: Studies of Left Ventricular Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:695–703

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gage BF, Van Walraven C, Pearce L et al (2004) Selecting patients with atrial fibrillation for anticoagulation. Circulation 110:2287–2292

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Gowda RM, Khan IA, Punukollu G et al (2004) Female preponderance in ibutilide-induced torsade de pointes. Int J Cardiol 95(2–3):219–222

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaufman ES, Zimmermann PA, Wang T et al (2004) Risk of proarrhythmic events in the trial Fibrillation Followup Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study: a multivariate analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 44(6):1276–1282

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Krahn AD, Manfreda J, Tate RB et al (1995) The natural history of atrial fibrillation: incidence, risk factors, and prognosis in the Manitoba Follow-Up study. Am J Med 98:476–484

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Li D, Shinagawa K, Pang L et al (2001) Effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition on the development of the atrial fibrillation substrate in dogs with ventricular tachypacing- induced congestive heart failure. Circulation 104:2608–2614

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Obergassel L, Lawrenz T, Gietzen FH et al (2006) Effect of transcoronary ablation of septal hypertrophy on clinical outcome in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy associated with atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol 95(5):254–260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olsson LG, Swedberg K, Ducharme A et al (2006) Atrial fibrillation and risk of clinical events in chronic heart failure with and without left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol 47:1997–2004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Reiffel JA (1998) Impact of structural heart disease on the selection of class III antiarrhythmics for the prevention of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Am Heart J 135:551–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ricci RP, Russo M, Santini M (2006) Management of atrial fibrillation: what are the possibilities of early detection with Home Monitoring? Clin Res Cardiol 95(Suppl 3):iii10–iii16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Sanders P, Morton JB, Davidson NC et al (2003) Electrical remodeling of the atria in congestive heart failure: electrophysiological and electroanatomic mapping in humans. Circulation 108:1461–1468

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sparks PB, Mond HG, Vohra JK et al (1999) Electrical remodeling of the atria following loss of atrioventricular synchrony: a long-term study in humans. Circulation 100:1894–1900

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Steinberg JS, Sadaniantz A, Kron J et al (2004) Analysis of cause-specific mortality in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. Circulation 109(16):1973–1980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. The AFFIRM Investigators (2002) Survival of patients presenting with atrial fibrillation in the Atrial Fibrillation Follow-up Investigation of Rhythm Management (AFFIRM) study. N Engl J Med 347:1825–1833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. The AFFIRM investigators (2002) Baseline characteristics of patients with atrial fibrillation: the AFFIRM Study. Am Heart J 143:991–1001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Van Gelder IC, Hagens VE, Bosker HA et al (2002) A comparison of rate control and rhythm control in patients with recurrent persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 347:1834–1840

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wolbrette D (2002) Gender differences in the proarrhythmic potential of QT-prolonging drugs. Curr Womens Health Rep 2(2):105–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wolf PA, Abbott R, Kannel WB (1991) Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham study. Stroke 22:983–988

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Kleemann MD.

Additional information

The authors have no financial interest or other relationship to disclose.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kleemann, T., Becker, T., Dönges, K. et al. The prognostic impact of successful cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with organic heart disease. Clin Res Cardiol 96, 103–108 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0466-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-006-0466-8

Key words

Navigation