Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of a tool to screen at preschool age for minor cognitive disorders liable to affect schooling among children born premature

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Child's Nervous System Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate a detection tool designed to help paediatricians identify, at preschool age, minor neurocognitive disorders that interfere with normal schooling.

Methods

One hundred-and-fourteen preterm singletons born between 1997 and 2001 at less than 32 weeks of amenorrhoea, in a tertiary perinatal care center, were invited to visit us for a medical examination and a rapid neurocognitive assessment (BREV) when they were aged between 4 and 8 years and were re-contacted at 6–10 years of age to evaluate their current schooling situation. Results of BREV and schooling parameters were compared.

Results

Mean gestational age was 29 weeks and mean birth weight was 1,164 g. Fifteen children (13.2%) showed abnormal results on BREV testing and had unusual schooling histories. Among the 68 children with normal BREV, 65 (95.6%) had achieved normal schooling. The sensitivity of the BREV test in this population for detection of minor disorders interfering with schooling was thus 83.3% (95% CI = 57.7–95.6) and the predictive value of a negative test was 95.6% (95% CI = 86.8–98.9). For the 57 children (50%) assessed before the age of 5 years, the sensitivity and the predictive value of a negative test were both 100%.

Conclusion

Our survey shows that the BREV test can, in a population of preschool children who were born premature, screen for minor neurocognitive disorders that impact schooling parameters. BREV assessment, used in the setting of follow-up of premature infants, would identify children in need of early remedial education before schooling under-attainment or failure developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adams-Chapman I, Stoll BJ (2006) Neonatal infection and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome in the preterm infant. Curr Opin Infect Dis 19:290–297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Evaluation de la Santé (ANAES) (2000) Les indications de l’orthophonie dans les troubles spécifiques du langage chez l’enfant. Paris

  3. Agence Nationale d’Accréditation et d’Evaluation de la Santé (ANAES) (2004) Comment évaluer a priori un test de dépistage? Paris

  4. Amiel-Tison C (1999) Maturation du système nerveux central à la période fœtale et postnatale. Neurologie périnatale. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ancel PY, Livinec F, Larroque B, Marret S, Arnaud C, Pierrat V, Dehan M, N'Guyen S, Escande B, Burguet A, Thiriez G, Picaud JC, André M, Bréart G, Kaminski M (2006) Cerebral palsy among very preterm children in relation to gestational age and neonatal ultrasound abnormalities: the EPIPAGE cohort study. Pediatrics 117:828–835

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH, Cradock MM, Anand KJS (2002) Cognitive and behavorial outcomes of school-aged children who are born preterm: a meta-analysis. JAMA 288:728–737

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Billard C, Livet MO, Motte J, Vallée L, Gillet P, Galloux A, Piller AG, Vol S (2001) La BREV : une batterie clinique d'évaluation des fonctions cognitives chez les enfants d'âge scolaire et préscolaire. Arch Pediatr 8:545–552

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Billard C, Livet MO, Motte J, Vallée L, Gillet P (2002) The BREV neuropsychological test: Part I. Results from 500 normally developing children. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:391–397

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Billard C, Motte J, Farmer M, Livet MO, Vallée L, Gillet P, Vol S (2002) Neuropsychological test: Part II. Results of validation in children with epilepsy. Dev Med Child Neurol 44:398–404

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Billard C, Ducot B, Pinton F, Coste-Zeitoun D, Picard S, Warszawski J (2006) Validation of BREV: comparison with reference battery in 173 children with learning disorders. Arch Pediatr 13:23–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caravale B, Tozzi C, Albino G, Vicari S (2005) Cognitive development in low risk preterm infants at 3–4 years of life. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal 90:474–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Colvin M, McGuire W, Fowlie PW (2004) Neurodevelopmental outcomes after preterm birth. BMJ 329:1390–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooke RWI (2005) Perinatal and postnatal factor in very preterm infants and subsequent cognitive and motor abilities. Arch Child Dis Neonatal Ed 90:60–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delobel-Ayoub M, Kaminski M, Marret BA, Marchand L, N'Guyen S, Matis J, Thiriez G, Fresson J, Arnaud C, Poher M, Larroque B (2006) Behavioral outcome at 3 years of age in very preterm infants: the EPIPAGE study. Pediatrics 117:1996–2005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Einaudi MA, Busuttil M, Monnier AS, Chanus I, Palix C, Gire C (2008) Neuropsychological screening of a group of preterm twins: comparison with singletons. Child Nerv Syst 24:225–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hack M, Fanaroff AA (1999) Outcome of children of extremely low birth weight and gestational age in the 1990’s. Early Hum Dev 53:193–218

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoekstra RE, Ferrara B, Couser RJ, Payne NR, Connett JE (2004) Survival and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely premature infants born at 23–26 weeks gestational age at a tertiary center. Pediatrics 113:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson S, Marlow N (2006) Developmental screen or developmental testing? Early Hum Dev 82:173–183

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Larroque B, Bréart G, Kaminski M, Dehan M, André M, Burguet A, Grandjean H, Ledésert B, Lévêque C, Maillard F, Matis J, Rozé JC, Truffert P (2004) Survival of very preterm infants: Epipage, a population based cohort study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 89:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Marlow N, Wolke D, Bracewell MA, Samara M (2005) Neurologic and developmental disability at six years of age after extremely preterm birth. N Engl J Med 352:9–19

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O’Shea TM (2002) Cerebral palsy in very preterm infants: new epidemiological insights. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 8:135–145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O'Shea TM, Counsell SJ, Bartels DB, Dammann O (2005) Magnetic resonance and ultrasound brain imaging in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev 81:263–271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Palisano RJ, Cameron D, Rosenbaum PL, Walter SD, Russell D (2006) Stability of the gross motor function classification system. Dev Med Child Neurol 48:424–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Paneth N (1999) Classifying brain damage in preterm infants. J Pediatr 134:207–219

    Google Scholar 

  25. Papile LA, Burstein J, Burstein R, Koffler H (1978) Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weight less than 1500 g. J Pediatr 74:358–363

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pull CB (1995) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th edition. Encephale 21:15–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Saigal S, Den Ouden L, Wolke D, Hoult L, Paneth N, Streiner DL, Whitaker A, Pinto-Martin J (2003) School-age outcomes in children who were extremely low birth weight from international population-based cohorts. Pediatrics 112:943–950

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Selton D, André M, Hascoët JM (2000) Normal EEG in very premature infants: reference criteria. Clin Neurophysiol 111:2116–2124

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Simeoni U (1999) Quoi de neuf en néonatologie ? Arch Pediatr 6:447–456

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Snijders RJ, Nicolaides KH (1994) Fetal biometry at 14–40 weeks’ gestation. Ultrasound Obst Gynecol 4:34–48

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Stark AR, Tyson JE, Oh W, Bauer CR, Korones SB, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Poole WK (2002) Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med 347:240–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Carlo WA, Ehrenkranz RA, Lemons JA, Donovan EF, Stark AR, Tyson JE, Oh W, Bauer CR, Korones SB, Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Stevenson DK, Papile LA, Poole WK (2002) Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD neonatal research network. Pediatrics 110:285–291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, Fanaroff AA, Hintz SR, Vohr B, Higgins RD (2004) Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA 292:2357–2365

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Tresmontant R, Papiernik E (1983) Economic-analysis of the prevention of preterm births in twin pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gyn Reprod Biol 15:277–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Urrea M, Iriondo M, Thio M, Krauel X, Serra M, LaTorre C, Jiménez R (2003) A prospective incidence study of nosocomial infections in a neonatal care unit. Am J Infect Control 31:505–507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Usher R, Mc Lean F (1969) Intrauterine growth of live-born Caucasian infants at sea level: standards obtained from measurements in 7 dimensions of infants born between 25 and 44 weeks of gestation. J Pediatr 74:901–910

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Walsh MC, Kliegman RM (1986) Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria. Pediatr Clin North Am 33:179–201

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Wheater M, Rennie JM (2000) Perinatal infections is an important risk factor for cerebral palsy in very-low-birthweight infants. Dev Med Child Neurol 42:364–367

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. World Health Organization (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  40. World Health Organization (2005) ICD-10: international statistical classification of diseases and related health problems: tenth revision. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Véronique Brévaut-Malaty.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brévaut-Malaty, V., Busuttil, M., Einaudi, MA. et al. Evaluation of a tool to screen at preschool age for minor cognitive disorders liable to affect schooling among children born premature. Childs Nerv Syst 25, 1437–1445 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0922-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-009-0922-7

Keywords

Navigation