Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of electrical discharge machining parameters on hardened die steel using Firefly Algorithm

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Electric discharge machining (EDM) is one of the most widely used die-making processes especially in aerospace, automobile and electronics industries. The profile manufactured by EDM process should be dimensionally and geometrically accurate apart from good finish. This expectation is very much important as the die manufactured from EDM process is subjected to subsequent mass production. The material normally selected for die making will be superior in quality and hence time and cost of production will also be high. Selection of optimum EDM parameters may reduce the machining time along with maintaining required surface finish and dimensional accuracy. So there is a need to develop a technique for selecting the optimal EDM parameters to achieve the desired performance measures. In the present work, a recently developed Firefly Algorithm (FA) was implemented in the developed mathematical model based on the experiments conducted on an EDM. Investigations are also carried out to study the effect of EDM parameters such as current and pulse-on time on the surface roughness and machining time. The optimized machining parameters and the developed empirical relations are validated by confirmatory experiments. Machining parameters limits and desired surface finish are considered as practical constraints for both experimental and theoretical approaches. The predicted and actual machining time and surface roughness values reveals that FA is very much suitable for solving machining parameters optimization problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

I :

Current (A)

T :

Pulse-on time (μs)

r :

Distance between any two fireflies

α :

Randomization parameter

β :

Attractiveness

β o :

Initial attractiveness at r = 0

γ :

Light absorption coefficient

np:

New position

cp:

Current position

SR:

Surface roughness (μm)

MT:

Machining time (min)

References

  1. Aphirak Khadwilard, Sirikarn Chansombat, Thatchai Thepphakorn, Peeraya Thapatsuwan, Warattapop Chainate and Pupong Pongcharoen (2012) Application of Firefly Algorithm and its parameter setting for job shop scheduling. J Ind Technol 8(1)

  2. Aungkulanon P, Chai-ead N, Luangpaiboon P (2011) Simulated manufacturing process improvement via particle swarm optimization and Firefly algorithm. In: Proceedings of the International multi-conference of engineers and computer scientists. Vol.II

  3. Azlan Mohd Zain, Habibollah Haron, Safian Sharif (2011) Genetic algorithm and simulated annealing to estimate optimal process parameters of the abrasive water jet machining. Eng Comput 27:251–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bharathi Raja S, Baskar N (2012) Application of particle swarm optimization technique for achieving desired milled surface roughness in minimum machining time. Expert Syst Appl 39:5982–5989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bharathi Raja S, Sathiya Narayanan N, Srinivas Pramod CV, Raghunathan Arvind, Vinesh Somala Raju, Vamshee Krishna K (2012) Optimization of constrained machining parameters in turning operation using Firefly algorithm. J Appl Sci 12(10):1038–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chai-Ead N, Aungkulanon P, Luangpaiboon P (2011) Bees and Firefly algorithms for noisy non-linear optimization problems. In: Proceedings of the International multi-conference of engineers and computer scientists. Vol.II

  7. Debabrata Mandal, Pal Surya K, Partha Saha (2007) Modeling of electrical discharge machining process using back propagation neural network and multi-objective optimization using non-dominating sorting genetic algorithm-II. J Mater Process Technol 186:154–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fenggou Cao, Dayong Yang (2004) The study of high efficiency and intelligent optimization system in EDM sinking process. J Mater Process Technol 149:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Horng Ming-Huwi, Liou Ren-Jean (2011) Multilevel minimum entropy threshold selection based on the firefly algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 38:14805–14811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Joshi SN, Pandeb SS (2011) Intelligent process modeling and optimization of die-sinking electric discharge machining. Appl Soft Comput 11:2743–2755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kansal HK, Singh Sehijpal, Kumar P (2005) Parametric optimization of powder mixed electrical discharge machining by response surface methodology. J Mater Process Technol 169:427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Krishna Mohana Rao G, Ramgajanardhaa G, Hanumantha Rao D, Sreenivasa Rao M (2009) Development of hybrid model and optimization of surface roughness in electric discharge machining using artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm. J Mater Process Technol 209:1512–1520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumagi Seiji, Sato Naoki, Takeda Koichi (2007) Operation parameter optimization for fabrication of a narrow, deep hole in metal by electrical discharge machining using a dielectric-encased wire electrode. J Mater Process Technol 189:310–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin JL, Lin CL (2002) The use of the orthogonal array with grey relational analysis to optimize the electrical discharge machining process with multiple performance characteristics. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42:237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matoorian P, Sulaiman S, Ahmad MMHM (2008) An experimental study for optimization of electrical discharge turning (EDT) process. J Mater Process Technol 204:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Narender Singh P, Raghukandan K, Pai BC (2004) Optimization by grey relational analysis of EDM parameters on machining Al-10% SiCp composites. J Mater Process Technol 155:1658–1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Puertas I, Luis CJ (2003) A study on the machining parameters optimization of electrical discharge machining. J Mater Process Technol 143–144:521–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Theofanis Apostolopoulos and Aristidis Vlachos (2011) Application of the Firefly algorithm for solving the economic emissions load dispatch problem. Int J Combinatorics. doi:10.1155/2011/523806

  19. Tzeng Yih-fong, Chen Fu-chen (2007) Multi-objective optimization of high speed electrical discharge machining process using a Teguchi fuzzy-based approach. Mater Des 28:1159–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Xin-She Yang (2012) ‘Multiobjective firefly algorithm for continuous optimization’. Eng Comput. doi: 10.1007/s00366-012-0254-1

  21. Yang Xin-She, Hosseni Seyyaed Soheil Sadat, Gandomic Amir Hossein (2012) Firefly algorithm for solving non-convex economic dispatch problems with valve loading effect. Appl Soft Comput 12:1180–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yang Xin She (2009) Firefly Algorithms for multimodal optimization. Lect Notes Comput Sci 5792:169–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Bharathi Raja.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bharathi Raja, S., Srinivas Pramod, C.V., Vamshee Krishna, K. et al. Optimization of electrical discharge machining parameters on hardened die steel using Firefly Algorithm. Engineering with Computers 31, 1–9 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-013-0320-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-013-0320-3

Keywords

Navigation