Abstract
Objectives
This review describes the morbidity of inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) performed as part of the management of penile cancer as well as recent modifications that may reduce the incidence of complications.
Methods
A review of the literature was conducted using Pubmed© for studies reporting complication outcomes of ILND for penile cancer. Furthermore, our contemporary results and patient related morbidity associated with ILND performed for penile cancer are reported and compared with prior series.
Results
A review of the literature over the past 25 years identified 27 manuscripts discussing complications of ILND in the context of penile cancer. ILND has traditionally been associated with an 80–100% risk of surgical morbidity, with skin necrosis, wound dehiscence, infection, and lymphedema the predominant findings. Recent technical modifications and management strategies have reduced the associated risks of this surgical procedure. Most recently, we report a 19 and 27% rate of minor and major complications, respectively, for a diagnostic ILND (i.e., superficial ILND alone in the absence of nodal metastasis) and a 29 and 24% rate of minor and major complications, respectively, for a therapeutic ILND (superficial/deep ILND and pelvic lymph node dissection in the presence of nodal metastasis). In contrast, among clinically node negative patients undergoing dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy as a staging procedure, the reported complication rate was 7%.
Conclusions
The incorporation of novel management strategies and surgical modifications have resulted in decreasing peri-operative morbidity associated with inguinal staging and therapy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Taussky D, Crook J, Al Ghamdi A, Fleshner N, Jewett MA (2006) Treatment of the inguinal regions in penile cancer: a review of the literature and treatment proposal. Can J Urol 13:2978–2983
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, Tanis PJ, Gallee MP, Nieweg OE (2005) Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 173:816–819
Ravi R (1993) Morbidity following groin dissection for penile carcinoma. Br J Urol 72:941–945
Ornellas AA, Seixas AL, de Moraes JR (1991) Analysis of 200 lymphadenectomies in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol 146:330–332
Johnson DE, Lo RK (1984) Complications of groin dissection in penile cancer. Experience with 101 lymphadenectomies. Urology 24:312–314
Coblentz TR, Theodorescu D (2002) Morbidity of modified prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. J Urol 168:1386–1389
Milathianakis C, Bogdanos J, Karamanolakis D (2005) Morbidity of prophylactic inguinal lymphadenectomy with saphenous vein preservation for squamous cell penile carcinoma. Int J Urol 12:776–778
Slaton JW, Morgenstern N, Levy DA, Santos MW Jr, Tamboli P, Ro JY, Ayala AG, Pettaway CA (2001) Tumor stage, vascular invasion, and the percentage of poorly differentiated cancer: independent prognosticators for inguinal lymph node metastasis in penile squamous cancer. J Urol 165:1138–1142
Wein A, Kavoussi L, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CG (2007) Tumors of he penis (chapter 31). Campbell-Walsh Urology, 9th edn. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 959–992
Solsona E, Algaba F, Horenblas S, Pizzocaro G, Windahl T (2004) EAU guidelines on penile cancer. Eur Urol 46:1–8
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Meinhardt W, van der Poel HG, Bex A, van Tinteren H, Valdes Olmos RA, Nieweg OE (2005) Dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma: evaluation of 10 years experience. Eur Urol 47:601–606
Kroon BK, Valdes-Olmos RA, van Tinteren H, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S (2005) Reproducibility of lymphoscintigraphy for lymphatic mapping in patients with penile carcinoma. J Urol 174:2214–2217
Spiess PE, Izawa JI, Bassett R, Kedar D, Busby JE, Wong F, Eddings T, Tamboli P, Pettaway CA (2007) Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and dynamic sentinel node biopsy for staging penile cancer: Results with pathological correlation. J Urol 177:2157–2161
Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Estourgie SH, Lont AP, Valdes Olmos RA, Nieweg OE (2004) How to avoid false-negative dynamic sentinel node procedures in penile carcinoma. J Urol 171:2191–2194
Lont AP, Kroon BK, Gallee MP, van Tinteren H, Moonen LM, Horenblas S (2007) Pelvic lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma: extent of inguinal lymph node involvement as an indicator for pelvic lymph node involvement and survival. J Urol 177:947–952
Bermejo C, Busby JE, Spiess PE, Heller L, Pagliaro LC, Pettaway CA (2007) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by aggressive surgical consolidation for metastatic penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol 177:1335–1338
Sobin LH, Wittekind C (1997) UICC International Union Against Cancer: Urological tumours. Wiley-Liss, New York, pp 187–201
Bevan-Thomas R, Slaton JW, Pettaway CA (2002) Contemporary morbidity from lymphadenectomy for penile squamous cell carcinoma: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center Experience. J Urol 167:1638–1642
Kamat MR, Kulkarni JN, Tongaonkar HB (1993) Carcinoma of the penis: the Indian experience. J Surg Oncol 52:50–55
Josephs LG, Cordts PR, DiEdwardo CL, LaMorte WW, Menzoian JP (1993) Do infected inguinal lymph nodes increase the incidence of postoperative groin wound infection. J Vasc Surg 17:1077–1080
Tonouchi H, Ohmori Y, Kobayashi M, Konishi N, Tanaka K, Mohri Y, Mizutani H, Kusunoki M (2004) Operative morbidity associated with groin dissections. Surg Today 34:413–418
Qi F, Gu J, Shi Y (2008) Difficult groin reconstruction using contralateral rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:147e–148e
Evriviades D, Raurell A, Perks AG (2007) Pedicled anterolateral thigh flap for reconstruction after radical groin dissection. Urology 70:996–999
Rayment R, Evans DM (1987) Use of an abdominal rotation flap for inguinal lymph node dissection. Br J Plast Surg 40:485–487
Abraham V, Ravi R, Shrivastava BR (1992) Primary reconstruction to avoid wound breakdown following groin block dissection. Br J Plast Surg 45:211–213
Parkash S (1982) Use of myocutaneous flaps in block dissections of the groin in cases with gross skin involvement. Br J Plast Surg 35:413–419
Bouchot O, Rigaud J, Maillet F, Hetet JF, Karam G (2004) Morbidity of inguinal lymphadenectomy for invasive penile carcinoma. Eur Urol 45:761–765
Nelson BA, Cookson MS, Smith JA Jr, Chang SS (2004) Complications of inguinal and pelvic lymphadenectomy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a contemporary series. J Urol 172:494–497
Catalona WJ (1988) Modified inguinal lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the penis with preservation of saphenous veins: technique and preliminary results. J Urol 140:306–310
Zhang X, Sheng X, Niu J, Li H, Li D, Tang L, Li Q, Li Q (2007) Sparing of Saphenous vein during inguinal Lymphadenectomy for vulvar malignancies. Gynecol Oncol 105:722–726
Magri K, Bertrand V, Sautiere JL, Pivot X, Riethmuller D, Maillet R, Marinkovic Z (2006) Cost effectiveness of Ligasure Precise versus surgical clips during axillary nodal dissection for breast cancer. J Gynecol Obstet Reprod (Paris) 35:341–347
Adwani A, Ebbs SR (2006) Ultracision reduces acute blood loss but not seroma formation after mastectomy and axillary dissection: a pilot study. Int J Clin Pract 60:562–564
Garfein ES, Borud LJ, Warren AG, Slavin SA (2008) Learning from a lymphedema clinic: an algorithm for the management of localized swelling. Plast Reconstr Surg 121:521–528
Warren AG, Brorson H, Borud LJ, Slavin SA (2007) Lymphedema: a comprehensive review. Ann Plast Surg 59:464–472
Malone PC, Agutter PS (2006) The aetiology of deep venous thrombosis. QJM 99:581–593
Ettema HB, Kollen BJ, Verheyen CC, Buller HR (2008) Prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with immobilization of the lower extremity: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Thromb Haemost 6(7):1093–1098
Sawchuk IS, Williams D, Chang DT (2002) Low molecular weight heparin for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in urologic oncologic surgery. Cancer Invest 20:889–892
Kroon BK, Lont AP, Valdes Olmos RA, Nieweg OE, Horenblas S (2005) Morbidity of dynamic sentinel node biopsy in penile carcinoma. J Urol 173:813–815
Tobias-Machado M, Tavares A, Ornellas AA, Molina WR Jr, Juliano RV, Wroclawski ER (2007) Video endoscopic inguinal lymphadenectomy: a new minimally invasive procedure for radical management of inguinal nodes in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma. J Urol 177:953–957
Sotelo R, Sanchez-Salas R, Carmano O, Garcia A, Mariano M, Neiva G, Trujillo G, Novoa J, Cornejo F, Finelli A (2007) Endoscopic lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma. J Endourol 21:364–367
Lopes A, Hidalgo GS, Kowalski LP, Torlani H, Rossi BM, Fonseca FP (1996) Prognostic factors in carcinoma of the penis: multivariate analysis of 145 patients treated with amputation and lymphadenectomy. J Urol 156:1637–1642
Darai E, Karaitianos I, Durand JC (1988) Treatment of inguinal lymph nodes in cancer of the penis. Apropos of 85 cases treated at the Institute Curie. Ann Chir 42:748–752
Ayyappan K, Ananthakrishnan N, Sankaran V (1994) Can regional lymph node involvement be predicted in patients with carcinoma of the penis? Br J Urol 73:549–553
Conflict of interest statement
There is no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Spiess, P.E., Hernandez, M.S. & Pettaway, C.A. Contemporary inguinal lymph node dissection: minimizing complications. World J Urol 27, 205–212 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0324-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-008-0324-6