Skip to main content
Log in

Early response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during anti-angiogenic therapy using arterial spin labelling: first clinical results

  • Oncology
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To determine if arterial-spin-labelling (ASL) MRI can reliably detect early response to anti-angiogenic therapy in patients with multiple myeloma by comparison with clinical/haematological response.

Methods

Nineteen consecutive patients (10 men; mean age 63.5 ± 9.1 years) were included in the present study. Inclusion criteria were diagnosis of stage III multiple myeloma and clinical indication for therapeutical administration of bortezomib or lenalidomide. We performed MRI on 3.0T MR in the baseline setting, 3 weeks after onset of therapy and after 8 weeks. Clinical responses were determined on the basis of international uniform response criteria in correlation with haematological parameters and medium-term patient outcome. MRI studies were performed after approval by the local institutional review board.

Results

Fifteen patients responded to anti-myeloma therapy; 4/19 patients were non-responders to therapy. Mean tumour perfusion assessed by ASL-MRI in a reference lesion was 220.7 ± 132.5 ml min−1 100 g−1 at baseline, and decreased to 125.7 ± 86.3 (134.5 ± 150.9) ml min−1 100 g−1 3 (8) weeks after onset of therapy (P < 0.02). The mean decrease in paraproteinaemia at week 3 (8) was 52.3 ± 47.7% (58.2 ± 58.7%), whereas β2-microglobulinaemia decreased by 20.3 ± 53.1% (23.3 ± 57.0%). Correlation of ASL perfusion with outcome was significant (P = 0.0037).

Conclusion

ASL tumour perfusion measurements are a valuable surrogate parameter for early assessment of response to novel anti-angiogenic therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1a–d
Fig. 2a–d
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar S, Fonseca R, Dispenzieri A et al (2002) Bone marrow angiogenesis in multiple myeloma: effect of therapy. Br J Haematol 119:665–671

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pruneri G, Ponzoni M, Ferreri AJ et al (2002) Microvessel density, a surrogate marker of angiogenesis, is significantly related to survival in multiple myeloma patients. Br J Haematol 118:817–820

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lin C, Luciani A, Belhadj K et al (2009) Patients with plasma cell disorders examined at whole-body dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging: initial experience. Radiology 250:905–915

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Pollock JM, Tan H, Kraft RA et al (2009) Arterial spin-labeled MR perfusion imaging: clinical applications. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 17:315–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Blade J, Samson D, Reece D et al (1998) Criteria for evaluating disease response and progression in patients with multiple myeloma treated by high-dose therapy and haemopoietic stem cell transplantation. Myeloma Subcommittee of the EBMT. European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplant. Br J Haematol 102:1115–1123

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Montazel J, Divine M, Lepage E et al (2003) Normal spinal bone marrow in adults: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229:703–709

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K Nishitani H (2009) Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of endometrial cancer: differentiation from benign endometrial lesions and preoperative assessment of myometrial invasion. Acta Radiol 1:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kyle RA, Rajkumar SV (2004) Multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 28(351):1860–1873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Anderson KC (2003) Multiple myeloma: how far have we come? Mayo Clin Proc 78:15–17

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Attal M, Harousseau JL, Facon T et al (2003) Single versus double autologous stem-cell transplantation for multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 349:2495–2502

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hideshima T, Anderson KC (2002) Molecular mechanisms of novel therapeutic approaches for multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Cancer 2:927–937

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Richardson PG, Sonneveld P, Schuster MW et al (2005) Bortezomib or high-dose dexamethasone for relapsed multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 352:2487–2498

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Richardson PG, Barlogie B, Berenson J et al (2003) A phase 2 study of bortezomib in relapsed, refractory myeloma. N Engl J Med 348:2609–2617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Richardson PG, Schlossman RL, Weller E et al (2002) Immunomodulatory drug CC-5013 overcomes drug resistance and is well tolerated in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma. Blood 100:3063–3067

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies FE, Raje N, Hideshima T et al (2001) Thalidomide and immunomodulatory derivatives augment natural killer cell cytotoxicity in multiple myeloma. Blood 98:210–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hideshima T, Chauhan D, Shima Y et al (2000) Thalidomide and its analogs overcome drug resistance of human multiple myeloma cells to conventional therapy. Blood 96:2943–2950

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Horger M, Pereira P, Claussen CD et al (2008) Hyperattenuating bone marrow abnormalities in myeloma patients using whole-body non-enhanced low-dose MDCT: correlation with haematological parameters. Br J Radiol 81:386–396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Walker R, Barlogie B, Haessler J et al (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in multiple myeloma: diagnostic and clinical implications. J Clin Oncol 25:1121–1128

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Angtuaco EJ, Fassas AB, Walker R et al (2004) Multiple myeloma: clinical review and diagnostic imaging. Radiology 231:11–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Warmuth C, Gunther M, Zimmer C (2003) Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228:523–532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Schor-Bardach R, Alsop DC, Pedrosa I et al (2009) Does arterial spin-labeling MR imaging–measured tumor perfusion correlate with renal cell cancer response to antiangiogenic therapy in a mouse model? Radiology 251:731–742

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Rahmouni A, Montazel JL, Divine M et al (2003) Bone marrow with diffuse tumor infiltration in patients with lymphoproliferative diseases: dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 229:710–717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Fenchel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fenchel, M., Konaktchieva, M., Weisel, K. et al. Early response assessment in patients with multiple myeloma during anti-angiogenic therapy using arterial spin labelling: first clinical results. Eur Radiol 20, 2899–2906 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1870-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-010-1870-z

Keywords

Navigation