Abstract
The aim of this study was to (1) generate quantitative CT (QCT) densitometric data based on routine abdominal multi-detector (MDCT) examinations and (2) investigate whether these data can be used to differentiate osteoporotic from healthy females. Twenty-five female patients (group A) with a history of radiotherapy were examined both with routine abdominal MDCT and standard QCT to generate a MDCT-to-QCT conversion equation. Twenty-one osteoporotic (group B) and 23 healthy female patients (group C) were also recruited in the study. Patients of groups B and C underwent routine abdominal MDCT examination for various clinical indications. Mean bone mineral density (BMD) in patients of group A was 103.4 mg/ml ± 32.8 with routine abdominal MDCT and 91.0 mg/ml ± 28.5 with QCT. Quantitative CT BMDQCT values for patients in groups B and C were calculated utilizing the BMDMDCT values derived from routine abdominal MDCT data sets and the MDCT to QCT conversion equation: \({\text{BMD}}_{{\text{QCT}}} = 0.78 \cdot {\text{BMD}}_{{\text{MDCT}}} + 10.13\). The calculated QCT densitometric data adequately differentiated osteoporotic from healthy females (area under ROC curve 0.828, p = 0.05). In conclusion, this study showed that in a group of female patients, QCT data derived from routine abdominal MDCT examinations discriminated osteoporotic from healthy subjects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lau EMO (2001) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 15:335–344
Guglielmi G, Lang TF (2002) Quantitative computed tomography. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:219–227
Karantanas AH, Kalef-Ezra JA, Glaros DC (1996) Quantitative computed tomography for bone mineral measurement: technical aspects, dosimetry, normal data and clinical applications. Br J Radiol 64:298–304
Link TM, Majumdar S, Grampp S, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Imhof H, Gluer C, Admas JE (1999) Imaging of trabecular bone structure in osteoporosis. Eur Radiol 9:1781–1788
Link TM, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, Adams JE (2005) Radiologic assessment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Eur Radiol 15:1521–1532
Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Gluer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M (1997) Comparisons of non-invasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination and diagnostic classification. J Bone Min Res 12:697–711
Lang TF, Guglielmi G, van Kuijk C, De Serio A, Cammisa M, Genant HK (2002) Measurement of bone mineral density at the spine and proximal femur by volumetric quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in elderly women with and without vertebral fractures. Bone 30:247–250
Link T, Koppers B, Licht T, Bauer J, Lu Y, Rummeny EJ (2004) In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 231:805–811
Hopper KD, Wang MO, Kunselman AR (2000) The use of clinical CT for baseline bone density assessment. J Comput Assist Tomogr 24:896–899
Weishaupt D, Schweitzer A, DiCuccio M, Whitley P (2001) Relationships of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar bone mineral density by quantitative CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr 25:146–150
Kalender W, Suess C (1987) A new calibration phantom for quantitative computed tomography. Med Phys 14:863–866
Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T et al (2004) Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 230:619–628
Brown JP, Josse RG, for the Scientific Advisory Council of the osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(suppl.10):S1–S34
Blake GM, Fogelman I (1998) Applications of bone densitometry for osteoporosis. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am 27:267–288
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Papadakis, A.E., Karantanas, A.H., Papadokostakis, G. et al. Can abdominal multi-detector CT diagnose spinal osteoporosis?. Eur Radiol 19, 172–176 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1099-2
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-008-1099-2