Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Colorectal hepatic metastases: quantitative measurements using single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging

  • Hepatobiliary-Pancreas
  • Published:
European Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to obtain quantitative measurements of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC1), flow insensitive apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC2) and perfusion fraction (F) of colorectal hepatic metastases using DWI and to compare these measurements with those obtained in liver parenchyma. Forty patients with 66 hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma were prospectively evaluated using DWI with three b values. Quantitative maps of the ADC1 (using b=0, 150, 500 s/mm2images), ADC2 (using b=150, 500 s/mm2 images) and fractional variation (F) between ADC1 and ADC2, which reflects perfusion fraction, were calculated. The ADC1, ADC2 and F derived from metastases and liver parenchyma were compared. The mean ADC1 values of liver parenchyma and metastases were significantly higher than the mean ADC2 values (P<0.0001, paired t-test). Colorectal metastases were found to have higher mean ADC1 and ADC2 values compared with liver (P<0.0001, Mann-Whitney test). However, the estimated F was found to be lower in metastases compared to liver (P=0.03, Mann-Whitney test). Colorectal hepatic metastases were characterised by higher ADC1 and ADC2 values, but lower F values compared to liver.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yamashita Y, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1998) Ultrafast MR imaging of the abdomen: echo planar imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:367–374

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ito K, Mitchell DG, Matsunaga N (1999) MR imaging of the liver: techniques and clinical applications. Eur J Radiol 32:2–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Okada Y, Ohtomo K, Kiryu S, Sasaki Y (1998) Breath-hold T2-weighted MRI of hepatic tumors: value of echo planar imaging with diffusion-sensitizing gradient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 22:364–371

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Taouli B, Vilgrain V, Dumont E, Daire JL, Fan B, Menu Y (2003) Evaluation of liver diffusion isotropy and characterization of focal hepatic lesions with two single-shot echo-planar MR imaging sequences: prospective study in 66 patients. Radiology 226:71–78

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nasu K (2003) Evaluation of hepatic metastasis on SENSE-DWI: comparison with SPIO-MRI. Chicago 363

  6. Yamada I, Aung W, Himeno Y, Nakagawa T, Shibuya H (1999) Diffusion coefficients in abdominal organs and hepatic lesions: evaluation with intravoxel incoherent motion echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 210:617–623

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Namimoto T, Yamashita Y, Sumi S, Tang Y, Takahashi M (1997) Focal liver masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 204:739–744

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Delakis I, Moore EM, Leach MO, De Wilde JP (2004) Developing a quality control protocol for diffusion imaging on a clinical MRI system. Phys Med Biol 49:1409–1422

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Le Bihan D, Breton E, Lallemand D, Aubin ML, Vignaud J, Laval-Jeantet M (1988) Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 168:497–505

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim YK, Lee JM, Kim CS, Chung GH, Kim CY, Kim IH (2005) Detection of liver metastases: gadobenate dimeglumine-enhanced three-dimensional dynamic phases and one-hour delayed phase MR imaging versus superparamagnetic iron oxide-enhanced MR imaging. Eur Radiol 15:220–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Roth Y, Tichler T, Kostenich G et al (2004) High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for pretreatment prediction and early monitoring of tumor response to therapy in mice. Radiology 232:685–692

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Chen F et al (2005) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in monitoring the effect of a vascular targeting agent on rhabdomyosarcoma in rats. Radiology 234:756–764

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Vandecaveye V et al (2005) Effect of vascular targeting agent in rat tumor model: dynamic contrast-enhanced versus diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Radiology 237:492–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brauer M (2003) In vivo monitoring of apoptosis. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 27:323–331

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Murtz P, Flacke S, Traber F, van den Brink JS, Gieseke J, Schild HH (2002) Abdomen: diffusion-weighted MR imaging with pulse-triggered single-shot sequences. Radiology 224:258–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ichikawa T, Haradome H, Hachiya J, Nitatori T, Araki T (1998) Diffusion-weighted MR imaging with a single-shot echoplanar sequence: detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:397–402

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Muller MF, Prasad P, Siewert B, Nissenbaum MA, Raptopoulos V, Edelman RR (1994) Abdominal diffusion mapping with use of a whole-body echo-planar system. Radiology 190:475–478

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S, Hori M, Tsuda K, Nakamura H (1999) Diffusion-weighted single-shot echoplanar MR imaging for liver disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 173:393–398

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

This work is supported by Cancer Research UK Grant number C1060/A5117.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. M. Koh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koh, D.M., Scurr, E., Collins, D.J. et al. Colorectal hepatic metastases: quantitative measurements using single-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Eur Radiol 16, 1898–1905 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0201-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-006-0201-x

Keywords

Navigation