Abstract
Introduction
Vinorelbine alone and irinotecan alone have been shown to have efficacy against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); each drug has different mechanisms of action. A phase I study using a combination of vinorelbine and irinotecan as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC was done to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT).
Methods
Previously untreated patients (≤75 years old) with Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC were enrolled. Based on a 4-week cycle, vinorelbine was given on days 1 and 8, and irinotecan was given on days 1, 8, and 15 intravenously. To prevent an injection site reaction to vinorelbine, the site was treated with topical clobetasol ointment, and the patients were given intravenous dexamethasone prior to vinorelbine treatment. DLT was defined as grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥4 days or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 thrombocytopenia, ≥grade 3 non-hematological toxicities, or the need to cancel drug administration on both days 8 and 15.
Results
A total of 23 patients were enrolled. DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients at level 3 (20 mg/m2 vinorelbine, 50 mg/m2 irinotecan), in 2 of 3 at level 4 (25 mg/m2, 50 mg/m2), and in 2 of 5 at modified level 4 (20, 60 mg/m2). Level 4 and modified level 4 were considered to be the MTD; dose level 3 was therefore recommended. DLTs included liver dysfunction, pneumonitis, colitis, and arrhythmia. Injection site reactions were mild. Hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and easily controlled.
Conclusion
Use of 20 mg/m2 vinorelbine on days 1 and 8 followed by 50 mg/m2 irinotecan on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks warrants a phase II study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group (1995) Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using update data on individual patients from 52 randomized clinical trials. Br Med J 311:899–909
Bunn PA Jr, Kelly K (1998) New chemotherapeutic agents prolong survival and improve quality of life in non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the literature and future directions. Clin Cancer Res 4:1087–1100
Hotta K, Matsuo K, Ueoka H, Kiura K, Tabata M, Tanimator M (2004) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3852–3859
Pfister DG, Johnson DH, Azzoli CG, Sause W, Smith TJ, Baker S Jr, Olak J, Stover D, Strawn JR, Turrisi AT, Somerfield MR (2004) American society of clinical oncology treatment of unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer guideline: update 2003. J Clin Oncol 22:330–353
Hayes DM, Cvitkovic E, Golbey RB, Scheiner E, Helson L, Krakoff IH (1977) High dose cis-platinum diamine dichloride: amelioration of renal toxicity by mannitol diuresis. Cancer 39:1372–1381
Hotta K, Matsuo K, Ueoka H, Kiura K, Tabata M, Tanimoto M (2004) Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials comparing cisplatin to carboplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3852–3859
Kunimoto T, Nitta K, Tanaka T, Uehara N, Baba H, Takeuchi M, Yokokura T, Sawada S, Miyasaka T, Mutai M (1987) Antitumor activity of 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino] carbonyloxy-camptothecin, a novel water-soluble derivative of camptothecin, against murine tumors. Cancer Res 47:5944–5947
Kawato Y, Aonuma M, Hirota Y, Kuga H, Sato K (1991) Intracellular roles of SN-38, a metabolite of the camptothecin derivative CPT-11, in the antitumor effect of CPT-11. Cancer Res 51:4187–4191
Fukuoka M, Niitani H, Suzuki A, Motomiya M, Hasegawa K, Nishiwaki Y, Kuriyama T, Ariyoshi Y, Negoro S, Masuda N (1992) A phase II study of CPT-11, a new derivative of camptothecin, for previously untreated non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 10:16–20
Hohneker JA (1994) A summary of vinorelbine (Navelbine) safety data from North American clinical trials. Semin Oncol 21:42–46
Burris HA 3rd, Fields S (1994) Summary of data from in vitro and phase I vinorelbine (Navelbine) studies. Semin Oncol 21:14–19
Coltman CA Jr (1994) Vinorelbine (Navelbine), a new agent for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: a summary. Semin Oncol 21:1–3
Wozniak AJ (1999) Single-agent vinorelbine in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 26:62–66
Gauvin A, Bressolle F, Martineau P, Astre C, Pinguet F (2002) In vitro schedule-dependent interaction between irinotecan and vinorelbine in NCI H460 non-small cell lung cancer cell line. Anticancer Res 22:905–912
Francis PA, Rigas JR, Kris MG, Pisters KM, Orazem JP, Woolley KJ, Heelan RT (1994) Phase II trial of docetaxel in patients with stage III and IV non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:1232–1237
Fossella FV, Lee JS, Murphy WK, Lippman SM, Calayag M, Pang A, Chasen M, Shin DM, Glisson B, Benner S (1994) Phase II study of docetaxel for recurrent or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 12:1238–1244
Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, Mattson K, Gralla R, O’Rourke M, Levitan N, Gressot L, Vincent M, Burkes R, Coughlin S, Kim Y, Berille J (2000) Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 18:2095–2103
Fossella FV, DeVore R, Kerr RN, Crawford J, Natale RR, Dunphy F, Kalman L, Miller V, Lee JS, Moore M, Gandara D, Karp D, Vokes E, Kris M, Kim Y, Gamza F, Hammershaimb L (2000) Randomized phase III trial of docetaxel versus vinorelbine or ifosfamide in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy regimens. The TAX 320 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Study Group. J Clin Oncol 18:2354–2362
Ohe Y, Ohashi Y, Kubota K, Tamura T, Nakagawa K, Negoro S, Nishiwaki Y, Saijo N, Ariyoshi Y, Fukuoka M (2007) Randomized phase III study of cisplatin plus irinotecan versus carboplatin plus paclitaxel, cisplatin plus gemcitabine, and cisplatin plus vinorelbine for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: four-arm cooperative study in Japan. Ann Oncol 18:317–23
National Cancer Institute (1999) Common toxicity criteria, version 2, Bethesda, National Cancer Institute
Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European organization for research and treatment of cancer, national cancer institute of the United States, national cancer institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216
Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Rigopoulos A, Bountouroglou NG, Koutras A, Glotsos J, Onyenadum A, Makatsoris T, Kalofonos HP (2002) Irinotecan and vinorelbine in patients with non-small cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. A phase II study of the hellenic cooperative oncology group. Anticancer Res 22:3501–3506
Gonzalez Cao M, Aramendia JM, Salgado E, Aristu J, Martinez Monje R, Algarra SM, Ordonez JM, Brugarolas A (2002) Second-line chemotherapy with irinotecan and vinorelbine in stage IIIB and IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study. Am J Clin Oncol 25:480–484
Altaha R, Liang X, Yu JJ, Reed E (2004) Excision repair cross complementing-group 1: gene expression and platinum resistance. Int J Mol Med 14:959–970
Lord RV, Brabender J, Gandara D, Alberola V, Camps C, Domine M, Cardenal F, Sanchez JM, Gumerlock PH, Taron M, Sanchez JJ, Danenberg KD, Danenberg PV, Rosell R (2002) Low ERCC1 expression correlates with prolonged survival after cisplatin plus gemcitabine chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res 8:2286–2291
Olaussen KA, Dunant A, Fouret P, Brambilla E, Andre F, Haddad V, Taranchon E, Filipits M, Pirker R, Popper HH, Stahel R, Sabatier L, Pignon JP, Tursz T, Le Chevalier T, Soria JC; IALT Bio Investigators (2006) DNA repair by ERCC1 in non-small-cell lung cancer and cisplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy. N Engl J Med 355:983–991
Yoh K, Niho S, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Kubota K, Kakinuma R, Nishiwaki Y (2004) High body mass index correlates with increased risk of venous irritation by vinorelbine infusion. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:206–209
Yoh K, Niho S, Goto K, Ohmatsu H, Kubota K, Kakinuma R, Saijo N, Nishiwaki Y (2007) Randomized trial of drip infusion versus bolus injection of vinorelbine for the control of local venous toxicity. Lung Cancer 55:337–341
Vassilomanolakis M, Koumakis G, Barbounis V, Orphanos G, Efremidis A (2001) Prevention of vinorelbine phlebitis with cimetidine. A two-step design study. Support Care Cancer 9:108–111
Mare M, Maisano R, Caristi N, Adamo V, Altavilla G, Carboni R, Munao S, La Torre F (2003) Venous damage prevention by defibrotide in vinorelbine-treated patients. Support Care Cancer 11:593–596
Maisano R, Adamo V, Toscano G, Chiofalo G, Pergolizzi S, Scimone A (1997) Defibrotide in the prevention of venous irritation by vinorelbine administration. Anticancer Res 17:2775–2777
Nakayama S, Matsubara N, Sakai T, Aso N (2002) The incidence of phlebitis in the patients administrated vinorelbine by intravenous bolus injection, a retrospective study. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 29:633–635 (in Japanese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Consortia
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tomonaga, N., Nakamura, Y., Soda, H. et al. Phase I study of vinorelbine and irinotecan in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 62, 43–49 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0571-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-007-0571-z