Skip to main content
Log in

Liver Tissue Dissection: Ultrasonic or RFA Energy?

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Hepatic resection is the only potential curative treatment for a wide variety of conditions. However, liver surgery is technically demanding and closely associated with a number of serious complications. New devices and techniques are currently being applied in practice, which will improve the surgical outcome.

Methods

This retrospective study compares two methods of liver parenchymal division: ultrasound energy, a modern but already widely used technique, and radio-frequency ablation (RFA), a completely novel method. The parameters investigated include the amount of blood transfused, the necessity of the Pringle maneuver, the length of time required for parenchymal division, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. The patients were divided into two groups. In one group (Group A), 15 patients underwent 17 ultrasound-assisted liver resections, in which ten metastatic tumors, six hepatomas, and one cholangiocarcinoma were resected. In Group B, 21 patients underwent 22 RFA-assisted hepatectomies in which 11 metastatic tumors, ten hepatomas, and two cholangiocarcinomas were removed.

Results

Thirteen patients (87%) in Group A and 11 (52%) in Group B received a transfusion, with an average of 3.5 and 1.6 units of red blood cells, respectively. The Pringle maneuver was necessary in two cases in Group A but was unnecessary in Group B. The mean length of time required for parenchymal dissection was 124 min in Group A and 93.18 min in Group  B. One (6.7%) and four (19%) complications were observed in Group A and B, respectively (statistically not significant). Mortality remained zero in both groups.

Conclusions

RFA energy provides a novel reliable and safe alternative that can be used exclusively or as a supplement to the older techniques. Both resection time and amount of blood transfusion were reduced in the RFA group.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fortner JG, Silva JS, Golbey RB, et al. Multivariate analysis of a personal series of 247 consecutive patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Ann Surg 1984;199:306–316

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosen CB, Nagorney DM, Tasmell HF, et al. Perioperative blood transfusion and determinants of survival after liver resection for metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 1992;216:493–504

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Castaing D, Kanstlinger F, Habib N. Intraoperative ultrasound study of liver: methodology and anatomical results. Am J Surg 1985;149:676–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Nagasue N, Yukaya H, Ogama Y, et al. Segmental and subsegmental resections of the cirrhotic liver under hepatic inflow and outflow occlusion. Br J Surg 1981;72:565–568

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buele J, Rosen S, Yoshida A, et al. Hepatic resection: effective treatment for primary and secondary tumors. Surgery 2000;128:686–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nagorney DM, Van Heerden JA, Ilstrud DM, et al. Primary hepatic malignancy: surgical management and determinants of survival. Surgery 1989;106:740–749

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwatsuki S, Sheahan DG, Starzl TE. The changing face of hepatic resection. Curr Probl Surg 1989;25:281–379

    Google Scholar 

  8. Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Gamaletsos E, et al. Total versus selective hepatic vascular exclusion in major liver resections. Am J Surg 2002;183:173–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Smyrniotis V, Kostopanagiotou G, Contis J, et al. Selective hepatic vascular exclusion versus Pringle maneuver in major liver resections: prospective study. World J Surg 2003;27:765–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Torzilli G, Makuuchi M, Midorikawa Y, et al. Liver resection without total vascular exclusion: hazardous or beneficial. An analysis of our experience. Ann Surg 2001;233 :167–175

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heriot AG, Karanjia ND. A review of techniques for liver resection. Ann Roy Coll Surg 2002;84:371–380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber JC, Navarra G, Jiao LR, et al. New technique for liver resection using heat coagulative necrosis. Ann Surg 2002;236:560–563

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lupo L, Callerani A, Aqmline F, et al. Anatomical hepatic resection using radio frequency thermoablation in the treatment of primary or secondary liver tumors. Tumori 2003;89:105–106

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fedorov VD, Vishnevskii VA, Kubyshin VA, et al. Radio–Frequency ablation appliance in resection of the liver. Khirurgiia 2004;5:21–25

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zacharoulis D, Asopa V, Navarra G, et al. Hepatectomy using intraoperative ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation. Int Surg 2003;88:80–82

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Haghighi KS, Wang F, King J, et al. In-line radiofrequency ablation to minimize blood loss in hepatic parenchymal transection. Am J Surg 2005;190:43–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shimada M, Matsumata T, Akazawa K, et al. Estimation of risk of major complications after hepatic resection. Am J Surg 1994;167:399–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Makuuchi M, Takayama T, Gunven P, et al. Restrictive versus liberal blood transfusion policy for hepatectomies in cirrhotic patients. World J Surg 1989;13:644–648

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Felekouras E, Kontos M, Pissanou T, et al. Radio-frequency tissue ablation in liver trauma: an experimental study. Am Surg 2004;70:989–993

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Felekouras E, Papaconstantinou I, Pikoulis E, et al. Laparoscopic liver resection using Radio-frequency ablation (RFA) in a porcine model. Epub 2005 July 28. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1237–1242.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Pikoulis E, Felekouras E, Papaconstantinou I, et al. A novel spleen preserving laparoscopic technique using Radio-frequency ablation (RFA) in a porcine model. Epub 2005 July 21. Surg Endosc 2005;19:1329–1332.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gagner M, Rogula T, Selzer D. Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies. Surg Clin North Am 2004;84:451–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ran HG, Mayer G, Jauch KW, et al. Liver resection with the water jet: conventional and laparoscopic surgery. Chirurg 1996;67:546–551

    Google Scholar 

  24. Yamamoto Y, Ikai I, Kume M, et al. New simple technique for hepatic parenchymal resection using a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator and bipolar cautery equipped with a channel for water dripping. World J Surg 1999;23:1032–1037

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Croce E, Azzola M, Russo R, et al. Laparoscopic liver tumor resection with the argon beam. Endosc Surg Allied Technol 1994;2:186–188

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Di Carlo I, Barbagallo F, Toro A, et al. Hepatic resections using a water-cooled, high-density, monopolar device: a new technology for safer surgery. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:596–600

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trupka A, Halfelldt K, Kalteis T, et al. Open and laparoscopic liver resection with a new ultrasound scalpel. Chirurg 1998;69:1352–1356

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sugo H, Mikami Y, Matsumoto F, et al. Hepatic resection using the harmonic scalpel. How to do it. Surg Today 2000;30:959–962

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Evangelos Prassas MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Felekouras, E., Prassas, E., Kontos, M. et al. Liver Tissue Dissection: Ultrasonic or RFA Energy?. World J. Surg. 30, 2210–2216 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0468-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-005-0468-0

Keywords

Navigation