Skip to main content
Log in

Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labor is common across social groups. In social insects, many studies focus on the differentiation of in-nest and foraging workers and/or the division of foraging tasks. Few studies have specifically examined how workers divide in-nest tasks. In the bumble bee, Bombus impatiens, we have shown previously that smaller workers are more likely to feed larvae and incubate brood, whereas larger workers are more likely to fan or guard the nest. Here, we show that in spite of this, B. impatiens workers generally perform multiple tasks throughout their life. The size of this task repertoire size does not depend on body size, nor does it change with age. Further, individuals were more likely to perform the task they had been performing on the previous day than any other task, a pattern most pronounced among individuals who guarded the nest. On the other hand, there was no predictable sequence of task switching. Because workers tend to remain in the same region of the nest over time, in-nest workers may concentrate on a particular task, or subset of tasks, inside that region. This division of space, then, may be an important mechanism that leads to this weak specialization among in-nest bumble bee workers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alford DV (1978) The life of the bumblebee. Davis-Poynter, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Beshers SN, Fewell JH (2001) Models of division of labor in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol 46:413–440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brian AD (1952) Division of labour and foraging in Bombus agrorum Fabricius. J Anim Ecol 21:223–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SA (1989) Temporal patterns of division of labor among workers in the primitively eusocial bumble bee, Bombus griseocollis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ethology 80:137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron SA, Robinson GE (1990) Juvenile hormone does not affect division of labor in bumble bee colonies (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 83:626–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A (2008) Specialization does not predict individual efficiency in an ant. PLOS 6:2368–2375

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhaus A, Holley J-A, Franks NR (2009) Larger colonies do not have more specialized workers in the ant Temnothorax albipennis. Behav Ecol (in press)

  • Fewell JH, Page RE Jr (1999) The emergence of division of labour in forced associations of normally solitary ant queens. Evol Ecol Res 1:537–548

    Google Scholar 

  • Free JB (1955) The division of labour within bumblebee colonies. Insect Soc 11:195–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick R, Bertram SM, Killeen P, Fewell JH (2004) Normalized mutual entropy in biology: quantifying division of labor. Am Nat 164:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gorelick R, Bertram SM (2007) Quantifying division of labor: borrowing tools from sociology, sociobiology, information theory, landscape ecology, and biogeography. Insect Soc 54:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goulson D, Peat J, Stout JC, Tucker J, Darvill B, Derwent LC, Hughes WO (2002) Can alloethism in workers of the bumblebee, Bombus terrestris, be explained in terms of foraging efficiency? Anim Behav 64:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (1975) Thermoregulation in bumblebees II. Energetic of warm-up and free flight. J Comp Physiol 96:155–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich B (2004) Bumblebee economics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölldobler B, Wilson EO (1998) The ants. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jandt JM, Dornhaus A (2009) Spatial organization and division of labor in the bumble bee, Bombus impatiens. Anim Behav 77:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeanson R, Kukuk PF, Fewell JH (2005) Emergence of division of labour in halictine bees: contributions of social interactions and behavioural variance. Anim Behav 70:1183–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson BR (2008) Within-nest temporal polyethism in the honey bee. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:777–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julian GE, Cahan S (1999) Undertaking specialization in the desert leaf-cutter ant Acromyrmex versicolor. Anim Behav 58:437–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lehner PN (1996) Handbook of ethological methods, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Noirot C, Pasteels JM (1987) Ontogenetic development and evolution of the worker caste in termites. Experientia 43:851–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Jeanne RL (1990) Forager specialization and the control of nest repair in Polybia occidentalis Olivier (Hymenoptera: Vespidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol 27:359–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell S, Reichardt M, Foster R (2000) Individual and colony factors in bumble bee division of labor (Bombus bifarius nearcticus Handl; Hymenoptera, Apidae). Insect Soc 47:164–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raine NE, Chittka L (2007) Pollen foraging: learning a complex motor skill by bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Naturwissenschaften 94:459–464

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson GE (1987) Regulation of honey bee age polyethism by juvenile hormone. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 20:329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeley TD (1982) Adaptive significance of the age polyethism schedule in honeybee colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 11:287–293. doi:10.1007/BF00299306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seid MA, Traniello JFA (2006) Age-related repertoire expansion and division of labor in Pheidole dentate (Hymenoptera: Formicidae): a new perspective on temporal polyethism and behavioral plasticity in ants. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:631–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slater PJB (1973) Describing sequences of behavior. In: Bateson PPP, Klopfer PH (eds) Perspectives in ethology, vol 1. Plenum, New York, pp 131–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Brockmann A, Halbig C, Tautz J (2007) Size determines antennal sensitivity and behavioral threshold to odors in bumblebee workers. Naturwissenschaften 94:733–739

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Chittka L (2003) Interindividual variation of eye optics and single object resolution in bumblebees. J Exp Biol 206:3447–3453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spaethe J, Weidenmüller A (2002) Size variation and foraging rate in bumblebees (Bombus terrestris). Insect Soc 49:142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern DL, Foster WA (1997) The evolution of sociality in aphids: a clone’s-eye view. In: Choe JC, Crespi BJ (eds) The evolution of social behavior in insects and arachnids. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 150–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Withers GS, Fahrbach SE, Robinson GE (1993) Selective neuroanatomical plasticity and division of labour in the honeybee. Nature 364:238–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Worden BD, Skemp AK, Papaj DR (2005) Learning in two contexts: the effects of interference and body size in bumblebees. J Exp Biol 208:2045–2053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yerushalmi S, Bodenhaimer S, Bloch G (2006) Developmentally determined attenuation in circadian rhythms links chronobiology to social organization in bees. J Exp Biol 209:1044–1051

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Root Gorelick for his help calculating the division of labor index. We thank Nicolas Skye Robbins, Amanda Barth, and Wendy Isner for their help in data collection and assistance with bumble bee maintenance. Margaret Couvillon, Tuan Cao, Nhi Duong, Annie Leonard, and Emily Jones provided useful feedback on the manuscript. This research was supported through the College of Science, Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, University of Arizona.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer M. Jandt.

Additional information

Communicated by R. Moritz

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jandt, J.M., Huang, E. & Dornhaus, A. Weak specialization of workers inside a bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) nest. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 1829–1836 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0810-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0810-x

Keywords

Navigation