Skip to main content
Log in

Atypical homing or self-odour avoidance? Blue petrels (Halobaena caerulea) are attracted to their mate’s odour but avoid their own

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Among procellariiform seabirds, many burrowing petrels show good olfactory abilities especially in recognising their nest. In particular, it has been reported that Antarctic prions (Pachyptila desolata) discriminate their own and their mate’s odours and, in Y-maze experiments, prefer the odour of a conspecific bird to their own. While traditionally examined from the perspective of homing mechanisms, these recent results have drawn attention to the possible use of chemical signals in birds’ social behaviours. Indeed, the life history of petrels suggests that a mate choice mediated by olfactory mechanisms may have evolved in this group to ensure genetic compatibility. This study was undertaken to validate and extend results obtained on petrels’ olfactory discrimination capabilities. Following the Y-maze experiment protocol, blue petrels (Halobaena caerulea) were offered three different choices: (1) mate versus conspecific’s odour, (2) own versus mate’s odour and (3) own versus conspecific’s odour. We discovered that birds prefer the odour of their mate not only when presented against conspecific’s odour but also against their own. We further verified that blue petrels also avoid their own odour when presented against conspecific’s odour. Our results confirm that olfactory discrimination in burrowing petrels goes beyond self-recognition and that self-odour avoidance may be widespread. We use two mutually non-exclusive behavioural frameworks for the interpretation of our results, homing and mate choice, and explain why homing mechanisms cannot account for all of our observations. This study opens the door to further research on olfactory mechanisms that, in petrels, might mediate individual recognition and mate choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aubin T, Jouventin P, Hildebrand C (2000) Penguins use the two-voice system to recognize each other. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:1081–1087

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bang BG (1966) The olfactory apparatus of tubenosed birds (Procellariiformes). Acta Anat 65:391–415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomqvist D, Andersson M, Kupper C, Cuthill IC, Kis J, Lanctot RB, Sandercock BK, Szekely T, Wallander J, Kempenaers B (2002) Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613–615

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonadonna F (2008) Olfaction in petrels: from homing to self-odor avoidance. Ann NY Acad Sci (in press)

  • Bonadonna F, Nevitt GA (2004) Partner-specific odor recognition in an Antarctic seabird. Science 306:835

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonadonna F, Cunningham GB, Jouventin P, Hesters F, Nevitt GA (2003a) Evidence for nest-odour recognition in two species of diving petrel. J Exp Biol 206:3719–3722

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bonadonna F, Hesters F, Jouventin P (2003b) Scent of a nest: discrimination of own-nest odours in Antarctic prions, Pachyptila desolata. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 54:174–178

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonadonna F, Villafane M, Bajzak C, Jouventin P (2004) Recognition of burrow’s “olfactory signature” in blue petrels, Halobaena caerulea: an efficient discrimination mechanism in the dark. Anim Behav 67:893–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonadonna F, Miguel E, Grosbois V, Jouventin P, Bessiere J-M (2007) Individual odor recognition in birds: an endogenous olfactory signature on petrels’ feathers? J Chem Ecol 33:1819–1829

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bonneaud C, Chastel O, Federici P, Westerdahl H, Sorci G (2006) Complex MHC-based mate choice in a wild passerine. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:1111–1116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bretagnolle V (1989) Calls of Wilson's storm petrel: functions, individual and sexual recognitions, and geographic variation. Behaviour 111:98–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bried J, Jouventin P (2002) Site and mate-choice in seabirds: an evolutionary approach. In: Schreiber EA, Burger J (eds) Biology of marine birds. CRC, Boca, pp 263–305

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown JL, Eklund A (1994) Kin recognition and the major histocompatibility complex—an integrative review. Am Nat 143:435–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R (1982) The extended phenotype. Freeman, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • De Leon A, Minguez E, Belliure B (2003) Self-odour recognition in European storm-petrel chicks. Behaviour 140:925–933

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenoglio S, Cucco M, Fracchia L, Martinotti MG, Malacarne G (2004) Shield colours of the Moorhen are differently related to bacterial presence and health parameters. Ethol Ecol Evol 16:171–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Galeotti P, Saino N, Sacchia R, MØller AP (1997) Song correlates with social context, testosterone and body condition in male barn swallows. Anim Behav 53:687–700

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genevois F, Bretagnolle V (1994) Male blue petrels reveal their body weight when calling. Ethol Ecol Evol 6:377–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb TC (1974) Olfactory navigation to the nesting burrow in Leach’s petrel (Oceanodroma leucorrhoa). Anim Behav 22:192–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hauber ME, Sherman PW, Paprika D (2000) Self-referent phenotype matching in a brood parasite: the armpit effect in brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). Anim Cogn 3:133–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heth G, Todrank J, Johnston RE (1998) Kin recognition in golden hamsters: evidence for phenotype matching. Anim Behav 56:409–417

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen A, Andersen V, Sunding C, Lifjeld JT (2000) Female bluethroats enhance offspring immunocompetence through extra-pair copulations. Nature 406:296–299

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jouventin P, Mouret V, Bonadonna F (2007) Wilson’s storm petrels Oceanites oceanicus recognise the olfactory signature of their mate. Ethology 113:1228–1232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mateo JM, Johnston RE (2000) Kin recognition and the ‘armpit effect’: evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc R Soc Lond B 267:695–700

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith J, Harper D (2003) Animal signals. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Minguez E (1997) Olfactory recognition by British storm-petrel chicks. Anim Behav 53:701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot F, Bretagnolle V (2000a) Predation as a cost of sexual communication in nocturnal seabirds: an experimental approach using acoustic signals. Anim Behav 60:647–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mougeot F, Bretagnolle V (2000b) Predation risk and moonlight avoidance in nocturnal seabirds. J Avian Biol 31:376–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nevitt GA, Bonadonna F (2005) Seeing the world trough the nose of a bird: new developments in the sensory ecology of procellariiform seabirds. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 287:292–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaus M, Bohec CL, Nolan PM, Gauthier-Clerc M, Maho YL, Komdeur J, Jouventin P (2007) Ornamental colors reveal age in the king penguin. Polar Biol 31:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nolan PM, Jouventin P, Dobson FS (2004) Plumage color predicts immune response in king penguins. Integr Comp Biol 44:612–612

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson M, Madsen T, Nordby J, Wapstra E, Ujvari B, Wittsell H (2003) Major histocompatibility complex and mate choice in sand lizards. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 270(Suppl):S254–S256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penn D (2002) The scent of genetic compatibility: sexual selection and the major histocompatibility complex. Ethology 108:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryke SR, Griffith SC (2006) Red dominates black: agonistic signalling among head morphs in the colour polymorphic Gouldian finch. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:949–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper TJ (1999) Olfaction in birds. Adv Study Behav 28:247–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh PB (2001) Chemosensation and genetic individuality. Reproduction 121:529–539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tregenza T, Wedell N (2000) Genetic compatibility, mate choice and patterns of parentage: invited review. Mol Ecol 9:1013–1027

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Warham J (1996) The behaviour, population biology and physiology of the petrels. Academic, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyatt TD (2003) Pheromones and animal behaviour. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK (2005) Chemosensory recognition of olfactory individuality. Chem Senses 30:142–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelano B, Edwards VE (2002) An MHC component to kin recognition and mate choice in birds: predictions, progress, and prospects. Am Nat 160:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV, Program no. 354). This study was performed according to guidelines established by IPEV and CNRS for the Ethical Treatment of Animals and complied with current French regulations. We thank Dr. Sandra Saunders and two reviewers for their criticism of earlier drafts of the manuscript. Giulia Giaconi (the grand mother of FB) graciously sewed the cotton bags.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jérôme Mardon.

Additional information

Communicated by K. Lindström

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mardon, J., Bonadonna, F. Atypical homing or self-odour avoidance? Blue petrels (Halobaena caerulea) are attracted to their mate’s odour but avoid their own. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 63, 537–542 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0688-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-008-0688-z

Keywords

Navigation