Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-prone hunting by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) increases during periods of high diet quality

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most studies suggest that during times of nutritional stress, an animal faced with two foraging choices should follow a risk-prone strategy, choosing the option with highest payoff variance. This “scarcity/risk” hypothesis was developed to account for the foraging patterns of small animals with high metabolic rates susceptible to the threat of starvation. In this paper, we propose that animals should also be risk-prone when their diet quality is particularly high, far exceeding that which is needed to survive. Under these circumstances, the costs of experiencing a low or negative payoff can easily be recouped. We suggest that large-bodied omnivores are most likely to adopt this “abundance/risk” strategy. We investigate this question among wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) that choose between a risk-averse strategy of feeding on plant material and a risk-prone strategy of hunting red colobus monkeys. Using 14 years of data on the Kanyawara chimpanzees of Kibale National Park, Uganda, we find strong evidence that chimpanzees follow the “abundance/risk” strategy. Both hunting rate (hunts/100 observation hours) and the probability of hunting upon encountering red colobus monkeys were positively correlated with seasonal consumption of ripe drupe fruits, a class of preferred food associated with elevated reproductive performance by females. Critically, these results remained statistically significant after controlling for the potentially confounding effects of male chimpanzee party size and the presence of sexually receptive females. These findings suggest that the relationship between risk-sensitive foraging and diet quality depends upon the daily probability of starvation, the number of alternative foraging strategies, and the degree to which diet quality satisfies an animal’s nutritional requirements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson DP, Nordheim EV, Boesch C, Moermond TC (2002) Factors influencing fission–fusion grouping in chimpanzees in the Taï National Park, Côte d’Ivoire. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 90–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M (2002) Recent advances in our understanding of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Proc Nutr Soc 61:509–516

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson M, Kacelnik A (1998) Risk-sensitive foraging: decision making in variable environments. In: Dukas R (ed) Cognitive ecology. Chicago University Press, Chicago, IL, pp 297–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C, Boesch H (1989) Hunting behavior of wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park. Am J Phys Anthropol 78:547–573

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch C, Boesch-Achermann H (2000) The chimpanzees of the Taï Forest. Behavioural ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Busse CD (1977) Chimpanzee predation as a possible factor in the evolution of red colobus monkey social organization. Evolution 31:907–911

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caraco T, Blanckenhorn WU, Gregory GM, Newman JA, Recer GM, Zwicker SM (1990) Risk-sensitivity: ambient temperature affects foraging choice. Anim Behav 39:338–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cartar RV, Dill LM (1990) Why are bumblebees risk sensitive foragers? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 26:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Fedigan LM (1990) Dietary differences between neighboring Cebus capuchinus groups: local traditions, food availability or responses to food profitability? Folia Primatol 54:177–186

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, White FJ, Wrangham RW (1994) Party size in chimpanzees and bonobos: a re-evaluation of theory based on two similarly forested sites. In: Wrangham RW, McGrew WC, de Waal FBM, Heltne PG (eds) Chimpanzee cultures. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 41–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Chapman LJ (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:59–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin-Brittain NL, Wrangham RW, Hunt KD (1998) Dietary response of chimpanzees and cercopithecines to seasonal variation in fruit abundance. II. Macronutrients. Int J Primatol 19:971–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croy MI, Hughes RN (1991) Effects of food supply, hunger, danger and competition on choice of foraging location by the fifteen-spined stickleback, Spinachia spinachia. Anim Behav 42:131–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emery Thompson M (2005) Endocrinology and ecology of wild female chimpanzee reproduction. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Anthropology, Harvard University, Cambridge

  • Emery Thompson M, Wrangham RW (2006) Comparison of sex differences in gregariousness in fission–fusion species: reducing bias by standardizing for party size. In: Newton-Fisher NE, Notman H, Paterson JD, Reynolds V (eds) Primates of Western Uganda. Springer, New York, pp 209–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Fedigan LM (1990) Vertebrate predation in Cebus capuchinus: meat eating in a neotropical monkey. Folia Primatol 54:196–205

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gilby IC (2004) Hunting and meat sharing among the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park, Tanzania. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota

  • Gilby IC, Eberly LE, Pintea L, Pusey AE (2006) Ecological and social influences on the hunting behaviour of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii). Anim Behav 72:169–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodall J (1986) The chimpanzees of Gombe: patterns of behavior. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Kacelnik A, Bateson M (1996) Risky theories—the effects of variance on foraging decisions. Am Zool 36:402–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissui BM, Packer C (2004) Top-down population regulation of a top predator: lions in the Ngorongoro Crater. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:1867–1874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto-Oda A (1999) Mahale chimpanzees: grouping patterns and cycling females. Am J Primatol 47:197–207

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto-Oda A, Hosaka K, Huffman MA, Kawanaka K (1998) Factors affecting party size in chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. Int J Primatol 19:999–1011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milton K (2003) The critical role played by animal source foods in human (Homo) evolution. J Nutr 133:3886S–3892S

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Watts DP (2001) Why do chimpanzees hunt and share meat? Anim Behav 61:915–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Watts DP (2005) Seasonality in hunting by non-human primates. In: Brockman DK, van Schaik CP (eds) Seasonality in primates: studies of living and extinct human and non-human primates. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 215–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitani JC, Watts DP, Lwanga JS (2002) Ecological and social correlates of chimpanzee party size and composition. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 102–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Nevin OT, Gilbert BK (2005) Measuring the cost of risk avoidance in brown bears: further evidence of positive impacts of ecotourism. Biol Conserv 123:453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T (1968) The social group of wild chimpanzees in the Mahali mountains. Primates 9:167–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishida T, Uehara S, Nyundo R (1979) Predatory behavior among wild chimpanzees of the Mahale mountains. Primates 20:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odonoghue M, Boutin S, Krebs CJ, Hofer EJ (1997) Numerical responses of coyotes and lynx to the snowshoe hare cycle. Oikos 80:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontzer H, Wrangham RW (2004) Climbing and the daily energy cost of locomotion in wild chimpanzees: implications for hominoid locomotor evolution. J Hum Evol 46:317–335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pusey AE, Oehlert GW, Williams JM, Goodall J (2005) Influence of ecological and social factors on body mass of wild chimpanzees. Int J Primatol 26:3–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose LM (1997) Vertebrate predation and food-sharing in Cebus and Pan. Int J Primatol 18:727–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherry DN (2002) Reproductive seasonality in chimpanzees and humans: ultimate and proximate factors. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

  • Stanford CB (1995) The influence of chimpanzee predation on group size and anti-predator behaviour in red colobus monkeys. Anim Behav 49:577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford CB (1998) Chimpanzee and red colobus. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford CB, Wallis J, Mpongo E, Goodall J (1994) Hunting decisions in wild chimpanzees. Behaviour 131:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Stephens DW (1981) The logic of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Anim Behav 29:628–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahata Y, Hasegawa T, Nishida T (1984) Chimpanzee predation in the Mahale mountains from August 1979 to May 1982. Int J Primatol 5:213–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Uehara S (1997) Predation on mammals by the chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes). Primates 38:193–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallis J (1997) A survey of reproductive parameters in the free-ranging chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. J Reprod Fertil 109:297–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watts DP, Mitani JC (2002a) Hunting and meat sharing by chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 244–255

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts DP, Mitani JC (2002b) Hunting behavior of chimpanzees at Ngogo, Kibale National Park, Uganda. Int J Primatol 23:1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson ML (2001) Imbalances of power: how chimpanzees respond to the threat of intergroup aggression. Ph.D. thesis, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA

  • Wrangham RW (1977) Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In: Clutton-Brock TH (ed) Primate ecology: studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys and apes. Academic, London, pp 503–538

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW (2000) Why are male chimpanzees more gregarious than mothers? A scramble competition hypothesis. In: Kappeler PM (ed) Primate males: causes and consequences of variation in group composition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 248–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW (2002) The cost of sexual attraction: is there a trade-off in female Pan between sex appeal and received coercion? In: Boesch C, Hohmann G, Marchant L (eds) Behavioural diversity in chimpanzees and bonobos. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 204–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Smuts B (1980) Sex differences in the behavioral ecology of chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park, Tanzania. J Reprod Fertil (Suppl) 28:13–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Conklin NL, Chapman CA, Hunt KD (1991) The significance of fibrous foods for Kibale Forest chimpanzees. Philos Trans R Soc B 334:171–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Chapman CA, Clark-Arcadi AP, Isabirye-Basuta G (1996) Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups. In: Nishida T (ed) Great ape societies. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 45–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham RW, Conklin-Brittain NL, Hunt KD (1998) Dietary response of chimpanzees and cercopithecines to seasonal variation in fruit abundance: I. Antifeedants. Int J Primatol 19:949–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Long-term research at Kanyawara was supported by funding from NSF Grant 0416125 to R. Wrangham. I. Gilby was also partially supported by NSF Grant 115-0431141. We thank the Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, the Uganda Wildlife Authority, and the Makerere University Biological Field Station for permission to conduct research within Kibale National Park. The research complies with the current laws of Uganda. This project would not have been possible without the hard work and dedication of the field research team, especially Francis Mugurusi, Christopher Muruuli, Peter Tuhairwe, Christopher Katongole, and the late Donor Muhangyi and John Barwogeza, as well as field managers Michael Wilson, Martin Muller, Katherin Pieta, Carole Hooven, Kimberly Duffy, and Emily Otali. We are grateful to David Watts and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments on an earlier version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian C. Gilby.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Watts

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilby, I.C., Wrangham, R.W. Risk-prone hunting by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii) increases during periods of high diet quality. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61, 1771–1779 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0410-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-007-0410-6

Keywords

Navigation