Skip to main content
Log in

Five-year results of the Innex total knee arthroplasty system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The clinical and radiographic results of 174 female and 86 male Innex (Zimmer, Warsaw, Indiana) mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty systems (245 patients) were evaluated, with particular emphasis on gender-related differences at five-year follow-up. Pre-operative Knee Society (KS) function and total scores were lower in women than in men. All KS scores showed a significant improvement at follow-up, but women still obtained lower KS function scores than men. Self-reported function was significantly better for male knees. No gender differences were observed for component alignment, while the occurrence of radiolucent lines, endosteal cavitations, and wear was significantly greater in male knees. Male Innex mobile bearing knees exhibited better clinical function and satisfaction than their female peers at five-year follow-up, despite inferior radiographic findings and higher revision rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson JG, Wixson RL, Tsai D et al (1996) Functional outcome and patient satisfaction in total knee patients over the age of 75. J Arthroplasty 11:831–840

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Asif S, Choon DSK (2005) Midterm results of cemented press fit condylar Sigma total knee arthroplasty system. J Orthop Surg 13:280–284

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Australian Orthopaedic Association Joint Replacement Registry (2007) 2007 annual report. Available at: http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/. Accessed 8 September 2009

  4. Bauman S, Williams D, Petruccelli D et al (2007) Physical activity after total joint replacement: a cross-sectional survey. Clin J Sports Med 17:104–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chana R, Shenava Y, Nicholl AP et al (2008) Five- to 8-year results of the uncemented Duracon total knee arthoplasty system. J Arthroplasty 23:677–682

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwald FC (1989) The knee society total knee arthroplasty roentgenographic evaluation and scoring system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:9–12

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greene KA (2007) Gender-specific design in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 22:27–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gyssler BG (2004) Developing a mobile bearing knee prosthesis. In: Munzinger UK, Boldt J, Keblish P (eds) Primary knee arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin, pp 18–24

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hawker G, Wright J, Coyte P et al (1998) Health-related quality of life after knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:163–173

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hawker GA, Wright JG, Coyte PC et al (2000) Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 342:1016–1022

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrysson OLA, Robertsson O, Nayfesh JF (2004) Higher cumulative revision rate of knee arthroplasties in younger patients with osteoarthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 421:162–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Heck DA, Robinson RL, Partridge CM et al (1998) Patient outcomes after knee replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 356:93–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Horwitz MD, Awan S, Chatoo MB et al (2009) An 8- to 10-year review of the Rotaglide total knee replacement. Int Orthop 33:111–115

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Huck SW (2004) Reading statistics and research. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hudd A, Kunasingam K, Ricketts D et al (2009) A 5 to 8 year follow-up study of the Rotaglide mobile bearing total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 33:675–678

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Indelli PF, Aglietti P, Buzzi R et al (2002) The Insall-Burstein II prosthesis. A 5- to 9-year follow-up study in osteoarthritic knees. J Arthroplasty 17:544–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Insall JN, Dorr LD, Scott RD et al (1989) (1989) Rationale of the knee society clinical rating system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 248:13–14

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Institute for Evaluative Researchin Orthopaedic Surgery (IEFO) (2005) International documentation and evaluation system forms. Available at: http://www.siris-implant.ch/index.php?id=86&L=2. Accessed 8 September 2009

  19. Karlson EW, Daltroy LH, Liang MH et al (1997) Gender differences in patient preference may underlie differential utilization of elective surgery. Am J Med 102:524–530

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lim JTK, Luscombe KL, Jones PW et al (2006) The effect of pre-operative symptom severity on functional outcome of total knee replacement-patients with the lowest pre-operative scores achieve the lowest marks. Knee 13:216–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. MacDonald SJ, Charron KD, Bourne RB et al (2008) Gender-specific total knee replacement. Prospectively collected clinical outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466:2612–2616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Paterson D (1993) International documentation and evaluation system. Clin Orthop Relat Res 290:306–307

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rand JA, Illstrup DM (1991) Survivorship analysis of total knee arthroplasty. Cumulative rates of survival of 9200 total knee arthroplasties. J Bone J Surg Am 73:397–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ritter MA, Wing JT, Berend ME et al (2008) The clinical effect of gender on outcome of total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 23:331–336

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Robertsson O, Dunbar M, Pehrsson T et al (2000) Patient satisfaction after knee arthroplasty. A report on 27372 knees operated on between 1981 and 1995 in Sweden. Acta Orthop Scand 71:262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Robinson RP (2005) Five-year follow-up of primary Optetrak posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasties in osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 20:927–931

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Röder C, Eggli S, EL-Kerdi A et al (2003) The international documentation and evaluation system (IDES)—10-years experience. Int Orthop 27:259–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Ms. Kirsten Dobson for the English revision of this manuscript. The Schulthess Clinic received royalties from Zimmer in partial support of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicola A. Maffiuletti.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Munzinger, U.K., Maffiuletti, N.A., Guggi, T. et al. Five-year results of the Innex total knee arthroplasty system. International Orthopaedics (SICOT) 34, 1159–1165 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0887-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-009-0887-x

Keywords

Navigation