Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Memory T cells are uniquely resistant to melanoma-induced suppression

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We have previously observed that in vivo exposure to growing melanoma tumors fundamentally alters activated T cell homeostasis by suppressing the ability of naïve T cells to undergo antigen-driven proliferative expansion. We hypothesized that exposure of T cells in later stages of differentiation to melanoma would have similar suppressive consequences. C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with media or syngeneic B16F10 melanoma tumors 8 or 60 days after infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), and splenic populations of LCMV-specific T cells were quantified using flow cytometry 18 days after tumor inoculation. Inoculation with melanoma on post-infection day 8 potentiated the contraction of previously activated T cells. This enhanced contraction was associated with increased apoptotic susceptibility among T cells from tumor-bearing mice. In contrast, inoculation with melanoma on post-infection day 60 did not affect the ability of previously established memory T cells to maintain themselves in stable numbers. In addition, the ability of previously established memory T cells to respond to LCMV challenge was unaffected by melanoma. Following adoptive transfer into melanoma-bearing mice, tumor-specific memory T cells were significantly more effective at controlling melanoma growth than equivalent numbers of tumor-specific effector T cells. These observations suggest that memory T cells are uniquely resistant to suppressive influences exerted by melanoma on activated T cell homeostasis; these findings may have implications for T cell–based cancer immunotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Murali-Krishna K, Altman JD, Suresh M, Sourdive DJ, Zajac AJ, Miller JD, Slansky J, Ahmed R (1998) Counting antigen-specific CD8 T cells: a reevaluation of bystander activation during viral infection. Immunity 8:177–187

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaech SM, Wherry EJ, Ahmed R (2002) Effector and memory T-cell differentiation: implications for vaccine development. Nat Rev Immunol 2:251–262

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wherry EJ, Teichgräber V, Becker TC, Masopust D, Kaech SM, Antia R, von Andrian UH, Ahmed R (2003) Lineage relationship and protective immunity of memory CD8 T cell subsets. Nat Immunol 4:225–234

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Sarkar S, Teichgräber V, Kalia V, Polley A, Masopust D, Harrington LE, Ahmed R, Wherry EJ (2007) Strength of stimulus and clonal competition impact the rate of memory CD8 T cell differentiation. J Immunol 179:6704–6714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi NS, Cui W, Chandele A, Lee HK, Urso DR, Hagman J, Gapin L, Kaech SM (2007) Inflammation directs memory precursor and short-lived effector CD8(+) T cell fates via the graded expression of T-bet transcription factor. Immunity 27:281–295

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Singh A, Jatzek A, Plisch EH, Srinivasan R, Svaren J, Suresh M (2010) Regulation of memory CD8 T-cell differentiation by cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27Kip1. Mol Cell Biol 30:5145–5159

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Robbins PF, Yang JC, Hwu P, Schwartzentruber DJ, Topalian SL, Sherry R, Restifo NP, Hubicki AM, Robinson MR, Raffeld M, Duray P, Seipp CA, Rogers-Freezer L, Morton KE, Mavroukakis SA, White DE, Rosenberg SA (2002) Cancer regression and autoimmunity in patients after clonal repopulation with antitumor lymphocytes. Science 298:850–854

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Morgan RA, Dudley ME, Wunderlich JR, Hughes MS, Yang JC, Sherry RM, Royal RE, Topalian SL, Kammula US, Restifo NP, Zheng Z, Nahvi A, de Vries CR, Rogers-Freezer LJ, Mavroukakis SA, Rosenberg SA (2006) Cancer regression in patients after transfer of genetically engineered lymphocytes. Science 314:126–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rosenberg SA, Dudley ME (2009) Adoptive cell therapy for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma. Curr Opin Immunol 21:233–240

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dudley ME, Gross CA, Langhan MM, Garcia MR, Sherry RM, Yang JC, Phan GQ, Kammula US, Hughes MS, Citrin DE, Restifo NP, Wunderlich JR, Prieto PA, Hong JJ, Langan RC, Zlott DA, Morton KE, White DE, Laurencot CM, Rosenberg SA (2010) CD8+ enriched “young” tumor infiltrating lymphocytes can mediate regression of metastatic melanoma. Clin Cancer Res 16:6122–6131

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Garbe C, Eigentler TK, Keilholz U, Hauschild A, Kirkwood JM (2011) Systematic review of medical treatment in melanoma: current status and future prospects. Oncologist 16:5–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rosenberg SA, Restifo NP, Yang JC, Morgan RA, Dudley ME (2008) Adoptive cell transfer: a clinical path to effective cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer 8:299–308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dudley ME, Rosenberg SA (2003) Adoptive cell-transfer therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer. Nat Rev Cancer 3:666–675

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yee C, Thompson JA, Byrd D, Riddell SR, Roche P, Celis E, Greenberg PD (2002) Adoptive T cell therapy using antigen-specific CD8+ T cell clones for the treatment of patients with metastatic melanoma: in vivo persistence, migration, and antitumor effect of transferred cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:16168–16173

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dunn GP, Old LJ, Schreiber RD (2004) The three Es of cancer immunoediting. Annu Rev Immunol 22:329–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schreiber RD, Old LJ, Smyth MJ (2011) Cancer immunoediting: integrating immunity’s roles in cancer suppression and progression. Science 331:1565–1570

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Quezada SA, Peggs KS, Simpson TR, Allison JR (2011) Shifting the equilibrium in cancer immunoediting: from tumor tolerance to eradication. Immunol Rev 241:104–118

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Russ AJ, Wentworth L, Xu K, Rakhmilevich A, Seroogy CM, Sondel PM, Suresh M, Cho CS (2011) Suppression of T-cell expansion by melanoma is exerted on resting cells. Ann Surg Oncol 18:3848–3857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Russ AJ, Xu K, Wentworth L, Alam S, Meyers JV, Macklin MD, Rakhmilevich AL, Suresh M, Cho CS (2011) Melanoma-induced suppression of tumor antigen-specific T cell expansion is comparable to suppression of global T cell expansion. Cell Immunol 271:104–109

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tan JT, Ernst B, Kieper WC, LeRoy E, Sprent J, Surh CD (2002) Interleukin (IL)-15 and IL-7 jointly regulate homeostatic proliferation of memory phenotype CD8+ cells but are not required for memory phenotype CD4+ cells. J Exp Med 195:1523–1532

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Surh CD, Bowman O, Purton JF, Sprent J (2006) Homeostasis of memory T cells. Immunol Rev 211:154–163

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Nanjappa SG, Walent JH, Morre M, Suresh M (2008) Effects of IL-7 on memory CD8 T cell homeostasis are influenced by the timing of therapy in mice. J Clin Invest 118:1027–1039

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zhou J, Nagarkatti P, Zhong Y, Nagarkatti M (2011) Characterization of T-cell memory phenotype after in vitro expansion of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes from melanoma patients. Anticancer Res 31:4099–4109

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hotta K, Sho M, Fujimoto K, Shimada K, Yamato I, Anai S, Konishi N, Hirao Y, Nonomura K, Nakajima Y (2011) Prognostic significance of CD45RO+ memory T cells in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer 105:1191–1196

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Peng RQ, Wu XJ, Ding Y, Li CY, Yu XJ, Zhang X, Pan ZZ, Wan DS, Zheng LM, Zeng YX, Zhang XS (2010) Co-expression of nuclear and cytoplasmic HMGB1 is inversely associated with infiltration of CD45RO+ T cells and prognosis in patients with stage IIIB colon cancer. BMC Cancer 10:496

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perret R, Ronchese F (2008) Memory T cells in cancer immunotherapy: which CD8 T-cell population provides the best protection against tumours? Tissue Antigens 72:187–194

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Klebanoff CA, Gattinoni L, Torabi-Parizi P, Kerstann K, Cardones AR, Finkelstein SE, Palmer DC, Antony PA, Hwang ST, Rosenberg SA, Waldhamm TA, Restifo NP (2005) Central memory self/tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells confer superior antitumor immunity compared with effector memory T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:9571–9576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by grant support from the Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Health Administration, Office of Research and Development, Biomedical Science Research and Development Service, Career Development Award (CDA-2), American College of Surgeons Faculty Research Fellowship, and Central Surgical Association Foundation Grant to CSC, and by support from NIH Grant AI48785 to MS.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest; the contents of this work do not represent the views of the Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Clifford S. Cho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wentworth, L., Meyers, J.V., Alam, S. et al. Memory T cells are uniquely resistant to melanoma-induced suppression. Cancer Immunol Immunother 62, 149–159 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1326-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00262-012-1326-1

Keywords

Navigation