Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetization transfer analysis of cartilage repair tissue: a preliminary study

  • Scientific Article
  • Published:
Skeletal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) after two different cartilage repair procedures, and to compare these data with the MTR of normal cartilage.

Design and patients

Twenty-seven patients with a proven cartilage defect were recruited: 13 were treated with autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) and 14 were treated with the microfracture technique (MFR). All patients underwent MRI examinations with MT-sequences before the surgical treatment, after 12 months (26 patients) and after 24 months (11 patients). Eleven patients received a complete follow-up study at all three time points (five of the ACI group and six of the MFR group). All images were transferred to a workstation to calculate MTR images. For every MT image set, different ROIs were delineated by two radiologists. Means were calculated per ROI type in the different time frames and in both groups of cartilage repair. The data were analyzed with unpaired t- and ANOVA tests, and by calculating Pearson’s correlation coefficient.

Results

No significant differences were found in the MTR of fatty bone marrow, muscle and normal cartilage in the different time frames. There was a significant but small difference between the MTR of normal cartilage and the cartilage repair area after 12 months for both procedures. After 24 months, the MTR of ACI repaired cartilage (0.31±0.07) was not significantly different from normal cartilage MTR (0.34±0.05). The MTR of MFR repaired cartilage (0.28±0.02), still showed a significant difference from normal cartilage.

Conclusion

The differences between damaged and repaired cartilage MTR are too small to enable MT-imaging to be a useful tool for postoperative follow-up of cartilage repair procedures. There is, however, an evolution towards normal MTR-values in the cartilage repair tissue (especially after ACI repair).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cooper C. Occupational activity and the risk of osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol 1995;43:10–12

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L. Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 1994;331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Briggs KK. Microfracture to treat full-thickness chondral defects: surgical technique, rehabilitation, and outcomes. J Knee Surg 2002;15:170–176

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Knutsen G, Engebretsen L, Ludvigsen TC et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture in the knee. A randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:455–464

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Disler DG, McCauley TR, Kelman CG et al. Fat-suppressed three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo MR imaging of hyaline cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with standard MR imaging and arthroscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:127–132

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bredella MA, Tirman PF, Peterfy CG et al. Accuracy of T2 weighted fast spin echo MR imaging with fat saturation in detecting cartilage defects in the knee: comparison with arthroscopy in 130 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:1073–1080

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Tins BJ, McCall IW, Takahashi T et al. Autologous chondrocyte implantation in knee joint: MR imaging and histologic features at 1-year follow-up. Radiology 2005;234:501–508

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morris GA, Freemont AJ. Direct observation of the magnetization exchange dynamics responsible for magnetization transfer contrast in human cartilage in vitro. Magn Reson Med 1992;28:97–104

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wachsmuth L, Juretschke HP, Raiss RX. Can magnetization transfer magnetic resonance imaging follow proteoglycan depletion in articular cartilage? MAGMA 1997;5:71–78

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ceckler TL, Wolff SD, Yip V, Simon SA, Balaban RS. Dynamic and chemical factors affecting water proton relaxation by macromolecules. J Magn Reson 1992;98:637–645

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim DK, Ceckler TL, Hascall VC, Calabro A, Balaban RS. Analysis of water-macromolecule proton magnetization transfer in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 1993;29:211–215

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gray ML, Burstein D, Lesperance LM, Gehrke L. Magnetization transfer in cartilage and its constituent macromolecules. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:319–325

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lattanzio PJ, Marshall KW, Damyanovich AZ, Peemoeller H. Macromolecule and water magnetization exchange modeling in articular cartilage. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:840–851

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wolff SD, Balaban RS. Magnetization transfer imaging: practical aspects and clinical applications. Radiology 1994;192:593–599

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S, Van Slyke MA, Smith MB. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 1997;205:546–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Frank LR, Wong EC, Luh WM, Ahn JM, Resnick D. Articular cartilage in the knee: mapping of the physiologic parameters at MR imaging with a local gradient coil-preliminary results. Radiology 1999;210:241–246

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mosher TJ, Dardzinski BJ, Smith MB. Human articular cartilage: influence of aging and early symptomatic degeneration on the spatial variation of T2-preliminary findings at 3 T. Radiology 2000;214:259–266

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Toyras J et al. T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:487–493

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goodwin DW, Zhu H, Dunn JF. In vitro MR imaging of hyaline cartilage: correlation with scanning electron microscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:405–409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Grunder W, Wagner M, Werner A. MR-microscopic visualization of anisotropic internal cartilage structures using the magic angle technique. Magn Reson Med 1998;39:376–382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Cova M, Toffanin R, Frezza F et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of articular cartilage: ex vivo study on normal cartilage correlated with magnetic resonance microscopy. Eur Radiol 1998;8:1130–1136

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Seo GS, Aoki J, Moriya H et al. Hyaline cartilage: in vivo and in vitro assessment with magnetization transfer imaging. Radiology 1996;201:525–530

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hohe J, Faber S, Stammberger T, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. A technique for 3D in vivo quantification of proton density and magnetization transfer coefficients of knee joint cartilage. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2000;8:426–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Henkelman RM. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. MR in Biomedicine 2001;14:57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, University ‘Federico II’, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy

    F. Palmieri

  2. Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Leuven, Belgium

    F. De Keyzer

  3. ESAT-PSI (Centre for the processing of speech and images), Department of Electrotechnics, Faculty of Engineering, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    F. Maes

  4. Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan 185, B-9000, Gent, Belgium

    I. Van Breuseghem

Authors
  1. F. Palmieri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. F. De Keyzer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. F. Maes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. I. Van Breuseghem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Van Breuseghem.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palmieri, F., De Keyzer, F., Maes, F. et al. Magnetization transfer analysis of cartilage repair tissue: a preliminary study. Skeletal Radiol 35, 903–908 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0146-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-006-0146-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation