Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Ultrasound body applications in children

  • ALARA-CT
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A major goal of imaging is to obtain the correct examination to answer the clinical questions with the lowest possible radiation exposure. While CT examination provides essential information in many cases, other modalities that do not entail ionizing radiation exposure may be appropriate substitutes either as an initial screening study or as an alternative to CT. US has become a valuable imaging tool in children encompassing many different clinical scenarios. This manuscript highlights some of the less well-accepted applications of US as the first imaging study in pediatric patients, especially in the emergency room environment. These include evaluation of suspected appendicitis, abdominal mass, pleural effusion/empyema, thymic abnormality vs. mediastinal mass and extremity soft-tissue mass or vessel patency. Adoption of US imaging as a problem-solving tool for issues such as these requires appropriate allocation of resources to ensure high-quality performance and interpretation of pediatric US studies around the clock.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Amis ES Jr, Butler PF, Applegate KE et al (2007) American College of Radiology white paper on radiation dose in medicine. J Am Coll Radiol 4:272–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography–an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hricak H (2010) Radiation exposure from medical imaging: time to regulate? JAMA 304:208–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. FDA (2010) Initiative to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure from medical imaging. In: Administration FaD (ed), pp 1–12

  5. Bogdanich W, Akam S (2009) Radiation overdoses point up dangers of CT scans. New York Times. The New York Times Company, New York, p A13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goske MJ, Applegate KE, Boylan J et al (2008) The ‘Image Gently’ campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program. Pediatr Radiol 38:265–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nievelstein RA, van Dam IM, van der Molen AJ (2010) Multidetector CT in children: current concepts and dose reduction strategies. Pediatr Radiol 40:1324–1344

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ et al (2006) US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology 241:83–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vissers RJ, Lennarz WB (2010) Pitfalls in appendicitis. Emerg Med Clin North Am 28:103–118, viii

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Garcia Pena BM, Mandl KD, Kraus SJ et al (1999) Ultrasonography and limited computed tomography in the diagnosis and management of appendicitis in children. JAMA 282:1041–1046

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Krishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE et al (2011) Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology 259:231–239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pedrosa I, Levine D, Eyvazzadeh AD et al (2006) MR imaging evaluation of acute appendicitis in pregnancy. Radiology 238:891–899

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Donnelly LF (2001) Neuroblastoma. Fundamentals of Pediatric Radiology. W. B. Saunders Company, Philadelphia, pp 163–165

    Google Scholar 

  14. Daneman A, Baunin C, Lobo E et al (1997) Disappearing suprarenal masses in fetuses and infants. Pediatr Radiol 27:675–681

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Petrus LV, Hall TR, Boechat MI et al (1992) The pediatric patient with suspected adrenal neoplasm: which radiological test to use? Med Pediatr Oncol 20:53–57

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Hryhorczuk AL, Strouse PJ (2009) Validation of US as a first-line diagnostic test for assessment of pediatric ileocolic intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 39:1075–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Pfluger T, Czekalla R, Hundt C et al (1999) MR angiography versus color Doppler sonography in the evaluation of renal vessels and the inferior vena cava in abdominal masses of pediatric patients. AJR 173:103–108

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ (1993) Color Doppler US of children with acute lower abdominal pain. Radiographics 13:1281–1293, discussion 1294

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ben-Ami TE, O’Donovan JC, Yousefzadeh DK (1993) Sonography of the chest in children. Radiol Clin North Am 31:517–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kim OH, Kim WS, Kim MJ et al (2000) US in the diagnosis of pediatric chest diseases. Radiographics 20:653–671

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kurian J, Levin TL, Han BK et al (2009) Comparison of ultrasound and CT in the evaluation of pneumonia complicated by parapneumonic effusion in children. AJR 193:1648–1654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Riccabona M (2008) Ultrasound of the chest in children (mediastinum excluded). Eur Radiol 18:390–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Gupta H, Araki Y, Davidoff AM et al (2007) Evaluation of pediatric oncology patients with previous multiple central catheters for vascular access: is Doppler ultrasound needed? Pediatr Blood Cancer 48:527–531

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Disclaimer

The supplement this article is part of is not sponsored by the industry. Dr. Newman has no financial interests, investigational or off-label uses to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beverley Newman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Newman, B. Ultrasound body applications in children. Pediatr Radiol 41 (Suppl 2), 555 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2107-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-011-2107-2

Keywords

Navigation