Abstract
Previous research indicates that people respond fastest when the motor response is (spatially, functionally, anatomically, or otherwise) congruent to the visual stimulus. This effect, called ideomotor compatibility, is thought to be expressed in motor areas. Congruence occurs when the stimulus and response share some dimensions in their internal representations. If the ideomotor compatibility hypothesis were true, we would expect facilitation when right hand stimuli are presented to the left hemisphere, or left hand stimuli are presented to the right hemisphere. To address this issue, we conducted a simple reaction time experiment with lateralized targets. Participants were instructed to press a button as soon as a target was observed. The target stimulus was a left hand, a right hand, or a neutral control. Each hemisphere showed faster responses to contralateral hand stimuli as compared with ipsilateral hand stimuli, consistent with the ideomotor compatibility hypothesis. The results support an automatic and implicit processing of visual stimuli within motor representations even when no recognition of, or decision about, the stimulus is necessary.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- LVF:
-
Left visual field
- RVF:
-
Right visual field
- VF:
-
Visual field
References
Allison JD, Meador KJ, Loring DW, Figueroa RE, Wright JC (2000) Functional MRI cerebral activation and deactivation during finger movement. Neurology 54:135–142
Brass M, Bekkering H, Prinz W (2001) Movement observation affects movement execution in a simple response task. Acta Psychol (Amst) 106:3–22
Craighero L, Bello A, Fadiga L, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures. Neuropsychologia 40:492–502
Desmurget M, Epstein CM, Turner RS, Prablanc C, Alexander GE, Grafton ST (1999) Role of the posterior parietal cortex in updating reaching movements to a visual target. Nat Neurosci 2:563–567
Downing PE, Jiang Y, Shuman M, Kanwisher N (2001) A cortical area selective for visual processing of the human body. Science 293:2470–2473
Gallese V, Fadiga L, Fogassi L, Rizzolatti G (1996) Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain 119:593–609
Greenwald AG (1970) Sensory feedback mechanism in performance control: with special reference to the ideomotor mechanism. Psychol Rev 77:73–99
Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (2000) Crossed–uncrossed difference in simple reaction times to lateralized flashes: between- and within-subjects variability. Neuropsychologia 38:535–541
Iacoboni M, Rayman J, Zaidel E (1997) Does the previous trial affect lateralized lexical decision? Neuropsychologia 35:81–88
Iacoboni M, Koski L, Brass M, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau M-C, Mazziotta JC, Rizzolatti G (2001) Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:13995–13999
James W (1890) The principles of psychology. MacMillan, New York
Kohler E, Keysers C, Umilta MA, Fogassi L, Gallese V, Rizzolatti G (2002) Hearing sounds, understanding actions: action representation in mirror neurons. Science 297:846–848
Koski L, Wohlschlager A, Bekkering H, Woods RP, Dubeau MC, Mazziotta JC, Iacoboni M (2002) Modulation of motor and premotor activity during imitation of target-directed actions. Cereb Cortex 12:847–855
Knuf L, Aschersleben G, Prinz W (2001) An analysis of ideomotor action. J Exp Psychol Gen 130:779–798
Oldfield RC (1971) The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia 9:97–113
Parsons LM, Fox PT (1998) The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cogn Neuropsychol 16:583–615
Prinz W (1997) Perception and action planning. Eur J Cogn Psychol 9:129–154
Vogt S, Taylor P, Hopkins B (2003) Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters. Neuropsychologia 41:941–951
Weekes NY, Capetillo-Cunliffe L, Rayman J, Iacoboni M, Zaidel E (1999) Individual differences in the hemispheric specialization of dual route variables. Brain Lang 67:110–133
Weems SA, Zaidel E (2005) Repetition priming within and between the two cerebral hemispheres. Brain Lang 93:298–307
Acknowledgments
We thank Ian Gizer and Eric Mooshagian for their assistance with this study. We also thank two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on this manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grant NS20187.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Iacoboni, M. & Zaidel, E. Hemispheric sensitivity to body stimuli in simple reaction time. Exp Brain Res 170, 116–121 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0194-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-005-0194-8