Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of oxidation and esterification on functional properties of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) starch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
European Food Research and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The chemical and physicochemical properties of mung bean starch oxidized by sodium hypochlorite and esterified with succinic anhydride were studied. Mung bean starch was modified by oxidation with sodium hypochlorite and esterified with succinic anhydride. The native mung bean starch (NMBS) granules were shown to have an irregular shape, which varied from oval to round to bean shape with a smooth surface. Succinylation led to partial rupture of the granule integrity while oxidation converted the smooth surface of the native granules to a surface with fissures. Swelling capacity improved through succinylation but was reduced after oxidation. Oxidation enhanced solubility; however, succinylation showed no uniform effect throughout the temperature range studied. Both modifications increased hydrophilic tendency and demonstrated decreased gelatinization temperature compared to the NMBS. Oil absorption capacity and syneresis of native starch was enhanced after oxidation but was reduced after succinylation. Both starch types, native and modified, exhibited non-Newtonian behavior, but to a different extent. The gel formation of oxidized starch revealed the highest storage modulus followed by native starch and then succinated starch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Walkowski A, Mączynski M, Lewandowicz G (2004) In: Tomasik P, Ruck H, Yuryev VP (eds) Starch: from starch containing sources to isolation of starches and their applications. Nova Science Publishers, New York, pp 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sangseethong K, Termvejsayanon N, Sriroth K (2010) Carbohydr Polym 82:446–453

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sadowska J, Wronkowska M, Lewandowicz G, Soral-Smietana M (2006) Pol J Food Nutr Sci 56:311–318

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chibuzo IM (2012) J Agric Food Technol 2:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  5. Choi SG, Kerr WL (2004) Starch/Stärke 56:181–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Betancur-Ancona DA, Chel-Guerrero LA, Camelo-Matos RI, Ortiz-Davila G (2001) Starch/Stäerke 53:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aykroyd WR, Doughty T (1977) Legumes in human nutrition. Italy: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (12), V-138. PubMed PMID: 309831

  8. Singh G, Wani AA, Kaur D, Sogi DS (2008) J Sci Food Agric 88:778–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shahen N, Roushdi M, Hassan RA (1978) Starch/Stäerke 30:148–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Su HS, Lu W, Chang KC (1997) J Food Sci Technol 31:265–273

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ratnayake WS, Hoover R, Shahidi F, Perera C, Jane J (2001) Food Chem 74:189–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim SH, Lee BH, Baik MY, Joo MH, Yoo SH (2007) J Food Sci 72:471–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Abdel-Rahman ESA, El-Fishawy AF, El-Geddawy AM, Kurz T, El-Rify NM (2008) Int J Food Eng 4: Article 1

  14. Hoover R, Ratnayake WS (2002) Food Chem 78:489–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lawal OS, Adebowale KO (2005) Carbohydr Polym 60:331–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Betancur-Ancona D, Garcia-Cervera E, Canizares-Hernandez E, Chel-Guerrero L (2002) Starch/Stäerke 54:540–546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Akintayo CO, Akintayo ET (2009) Adv Nat Appl Sci 3:196–203

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Adebowale KO, Afolabi TA, Olu-Owolabi BI (2006) Carbohydr Polym 65:93–101

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang JR (2006) Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands, pp 31–32

  20. US Department of Agriculture (2001) Nutrient database for stander reference. US Department of Agriculture, Washington, DC, p 14

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu W, Shen Q (2007) J Food Eng 79:1310–1314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mee-Rakweon, Seung-Yo A (1993) Korean J Food Sci Technol 25:264–269

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li S, Ward R, Gao Q (2011) Food Hydrocoll 25:1702–1709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chung KM, Moon TW, Kim H, Chun JK (2002) Cereal Chem 79:631–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hoover R, Hughes T, Chung HJ, Liu Q (2010) Food Res Int 43:399–413

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Forssel P, Hamunen A, Autio K, Suortti T, Poutanen K (1995) Starch/Stäerke 47:371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Trubiano PC (1986) In: Wurzburg OB (ed) Modified starches: properties and uses. CRC Press, Florida, pp 131–148

    Google Scholar 

  28. Parovuori P, Hamunen A, Forssel P, Autio K, Poutanen K (1995) Oxidation of potato starch by hydrogen peroxide. Starch/Stäerke 47:19–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Genung LB, Mallat RC (1941) Ind Eng Chem 13:369–374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. McGrance S, Cornell H, Rix C (1998) Starch/Stäerke 50:158–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Waliszewki KN, Maria AA, Luis AB, Jose AM (2003) Carbohydr Polym 52:237–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Beuchat LR (1977) J Agric Food Chem 25:258–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. SPSS (2008) Statistics for Windows, Version 17.0. Chicago: SPSS Inc

  34. Hoover R, Li YX, Hynes G, Senanayake N (1997) Food Hydrocoll 11:401–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Lawal OS (2004) Carbohydr Res 339:2673–2682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kuakpetoon D, Wang YJ (2006) Carbohydr Res 341:1896–1915

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Kuakpetoon D, Wang YJ (2008) Carbohydr Res 343:90–100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kuakpetoon D, Wang YJ (2001) Starch/Stäerke 53:211–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Gonzalez-Soto RA, Mora-Escobedo R, Hernandez-Sanchez H, Sanchez-Rivera MY, Bello-Perez LA (2007) J Sci Food Agric 87:348–356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rutenberg MW, Solarek D (1984) In: Whistler RL, BeMiller JN, Paschall EF (eds) Starch: Chemistry and technology. Academic Press, New York, pp 311–388

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Vanier NL, Zavareze EDR, Pinto VZ, Klein B, Botelho FT (2012) Food Chem 131:1255–1262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Adebowale KO, Lawal OS (2003) J Sci Food Agric 83:1541–1546

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Shieldneck P, Smith CE (1971) In: Whistler RL, Paschall EF (eds) Starch: chemistry and technology. Academic Press, New York, pp 173–215

    Google Scholar 

  44. Olayinka OO, Olu-Owolabi IB, Adebowale KO (2011) Food Hydrocoll 25:515–520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Sathe SK, Salunkhe DK (1981) J Food Sci 46:617–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Yusuf AA, Ayedun H, Logunleko AGO (2007) ASSET Series B 6:143–150

    Google Scholar 

  47. Lawal OS (2004) Food Chem 87:205–218

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bhandari PN, Singhal RS (2002) Carbohydr Polym 48:233–240

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Takeiti C, Fakhouri F, Ormenese R, Steel C, Collares F (2007) Starch/Stärke 59:156–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Sudhakar V, Singhal RS, Kulkarni PR (1992) Starch/Stäerke 44:369–374

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Weber HF (2005) PhD Thesis, State University of Campinas, Brazil, p 135

  52. Guerra-Della VD, Sanchez-Rivera MM, Zamudio-Flores PB, Mendez-Montealvo G, Bello-perez LA (2009) Rev Mex Ing Chim 8:197–203

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The first author is grateful to Professor Pan Si Yi, the head of the collage of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China, for offering the financial support and required facilities to conduct this research. Thanks were also due to Dr. Xu Xiao Yun for her support and suggestion. Acknowledgements with gratitude are due to all members of food analysis laboratory in Huazhong Agricultural University-Wuhan-Hubei, China, for their enthusiastic help during the period of the study.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China

    Maisa Bushra, Xu Xiao Yun, Si Yi Pan, Miao Wen hua & Wang Lu Feng

  2. Department of Food Science, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Science, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada

    Arine Hydamaka

Authors
  1. Maisa Bushra
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xu Xiao Yun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Si Yi Pan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Arine Hydamaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Miao Wen hua
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Wang Lu Feng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Si Yi Pan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bushra, M., Yun, X.X., Pan, S.Y. et al. Effect of oxidation and esterification on functional properties of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) starch. Eur Food Res Technol 236, 119–128 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1857-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-012-1857-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation