Abstract
The set of Nash equilibria of a finite game is the set of nonnegative solutions to a system of polynomial equations. In this survey article, we describe how to construct certain special games and explain how to find all the complex roots of the corresponding polynomial systems, including all the Nash equilibria. We then explain how to find all the complex roots of the polynomial systems for arbitrary generic games, by polyhedral homotopy continuation starting from the solutions to the specially constructed games. We describe the use of Gröbner bases to solve these polynomial systems and to learn geometric information about how the solution set varies with the payoff functions. Finally, we review the use of the Gambit software package to find all Nash equilibria of a finite game.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basu S., Pollack R., Roy M.-F.: Algorithms in Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Bernstein D.N.: The number of roots of a system of equations. Funct Anal Appl 9, 183–185 (1975)
Bochnak J., Coste M., Roy M.-F.: Real Algebraic Geometry. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Cox D., Little J., O’Shea D.: Ideals, Varieties, and Algorithms. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)
Cox D., Little J., O’Shea D.: Using Algebraic Geometry. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)
Datta, R.S.: Algebraic Methods In Game Theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley (2003a)
Datta R.S.: Universality of Nash equilibria. Math Oper Res 28, 424–432 (2003b)
Datta, R.S.: Using computer algebra to find Nash equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Symposium on Symbolic and Algebraic Computation, pp. 74–79 (electronic). ACM, New York (2003c)
Dickenstein A., Emiris I.Z. (2005) Solving Polynomial Equations. Springer, Heidelberg
Gelfand I.M., Kapranov M.M., Zelevinsky A.V.: Discriminants, Resultants and Multidimensional Determinants. Birkhäuser, Basel (1994)
Greuel, G.-M., Pfister, G., Schönemann, H.: Singular 2.0. A computer algebra system for polynomial computations. Centre for Computer Algebra, University of Kaiserslautern. http://www.singular.uni-kl.de (2001)
Harsanyi J.: Oddness of the number of equilibrium points: a new proof. Int J Game Theory 2, 235–250 (1973)
Herings P.J.-J., Peeters R.: A globally convergent algorithm to compute all Nash equilibria for n-person games. Ann Oper Res 137, 349–368 (2005)
Herings, P.J.-J., Peeters, R.: Homotopy methods to compute equilibria in game theory. Econ Theory (2009) (this issue)
Huber B., Sturmfels B.: A polyhedral method for solving sparse polynomial systems. Math Comput 64, 1541–1555 (1995)
Kouchnirenko A.G.: Newton polytopes and the Bezout theorem. Funct Anal Appl 10, 233–235 (1976)
Lazard D., Rouillier F.: Solving parametric polynomial systems. J Symb Comput 42, 636–667 (2007)
McKelvey R., McLennan A.: The maximal number of regular totally mixed Nash equilibria. J Econ Theory 72, 411–425 (1997)
McKelvey, R.D., McLennan, A.M., Turocy, T.L.: Gambit: Software tools for game theory, version 0.2006.01.20 (2006). Available at http://econweb.tamu.edu/gambit/
McLennan A.M.: The expected number of real roots of a multihomogeneous system of polynomial equations. Am J Math 124, 49–73 (2002)
Montes A.: A new algorithm for discussing Groebner bases with parameters. J Symb Comput 33, 183–208 (2002)
Osborne M.J., Rubinstein A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge (1994)
Porter R., Nudelman E., Shoham Y.: Simple search methods for finding a Nash equilibrium. Games Econ Behav 63, 642–662 (2008)
Sommese A.J., Wampler C.W.: The Numerical Solution of Systems of Polynomials Arising in Engineering and Science. World Scientific, Singapore (2005)
Sturmfels B.: Solving Systems of Polynomial Equations. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2002)
Torregrosa J.R., Jordán C., el Ghamry R.: The nonsingular matrix completion problem. Int J Contemp Math Sci 2, 349–355 (2007)
Verschelde J.: Algorithm 795: PHCpack: a general-purpose solver for polynomial systems by homotopy continuation. ACM Trans Math Softw 25, 251–276 (1999)
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Our earlier paper (Datta 2003c) contains much of the material which is surveyed more expansively here. We would like to express our gratitude to the following for generously taking the time to personally discuss with us the use of their software packages: Andrew McLennan and Ted Turocy (Gambit McKelvey et al. 2006), Gert-Martin Greuel (Singular Greuel et al. 2001), and Jan Verschelde (PHC Verschelde 1999). We would also like to thank Gabriela Jeronimo for sending us a preprint of her paper with Daniel Perrucci and Juan Sabia, and Andrew McLennan for suggesting she do so. We would like to thank Richard Fateman and Bernd Sturmfels for supervising the research leading up to that paper, during which the author was partially supported by NSF grant DMS 0138323. We would also like to acknowledge our debt to Bernd Sturmfels, especially for teaching us about the application of polynomial algebra to Nash equilibria, in the lectures leading to Sturmfels (2002).
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Datta, R.S. Finding all Nash equilibria of a finite game using polynomial algebra. Econ Theory 42, 55–96 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0447-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-009-0447-z