Skip to main content
Log in

A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quality function deployment (QFD) provides a systematic methodology to assist companies in developing quality products that are able to satisfy customer needs. The house of quality (HOQ), as the first phase of QFD, plays the most important role in product development. Frequently, fuzzy numbers are used to quantify the vagueness of linguistic terms so as to facilitate subjective assessments in the HOQ. However, the issue concerning how to determine the boundary intervals of fuzzy numbers remains unresolved. This work proposes a novel approach based on rough set theory, and introduces two concepts called rough number and rough boundary interval to address this issue. A comparative case study presented in this work shows that the proposed approach has significant advantages compared to the prevailing fuzzy number based method in processing subjective linguistic assessments in QFD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cohen L (1995) Quality function deployment: how to make QFD work for you. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Karsak E (2004) Fuzzy multiple objective decision making approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Int J Prod Res 42/18:3957–3974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Moskowitz H, Kim K-J (1997) QFD optimizer: a novice friendly quality function deployment support decision-support system for optimizing product designs. Com and Ind Eng 32:641–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Khoo L-P, Ho N-C (1996) Framework of a fuzzy quality function deployment system. Int J Prod Res 34/2:299–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chan L-K, Wu M-L (2005) A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example. Omega 33:119–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan L-K, Wu M-L (1998) Prioritizing the technical measures in quality function deployment. Qual Eng 10:467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hauser J, Clausing D (1988) The house of quality. Harv Bus Rev 66:63–73

    Google Scholar 

  8. Akao Y (1990) Quality function deployment: integrating customer requirements into product design. Maple-Vail, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  9. Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mkt Sci 12(1):1–27

    Google Scholar 

  10. ReVelle JB, Moran JW, Cox CA (1998) The QFD handbook. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Temponi C, Yen J, Tiao W-A (1999) House of quality: a fuzzy logic-based requirements analysis. Eur J Oper Res 117:340–354

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen L-H, Weng M-C (2003) A fuzzy model for exploiting quality function deployment. Math Com Mod 38:559–570

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan L-K, Kao H-P, Ng A, Wu M-L (1999) Rating the importance of customer needs in quality function deployment by fuzzy and entropy methods. Int J Prod Res 37/11:2499–2518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou M (1998) Fuzzy logic and optimization models for implementing QFD. Com Ind Eng 35:237–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang J (1999) Fuzzy outranking approach to prioritize design requirements in quality function deployment. Int J Prod Res 37/4:899–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shen X-X, Tan K-C, Xie M (2001) The implementation of quality function deployment based on linguistic data. J Intell Manuf 12:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vanegas L, Labib A (2001) A fuzzy quality function deployment (FQFD) model for deriving optimum targets. Int J Prod Res 39/l:99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Roder A, Tibken B (2006) A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. Eur J Oper Res 169(3):1010–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim K, Kim D, Min D (2007) Robust QFD: framework and a case study. Quali and Reli Eng Int 23(1):31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pawlak Z (1982) Rough sets. Int J Com Info Sci 11/5:341–356

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Pawlak Z (1991) Rough sets-theoretical aspects of reasoning about data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Khoo L-P, Tor S-B, Zhai L-Y (1999) A rough-set based approach for classification and rule induction. Int J Adv Manuf Tech 15:438–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Greco S, Matarazzo B, Slowinski R (2001) Rough sets theory for multicriteria decision analysis. Eur J Oper Res 129:1–47

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Alefeld G, Herzberger J (1983) Introduction to interval computations. Academic Press, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moore RE (1979) Methods and applications of interval analysis. SIAM, Philadelphia

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Kearfott RB, Kreinovich V (1996) Applications of interval computations. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lian-Yin Zhai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhai, LY., Khoo, LP. & Zhong, ZW. A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37, 613–624 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0989-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-007-0989-9

Keywords

Navigation