Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Do agglomerations stimulate productivity? An extensive literature on agglomeration economies, or urban increasing returns, has analyzed this question with aggregated spatial data. This paper estimates the relationship between agglomeration and productivity at the firm level using static and dynamic models. It makes use of a rich dataset comprising register information on all manufacturing firms in Sweden with 10 or more employees over the period 1997–2004. Three things emerge. First, firms located in larger regions are more productive when controlling for size, human capital, physical capital, ownership structure, import and export, industry classification, and time trend. Second, results from dynamic panel estimations suggests a learning effect in that agglomeration enhances firms’ productivity. Third, the role of agglomeration phenomena does not seem to have a clear coupling to firm size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Åberg Y (1973) Regional productivity differences in Swedish manufacturing. Reg Sci Urban Econ 3: 131–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almeida P, Kogut B (1999) Localization of knowledge and the mobility of engineers in regional networks. Manag Sci 45: 905–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T, Hsiao C (1982) Formulation and estimation of dynamic models using panel data. J Econom 18: 67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Karlsson C (2007) Knowledge in regional economic growth—the role of knowledge accessibility. Ind Innov 14: 129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson M, Johansson B (2008) Innovation ideas and regional characteristics—innovations and export entrepreneurship by firms in Swedish regions. Growth Change 39: 193–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some test of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58: 277–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arelleno M, Bover O (1995) Another Look at instrumental variable estimation of error component models. J Econom 68: 29–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch D, Feldman M (1996) R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. Am Econ Rev 86: 630–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin R, Okubo T (2006) Heterogeneous firms, agglomeration and economic geography: spatial selection and sorting. J Econ Geogr 6: 323–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balestra P, Nerlove M (1966) Pooling cross section and times series data in the estimation of a dynamic model: the demand for natural gas. Econometrica 24: 585–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltagi BH (2008) Econometric analysis of panel data, 4th edn. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Baptista R (2000) Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters?. Int J Ind Organ 18: 515–535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17: 99–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartel AP, Lichtenberg FR (1987) The comparative advantage of educated workers in implementing new technology. Rev Econ Stat 69: 1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard AB and Jensen JB (1995) Exporters, jobs and wages in US manufacturing 1976–1987. Brookings Paper on Economic Activity, pp 67–119

  • Blundell RS, Bond S (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. J Econ 87: 115–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bond S (2002) Dynamic panel data models: a guide to micro data methods and practice, CWP 09/02

  • Bond S, Hoffler A, Temple J (2001) GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Economics Papers 2001-W21, University of Oxford

  • Braunerhjelm P, Borgman B (2004) Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–1999. Region Stud 38: 929–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart M, Mathys N (2008) Sectoral agglomeration economies in a panel of European regions. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38: 348–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brülhart M, Sbergarmi F (2009) Agglomeration and growth—cross-country evidence. J Urban Econ 65: 48–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone (2002) Agglomeration effects in Europe. Eur Econ Rev 46: 213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciccone A, Hall RE (1996) Productivity and the density of economic activity. Am Econ Rev 86: 54–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm Sci Q 35: 128–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dachs B, Ebersberger B, Lööf H (2008) The innovative performance of foreign-owned enterprises in small open economies. J Technol Transf 33: 393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Puga D (2000) Diversity and specialization in cities: why, where and when does it matter?. Urban Stud 37: 533–555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duranton G, Puga D (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2063–2117

    Google Scholar 

  • Ejerno O, Gråsjö U (2008) The effects of R&D on regional invention and innovation, CIRCLE WP Series, 2008-03

  • Fallick B, Fleischmann CA, Rebitzer JB (2006) Job hopping in Silicon Valley: some evidence concerning the micro-foundations of a high technology cluster. Rev Econ Stat 88: 472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenken K, Van Oort FG, Verburg T (2007) Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Region Stud 41: 685–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse JF (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cities, industrial location, and regional growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Venables A (1999) The Spatial Economy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski P, Machin S, Van Reenen J (1993) The profitability of innovating firms. Rand J Econ 24: 198–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser E, Maré D (2001) Cities and skills. J Labor Econ 19: 316–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenaway D, Kneller R (2007) Firm heterogeneity, exporting and foreign direct investment. Econ J 117: 134–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches Z, Mairesse J (1984) Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In: Griliches Z (ed) R&D Patents and Productivity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 339–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA, Taylor WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica 49: 1377–1398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson VJ (2003) Marshall’s scale economies. J Urban Econ 53: 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesley R, Strange W (1990) Matching and agglomeration economies in a system of cities. Reg Sci Urban Econ 20: 189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz-Eakin D, Newey W, Rosen HS (1988) Estimating vector autoregressions with panel data. Econometrica 56: 1371–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoover E (1937) Location theory and the shoe and leather industries. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao C (2002) Analysis of panel data. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe AB, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 108: 577–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson B, Lööf H (2008) Innovation activities explained by firm attributes and location. Econ Innov New Technol 17: 533–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlsson C, Pettersson L (2005) Regional productivity and accessibility to knowledge and dense markets, CESIS WP 32

  • Kim S (1990) Labor heterogeneity, wage bargaining and agglomeration economies. J Urban Econ 28: 160–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klaesson J, Johansson B (2008) Agglomeration dynamics of business services, CESIS WP 153

  • Klaesson J, Larsson H (2008) Wages, productivity and industry composition—agglomeration economies in Swedish regions. Mimeograph Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22: 3–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics. MacMillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen J (2005) Is mobility of technical personnel a source of R&D spillovers?. J Labor Econ 23: 81–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw RL (1981) Productive efficiency and the region. South Econ J 48: 344–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moomaw RL (1983) Is population scale a worthless surrogate for business agglomeration economies?. Reg Sci Urban Econ 13: 525–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moretti E (2004) Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: evidence from plant-level production functions. Am Econ Rev 94: 656–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamura R (1985) Agglomeration Economies in Urban manufacturing industries: a case of Japanese cities. J Urban Econ 17: 108–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nerlove M (1999) Likelihood of inference for dynamic panel models. L’Annales d’economie et de statistique 55: 1–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickell SJ (1981) Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica 49: 1417–1426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin B (1933) Interregional and international trade. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose ET (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfaffermayr M, Bellak C (2002) Why foreign-owned firms are different: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence for Austria. In: Jungnickel R (eds) Foreign-owned firms: are they different?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 13–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Phaffermayr M, Bellak C (2002) Why foreign-owned firms are different: a conceptual framework and empirical evidence for Austria. In: Jungnickel R (ed) Foreign-owned firms: are they different?. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, pp 13–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Plümper T, Troeger V (2007) Efficient estimation of time-invariant and rarely changing variables in finite sample panel analyses with unit fixed effects. Polit Anal 15: 124–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quigley JM (1998) Urban diversity and economic growth. J Econ Perspect 12(2): 127–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauch JE (1993) Productivity gains from geographic concentration of human capital: evidence from the cities. J Urban Econ 34: 380–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice P, Venables AJ, Patacchini E (2006) Spatial determinants of productivity: analysis for the regions of Great Britain. Reg Sci Urban Econ 36: 727–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer PM (1990) Endogenous technological change. J Polit Econ 98: 71–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman D (2006) How to Do xtabond: An Introduction to “Difference” and “System” GMM an Stata. CGDEV Working Paper 103

  • Rosenthal S, Strange W (2004) Evidence on the nature and sources of agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of regional and urban economics. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 2118–2147

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal D (1976) Are there returns to scale in city size?. Rev Econ Stat 58: 339–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shefer D (1973) Localization economies in SMSAs: a production function approach. J Reg Sci 13: 55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sveikauskas L (1975) The productivity of cities. Q J Econ 89: 393–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varga A (1997) University research and regional innovation: a spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J (2007) Exports and Productivity—a survey of the evidence from firm level data. World Econ 30: 60–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler CH (2006) Cities and the growth of wages among young workers: evidence from the NLSY. J Urban Econ 60: 162–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer F (2000) Efficiency Comparisons for a system GMM estimator in dynamic panel data models. In: Heijmans RDH, Pollock SSG, Satorra A (eds) Innovations in multivariate statistical analysis a festschrift for heinz neudecker. Kluwer, Boston, pp 175–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Windmeijer F (2005) A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. J Econom 126: 25–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yankow JJ (2006) Why do Cities Pay More? an empirical examination of some competing theories of the urban wage premium. J Urban Econ 60: 139–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS), Jönköping International Business School (JIBS), Jönköping, Sweden

    Martin Andersson

  2. Division of Economics, Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies (CESIS), Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden

    Martin Andersson & Hans Lööf

Authors
  1. Martin Andersson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hans Lööf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Andersson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Andersson, M., Lööf, H. Agglomeration and productivity: evidence from firm-level data. Ann Reg Sci 46, 601–620 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0352-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0352-1

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation