Skip to main content
Log in

Urban spatial pattern as self-organizing system: An empirical evaluation of firm location decisions in Cleveland–Akron PMSA, Ohio

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic models of urban spatial patterns have largely ignored complexity as an attribute of urban systems. Complexity theorists on the other hand have not made sufficiently serious and sustained attempts to verify empirically the relevance of complex systems models for urban spatial patterns. This research bridges this gap by simulating the evolution of an urban employment pattern as a self-organizing complex system and seeking its empirical validation. It estimates the model’s parameters by using firm data aggregated to the level of municipalities in Cleveland-Akron Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area in Ohio. The interaction among four parameters, forces of attraction and dispersion and their respective rates of dissipation with distance, are modeled as a two-dimensional complex system. The research compares the states of the modeled system with empirical data to present viable methods for verification, calibration and validation of such models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen MP (1997) Cities and regions as self-organizing systems: Models of complexity. Gordon and Breach, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MP (2001) What is the science of complexity? Emergence 3:24–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Anas A, Arnott R, Small KA (1998) Urban spatial structure. J Econ Literat 36:1426–1464

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Hahn F (1971) General competitive analysis. Holden-Day, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthur WB (1988) Self-reinforcing mechanisms in economics. In: Philip WA, Kenneth JA, David Pines (eds) The economy as an evolving complex system. Addison-Wesley, Reading MA, pp 9–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry BJL, Schwind PJ (1969) Information and entropy in migrant flows. Geograph Anal 1:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown D, Heal G (1979) Equity, efficiency and increasing returns. Rev Econ Stud 46:571–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cadwallader M (1996) Urban geography: An analytical approach. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Christaller W (1933) Die Zentralen Orte in Seddeutschland. Translated by C. W. Baskin to Central places in southern Germany. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. 1966

  • Fujita M, Krugman P, Mori T (1999) On the evolution of hierarchical urban systems. Eur Econ Rev 43:209–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse JF (1986) Spatial competition with a land market: hotelling and Von Thunen unified. Rev Econ Stud 53:819–841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse JF (2002) Economics of agglomeration. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrison CB, Paulson AS (1973) An entropy measure of the geographic concentration of economic activity. Econ Geograph 49:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgescu-Rogen N (1971) The entropy law and economic process. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris C, Ullman EL (1945) The nature of cities. Ann Ame Acad Polit Soc Sci 242:7–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E, Krugman P (1985) Market structure and foreign trade: Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the international economy. MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirshman OA (1958) The strategy of economic development. Yale University Press, New Haven CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotelling H (1929) Stability in competition. Econ J 39:41–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huriot JM, Thisse JF (ed) (2000) Economics of cities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman AS (1993) The origins of order. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilkenny M, Thisse JF (1999) Economics of location: a selective survey. Comput Oper Res 26:1369–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1981) Trade, accumulation and uneven development. J Develop Econ 8:149–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1991) Increasing returns and economic geography. J Polit Econ 99:483–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1996) The self-organizing economy. Blackwell, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman P (1998) What’s new about the new economic geography? Oxford Rev Econ Policy 14:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lösch A (1940) The economics of location (Fischer Jena: English translation). Yale University Press, New Haven, CT (1954)

  • Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th ed. McMillan, London (1st ed. [1891] McMillan, London)

  • Medvedkov YV (1967) The concept of entropy in settlement pattern analysis. Pap Reg Sci Assoc 18:165–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses NL (1958) Location and the theory of production. Quart J Econ 72:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal G (1957) Economic theory and under-developed regions. Duckworth, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Portugali J (2000) Self-organization and the city. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Semple RK, Golledge RG (1970) An analysis of entropy changes in a settlement pattern over time. Econ Geograph 46:157–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shannon CE, Weaver W (1949) The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois Press, Urbana IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout C (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64:416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Thünen JH (1826) Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung auf Landshaft und Nationalökonomie, (translation by C. M. Wartednberg to von Thünen’s Isolated State, 1966). Pergamon Press, Oxford

  • Weber A (1909) Uber den standort der Industrien (translation: The theory of the location of industries, 1929). Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Weidlich W, Haag G (1987) A dynamic phase transition model for spatial agglomeration processes. J Reg Sci 27:529–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White R, Engelen G (2000) High-resolution integrated modelling of the spatial dynamics of urban and regional systems. Comput Environ Urban Syst 24:383–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mukesh Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, M., Bowen, W.M. & Kaufman, M. Urban spatial pattern as self-organizing system: An empirical evaluation of firm location decisions in Cleveland–Akron PMSA, Ohio. Ann Reg Sci 41, 297–314 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0097-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-006-0097-z

JEL Classification

Navigation