Zusammenfassung
Beim Mammakarzinom handelt es sich um den häufigsten gynäkologischen Tumor, dessen Behandlung sich multimodal und interdisziplinär zusammensetzt. Dabei wird in Deutschland unter anderem das neoadjuvante Chemotherapiekonzept angewandt. Eine weit verbreitete Zunahme erfährt die Wirkstoffgruppe der Taxane, die auch in adjuvanten und neoadjuvanten Situationen eingesetzt wird. Der Einsatz zielgerichteter Therapie erfolgt nach den zwei prädiktiven Markern (Hormonrezeptor und Her2neu-Status). Bezüglich der endokrinen Therapie hormonrezeptorpositiver Karzinome erfolgt in der Prämenopause die fünfjährige Gabe von Tamoxifen, in der Postmenopause der Einsatz von Aromataseinhibitoren. Zur Abschätzung der Prädiktion und des Risikos eines Rezidivs etablieren sich immer mehr Tests, die das Genexpressionsprofil des Tumors berücksichtigen, für die jedoch noch keine prospektiven Daten vorliegen. Die Individualisierung der Brustkrebstherapie nimmt vor diesem Hintergrund neue Gestalt an und lässt auf eine individualisierte Therapie mit Erfolgsaussicht und möglichst niedrigen Nebenwirkungsraten hoffen.
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common gynecological cancer, accounting for almost 70,000 newly diagnosed cases each year. Patients are treated using a multimodal and interdisciplinary effort. Especially the neoadjuvant treatment concept is widely used in Germany. Taxanes are increasingly being routinely used in neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy schedules. Targeted therapy is based on the two accepted predictive markers (hormone receptor status and the expression of Her2-neu receptors). In premenopausal women, 5 years of tamoxifen remains the standard; aromatase inhibitors should be included in postmenopausal patients. Newly developed tests to predict the risk of recurrence or the benefit from conventional chemotherapies are based on gene expression profiles. The validation of these tests is currently based on retrospective data. However, future developments will provide new possibilities for individualized therapy in breast cancer patients.
Literatur
Baselga J, Bradbury I, Eidtmann H et al (2012) Lapatinib with trastuzumab for HER2-positive early breast cancer (NeoALTTO): a randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 3 trial. Lancet 379:633–640
Berry DA, Cronin KA, Plevritis SK et al (2005) Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1784–1792
Davies C, Godwin J, Gray R et al (2011) Relevance of breast cancer hormone receptors and other factors to the efficacy of adjuvant tamoxifen: patient-level meta-analysis of randomised trials. Lancet 378:771–784
Denkert C, Kronenwett R, Schlake W et al (2012) Decentral gene expression analysis for ER +/Her2- breast cancer: results of a proficiency testing program for the EndoPredict assay. Virchows Arch 460:251–259
Dowsett M, Cuzick J, Ingle J et al (2010) Meta-analysis of breast cancer outcomes in adjuvant trials of aromatase inhibitors versus tamoxifen. J Clin Oncol 28:509–518
Filipits M, Rudas M, Jakesz R et al (2011) A new molecular predictor of distant recurrence in ER-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer adds independent information to conventional clinical risk factors. Clin Cancer Res 17:6012–6020
Fisher B, Bryant J, Wolmark N et al (1998) Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the outcome of women with operable breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 16:2672–2685
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS et al (2011) Strategies for subtypes – dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 22:1736–1747
Goss PE, Ingle JN, Martino S et al (2005) Randomized trial of letrozole following tamoxifen as extended adjuvant therapy in receptor-positive breast cancer: updated findings from NCIC CTG MA.17. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1262–1271
Hadji P (2010) Improving compliance and persistence to adjuvant tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitor therapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 73:156–166
Janicke F, Prechtl A, Thomssen C et al (2001) Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:913–920
Martin M, Pienkowski T, Mackey J et al (2005) Adjuvant docetaxel for node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 352:2302–2313
Moebus V, Jackisch C, Lueck HJ et al (2010) Intense dose-dense sequential chemotherapy with epirubicin, paclitaxel, and cyclophosphamide compared with conventionally scheduled chemotherapy in high-risk primary breast cancer: mature results of an AGO phase III study. J Clin Oncol 28:2874–2880
Paik S, Shak S, Tang G et al (2004) A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 351:2817–2826
Paik S, Tang G, Shak S et al (2006) Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 24:3726–3734
Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB et al (2000) Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 406:747–752
Peto R, Davies C, Godwin J et al (2012) Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100,000 women in 123 randomised trials. Lancet 379:432–444
Romond EH, Perez EA, Bryant J et al (2005) Trastuzumab plus adjuvant chemotherapy for operable HER2-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 353:1673–1684
Simon RM, Paik S, Hayes DF (2009) Use of archived specimens in evaluation of prognostic and predictive biomarkers. J Natl Cancer Inst 101:1446–1452
Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R et al (2001) Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:10869–10874
Sparano JA, Wang M, Martino S et al (2008) Weekly paclitaxel in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 358:1663–1671
Untch M, Loibl S, Bischoff J et al (2012) Lapatinib versus trastuzumab in combination with neoadjuvant anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy (GeparQuinto, GBG 44): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:135–144
Untch M, Rezai M, Loibl S et al (2010) Neoadjuvant treatment with trastuzumab in HER2-positive breast cancer: results from the GeparQuattro study. J Clin Oncol 28:2024–2031
Van De Velde CJ, Rea D, Seynaeve C et al (2011) Adjuvant tamoxifen and exemestane in early breast cancer (TEAM): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet 377:321–331
Von Minckwitz G, Eidtmann H, Loibl S et al (2011) Integrating bevacizumab, everolimus, and lapatinib into current neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for primary breast cancer. Safety results of the GeparQuinto trial. Ann Oncol 22:301–306
Interessenkonflikt
Dr. med. Dirk O. Bauerschlag gibt an, Beraterhonorar von GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) erhalten zu haben. PD Dr. Marcus Schmidt weist auf folgende Beziehungen hin: Er war als Referent für Sanofi Aventis, Roche, Pfizer, Genomic Health und Sividon tätig und hat von diesen Firmen auch Beraterhonorar erhalten.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bauerschlag, D., Schmidt, M. Mammakarzinom. Gynäkologe 45, 623–632 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-012-3007-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00129-012-3007-8