Skip to main content
Log in

Cross-species correlation between queen mating numbers and worker ovary sizes suggests kin conflict may influence ovary size evolution in honeybees

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During social evolution, the ovary size of reproductively specialized honey bee queens has dramatically increased while their workers have evolved much smaller ovaries. However, worker division of labor and reproductive competition under queenless conditions are influenced by worker ovary size. Little comparative information on ovary size exists in the different honey bee species. Here, we report ovariole numbers of freshly dissected workers from six Apis species from two locations in Southeast Asia. The average number of worker ovarioles differs significantly among species. It is strongly correlated with the average mating number of queens, irrespective of body size. Apis dorsata, in particular, is characterized by numerous matings and very large worker ovaries. The relation between queen mating number and ovary size across the six species suggests that individual selection via reproductive competition plays a role in worker ovary size evolution. This indicates that genetic diversity, generated by multiple mating, may bear a fitness cost at the colony level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

References

  • Amdam GV, Omholt SW (2002) The regulatory anatomy of honeybee lifespan. J Theor Biol 21:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amdam GV, Csondes A, Fondrk MK, Page RE Jr (2006) Complex social behaviour derived from maternal reproductive traits. Nature 439:76–78

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blomberg SP, Garland T, Ives AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717–745

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bourke AFG (1999) Colony size, social complexity and reproductive conflict in social insects. J Evol Biol 12:245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaud-Netto J, Bueno OC (1979) Number of ovarioles in workers of Apis mellifera adansonii and Apis mellifera ligustica: a comparative study. J Apicult Res 18:260–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly HV, Balling SS (1978) Identification of Africanized honeybees in the Western hemisphere by discriminant analysis. J Kans Entomol Soc 51:857–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham AM, Munday MD, Kaftanoglu O, Page RE Jr, Amdam GV, Rueppell O (2011) Support for the reproductive ground plan hypothesis of social evolution and major QTL for ovary traits of Africanized worker honey bees (Apis mellifera L.). BMC Evol Biol 11:95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn HR, Radloff SE, Otis GW, Fuchs S, Verma LR, Ken T et al (2005) Apis florea: morphometrics, classification and biogeography. Apidologie 36:359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs JS, McHale M, Oldroyd BP (2010) A scientific note on a rapid method for the molecular discrimination of Apis andreniformis and A. florea. Apidologie 41:96–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Itioka T, Inoue T, Kaliang H, Kato M, Nagamitsu T, Momose K et al (2001) Six-year population fluctuation of the giant honey bee Apis dorsata (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in a tropical lowland dipterocarp forest in Sarawak. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khila A, Abouheif E (2008) Reproductive constraint is a developmental mechanism that maintains social harmony in advanced ant societies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:17884–17889

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linksvayer TA, Rueppell O, Siegel A, Kaftanoglu O, Page RE Jr, Amdam GV (2009) The genetic basis of transgressive ovary size in honey bee workers. Genetics 183:693–707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Makert GR, Paxton RJ, Hartfelder K (2006) Ovariole number—a predictor of differential reproductive success among worker subfamilies in queenless honeybee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:815–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins JR, Nunes FMF, Simoes ZLP, Bitondi MMG (2008) A honeybee storage protein gene, hex 70a, expressed in developing gonads and nutritionally regulated in adult fat body. J Insect Physiol 54:867–877

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S (2006) Asian honey bees: biology, conservation and human interactions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldroyd BP, Halling LA, Good G, Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Barron AB, Nanork P et al (2001) Worker policing and worker reproduction in Apis cerana. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50:371–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oster GF, Wilson EO (1978) Caste and ecology in the social insects. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Page RE Jr, Amdam GV (2007) The making of a social insect: developmental architectures of social design. Bioessays 29:334–343

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Phiancharoen M, Pirk CWW, Radloff SE, Hepburn R (2010) Clinal nature of the frequencies of ovarioles and spermathecae in Cape worker honeybees, Apis mellifera capensis. Apidologie 41:129–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueppell O, Hunggims E, Tingek S (2008) Association between larger ovaries and pollen foraging in queenless Apis cerana workers supports the reproductive ground—plan hypothesis of social evolution. J Insect Behav 21:317–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttner F, Hesse B (1981) Specific differences in the development of ovaries and egg-laying of queenless workers of several races of the honeybee, Apis mellifera L. Apidologie 12:159–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snodgrass RE (1956) Anatomy of the honey bee. Comstock, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppasata T, Smith DR, Deowanisha S, Wongsiri S (2007) Matrilineal origins of Apis mellifera in Thailand. Apidologie 38:323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan K, Yang M, Radloff S, Pirk CWW, Crewe RM, Phiancharoen M, Hepburn R, Oldroyd BP (2009) Worker reproduction in mixed-species colonies of honey bees. Behav Ecol 20:1106–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarpy DR, Nielsen R, Nielsen DI (2004) A scientific note on the revised estimates of effective paternity frequency in Apis. Insectes Sociaux 51:203–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velthuis HHW, Clement JL, Morse RA, Laigo FM (1971) The ovaries of Apis dorsata from the Philippines. J Apic Res 10:63–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Kaftanoglu O, Siegel AJ, Page RE Jr, Amdam GV (2010) Surgically increased ovarian mass in the honey bee confirms link between reproductive physiology and worker behaviour. J Ins Physiol 56:1816–1824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Oldroyd BP, Good G, Halling L, Ratnieks FLW, Wongsiri S (2002) Lack of worker reproduction in the giant honey bee Apis dorsata Fabricius. Insectes Sociaux 49:80–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Oldroyd BP, Wongsiri S, Palmer K, Paar R (2003) A scientific note on the mating frequency of Apis dorsata. Apidologie 34:85–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wongvilas S, Higgs JS, Beekman M, Wattanachaiyingcharoen W, Deowanish S, Oldroyd BP (2010) Lack of interspecific parasitism between the dwarf honeybees Apis andreniformis and Apis florea. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64:1165–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prachaval Sukumalanand, Deborah Smith, Gudrun and Nikolaus Königer, Evelyn Hunggims, Michael Burgett, and all members of the social insect group at UNCG for their kind practical support. We also thank Gudrun and Nikolaus Königer and four anonymous reviewers for their comments on a previous version of the manuscript. This work was supported financially by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, US Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 2010-65104-20533, the National Institute of Aging (#PO1 AG22500), the National Science Foundation (#0615502), and the National Research University Project of Thailand's Office of the Higher Education Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olav Rueppell.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 202 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rueppell, O., Phaincharoen, M., Kuster, R. et al. Cross-species correlation between queen mating numbers and worker ovary sizes suggests kin conflict may influence ovary size evolution in honeybees. Naturwissenschaften 98, 795 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0822-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0822-z

Keywords

Navigation