Skip to main content
Log in

Loss of legs: is it or not a handicap for an orb-weaving spider?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leg loss is a common phenomenon in spiders, and according to the species 5% to 40% of the adults can present at least one missing leg. There is no possibility of regeneration after adult moult and the animal must manage with its missing appendages until its death. With the loss of one or more legs, female orb-weaving spiders can be penalized twice: firstly, because the legs are necessary for web construction and secondly, the legs are essential for the control of the prey after its interception by the web. During development, spiders may be also penalized because regeneration has energetic costs that take away resources for survival, growth and reproduction. All these consequences should influence negatively the development of the spider and thus its fitness. We investigated the impact of leg loss in the orb-weaving spider, Zygiella x-notata by studying its frequency in a natural population and web building and prey capture behaviours in laboratory. In field populations, 9.5% to 13%, of the adult females presented the loss of one or more legs; the majority of individuals had lost only one leg (in 48% of cases, a first one). Leg loss seems to affect all the adult spiders, as there is no difference of mass between intact spiders and those with missing leg. Data obtained with laboratory-reared spiders, showed that the loss of legs due to the moult is rare (less than 1%). Considering changes in web design, spiders with missing legs decreased their silk investment, increased the distance between spiral turns but did not change the capture surface of the web. Under our laboratory experimental conditions, spiders with one or two lost legs did not present any difference in prey capture efficiency. In laboratory conditions, spiders with lost leg(s) did not show any difference in egg sac production or in longevity (adult lifespan) compared to intact spiders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amaya CC, Klawinski PD, Formanowicz DR (2001) The effects of leg autotomy on running speed and foraging ability in two species of wolf spider (Lycosidae). Am Midl Nat 145:201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apontes P, Brown CA (2005) Between-sex variation in running speed and a potential cost of leg autotomy in the wolf spider Pirata sedentarius. Am Midl Nat 154:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bel-Venner MC, Venner S (2006) Mate-guarding strategies and male competitive ability in an orb-weaving spider: results from a field study. Anim Behav 71:1315–1322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge TA, Eliason CM (2007) Functionally independent components of prey capture are architecturally constrained in spider orb webs. Biol Lett 22:456–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackledge TA, Zevengergen JM (2006) Mesh width influences prey retention in spider orb webs. Ethology 112:1194–1201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock RE, Smith LD (1998) Recovery of claw size and function following autotomy in Cancer productus (Decapoda: Brachyura). Biol Bull 194:53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brueseke MA, Rypstra AL, Walker SE, Persons MH (2001) Leg autotomy in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina: a common phenomenon with apparent few costs. Am Midl Nat 146:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisner T, Camazine S (1983) Spider leg autotomy induced by prey venom injection: an adaptative response to “pain”? Proc Natl Acad Sci Unit States Am 80:3382–3385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fleming PA, Muller D, Bateman PW (2007) Leave it behind: a taxonomic perspective of autotomy in invertebrates. Biol Rev 82:481–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Foelix RF (1996) Biology of spiders. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz DR (1990) The antipredator efficacy of spider leg autotomy. Anim Behav 40:400–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fromhage L, Schneider J (2006) Emasculation to plug up females: the significance of pedipalp damage in Nephila fenestrata. Behav Ecol 10:353–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guffey C (1999) Costs associated with leg autotomy in the harvestmen Leiobunum nigripes and Leiobunum vittatum (Arachnida: Opiliones). Can J Zool 77:824–830

    Google Scholar 

  • Herberstein ME, Heiling AM (1998) Does mesh height influence prey length in orb webs spiders (Araneae). Eur J Entomol 95:367–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson SA, Jakob EM (1999) Leg autotomy in a spider has minimal costs in competitive ability and development. Anim Behav 57:957–965

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krink T, Vollrath F (1999) A virtual robot to model the use of regenerated leg in a web- building spider. Anim Behav 57:223–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lutzy RM, Morse DH (2008) Effects of leg loss on male crab spiders Misumena vatia. Anim Behav 76:1519–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maginnis TL (2006) The costs of autotomy and regeneration in animals: a review and framework for future research. Behav Ecol 17:857–872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murakami Y (1983) Factors determining the prey size of the orb-web Argiope amoena (L. Koch) (Argiopidae). Oecologia 57:72–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts MJ (1996) Spiders of Britain and Northern Europe—Collins Field Guide. Harper Collins Publishers Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rypstra AL, Schmidt JM, Reif BD, DeVito J, Persons MH (2007) Tradeoffs involved in site selection and foraging in a wolf spider: effects of substrate structure and predation risk. Oikos 116:853–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval CP (1994) Plasticity in web design in the spider Parawixia bistriata: a response to variable prey type. Funct Ecol 8:701–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharf I, Lubin Y, Ovadia O (2010) Foraging decisions and behavioural flexibility in trap building predators: a review. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. doi:10.1111/j.1469-185X.2010.00163.x

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor PW, Roberts JA, Uetz GW (2006) Compensation for injury? Modified multi- modal courtship of wolf spiders following autotomy of signalling appendages. Ethol Ecol Evol 18:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uetz GW, McClintock WJ, Smith EI, Cook KK (1996) Limb regeneration and subsequent asymmetry in a male secondary sexual character influences sexual selection in wolf spiders. Zool Sci 6:927–933

    Google Scholar 

  • Venner S, Casas J (2005) Spider webs designed for rare but life-saving catches. Pro R Soc B 272:1587–1592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venner S, Thevenard L, Pasquet A, Leborgne R (2001) Estimation of the web's capture thread length in the orb-weaving spiders: determination of the most efficient formula. Ann Entomol Soc Am 94:490–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F (1987) Altered geometry of webs in spiders with regenerated leg. Nature 328:247–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath F (1990) Leg regeneration in web spiders and its implication of Weaver phylogeny. Bull Brit Arachnol Soc 8:177–184

    Google Scholar 

  • Witt PN, Reed CF, Peakall DB (1968) A spider's web, problems in regulatory biology. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrinn KM, Uetz GW (2007) Impacts of leg loss and regeneration on body condition, growth, and development time in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata. Can J Zool 85:823–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrinn KM, Uetz GW (2008) Effects of autotomy and regeneration on detection and capture of prey in a generalist predator. Behav Ecol 19:1282–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Aknowledgements

This study has been conducted at the H. Poincaré Nancy University. We thank J. Marchal and L. Bahans who helped us collect and rear spiders in 2008 and 2009. Many thanks also to Dr. Y. Lubin, Dr. C. Gilbert and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alain Pasquet.

Additional information

Communicated by: Sven Thatje

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pasquet, A., Anotaux, M. & Leborgne, R. Loss of legs: is it or not a handicap for an orb-weaving spider?. Naturwissenschaften 98, 557–564 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0799-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-011-0799-7

Keywords

Navigation