Skip to main content
Log in

Duale Plättchenhemmung in der Intensivmedizin

Dual platelet inhibitors in intensive care units

  • Innovationen in der Intensivmedizin
  • Published:
Medizinische Klinik - Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Die Einführung von Clopidogrel war ein Meilenstein in der Entwicklung der modernen Antiplättchentherapie. Jedoch haben die Unzulänglichkeiten in der Pharmakokinetik von Clopidogrel die Suche nach alternativen Substanzen beflügelt.

Aktuelles Konzept

Prasugrel und Ticagrelor, 2 neue Substanzen, wurden in die aktuellen Leitlinien zur Behandlung von Patienten mit akutem Koronarsyndrom aufgenommen. Die potenten Plättchenhemmer gehen jedoch mit einer erhöhten Rate an Blutungen einher, was bei einem kritisch kranken Patienten von besonderer Bedeutung erscheint. Allerdings sind auch die neuen Plättchenhemmer bei schockierten oder gekühlten Patienten im Vergleich zum Gesamtkollektiv weniger wirksam.

Ausblick

Die rezenten Studien unterstreichen die Beurteilung des klinischen Nettonutzens im Patientenmanagement. Nachdem es nur eine dünne Linie zwischen Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit bei kritisch kranken Patenten gibt, erscheinen zukünftige Studien zur Risikostratifizierung der antithrombozytären Therapie im Sinne der personalisierten Medizin bei Intensivpatienten obligatorisch zu sein.

Abstract

Background

The introduction of clopidogrel was a milestone in the development of modern antiplatelet therapy. However, the shortcomings in the pharmacokinetics of clopidogrel have led to the development of alternative substances.

Current concept

The two new drugs prasugrel and ticagrelor were included in the current guidelines for the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndrome. These potent platelet inhibitors, however, are associated with an increased rate of bleeding events, which is of particular importance in critically ill patients. However, the new platelet inhibitors are less effective in patients with cardiogenic shock or patients treated with therapeutic hypothermia.

Future

Recent studies underscore the assessment of the net clinical benefit in patient management. Since there is only a thin line between efficacy and safety in critically ill patients, future studies for risk stratification of antiplatelet therapy in terms of personalized medicine are mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatur

  1. Steg PG et al (2012) ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation: the task force on the management of ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 33:2569–2619

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hamm CW et al (2011) ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 32:2999–3054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Siller-Matula JM (2012) Der Thrombozyt beim ACS. In: Alber H (Hrsg) Thrombozytenhemmung beim akuten Koronarsyndrom. Unimed Verlag, S 31–40

  4. Farid NA, Kurihara A, Wrighton SA (2010) Metabolism and disposition of the thienopyridine antiplatelet drugs ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and prasugrel in humans. J Clin Pharmacol 50:126–142

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Siller-Matula JM, Christ G, Lang IM et al (2010) Multiple electrode aggregometry predicts stent thrombosis better than the VASP assay. J Thromb Haemost 8:351–359

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Siller-Matula JM et al (2012) Phenotyping vs. genotyping for prediction of clopidogrel efficacy and safety: the PEGASUS-PCI study. J Thromb Haemost 10:529–542

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siller-Matula JM, Krumphuber J, Jilma B (2009) Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic and clinical profile of novel antiplatelet drugs targeting vascular disease. Br J Pharmacol 159:502–517

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Brandt JT et al (2007) A comparison of prasugrel and clopidogrel loading doses on platelet function: magnitude of platelet inhibition is related to active metabolite formation. Am Heart J 153:66 e9–16

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Siller-Matula J, Huber K (2013) Klinische Studien mit neuen Plättchenfunktionshemmern. In: Schrör K, Kirch W (Hrsg) Pharmakologie und Klinik neuer Antiplättchensubstanzen. Schattauer, S 23–46

  10. Wiviott SD et al (2007) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 357:2001–2015

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Wiviott SD et al (2008) Greater clinical benefit of more intensive oral antiplatelet therapy with prasugrel in patients with diabetes mellitus in the trial to assess improvement in therapeutic outcomes by optimizing platelet inhibition with prasugrel-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 38. Circulation 118:1626–1636

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Roe MT et al (2012) Prasugrel versus clopidogrel for acute coronary syndromes without revascularization. N Engl J Med 367(14):1297–1309

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Montalescot G et al (2013) Pretreatment with prasugrel in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 369:999–1010

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wallentin L et al (2009) Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 361:1045–1057

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mahaffey KW et al (2011) Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel by geographic region in the Platelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial. Circulation 124:544–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Schror K (2012) New antiplatelet agents and the question of dual antiplatelet therapy. Internist (Berl) 53:351–356

  17. Hobl EL, Derhaschnig U, Firbas C et al (2013) Reversal strategy in antagonizing the P2Y -inhibitor ticagrelor. Eur J Clin Invest 43(12):1258–1261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bednar F et al (2013) Prasugrel, but not clopidogrel, is effective in platelet inhibition in patients treated by therapeutic hypothermia after cardiac arrest for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J 34(Abstract Supplement):892

    Google Scholar 

  19. Penela D et al (2013) Hypothermia in acute coronary syndrome: brain salvage versus stent thrombosis? J Am Coll Cardiol 61:686–687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tortorici MA, Kochanek PM, Poloyac SM (2007) Effects of hypothermia on drug disposition, metabolism, and response: a focus of hypothermia-mediated alterations on the cytochrome P450 enzyme system. Crit Care Med 35:2196–2204

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Korte W et al (2011) Peri-operative management of antiplatelet therapy in patients with coronary artery disease: joint position paper by members of the working group on Perioperative Haemostasis of the Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis Research (GTH), the working group on Perioperative Coagulation of the Austrian Society for Anesthesiology, Resuscitation and Intensive Care (OGARI) and the Working Group Thrombosis of the European Society for Cardiology (ESC). Thromb Haemost 105:743–749

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahla E, Raggam R, Toller W (2013) Platelet function testing to time surgery in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy? Hamostaseologie 34

  23. Hansen ML et al (2010) Risk of bleeding with single, dual, or triple therapy with warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel in patients with atrial fibrillation. Arch Intern Med 170:1433–1441

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Huber K, Siller-Matula J, Schrör K (2013) Antiplättchentherapie -aktueller Stand und zukünftige Entwicklungen. In: Schrör K, Kirch W (Hrsg) Pharmakologie und Klinik neuer Antiplättchensubstanzen. Schattauer, S 155–164

  25. Lip GY et al (2010) Management of antithrombotic therapy in atrial fibrillation patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and/or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention/stenting. Thromb Haemost 103:13–28

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Einhaltung ethischer Richtlinien

Interessenkonflikt. G. Delle-Karth erhielt Vortrags- oder Beraterhonorare von AstraZeneca und Daiichi Sankyo. J.M. Siller-Matula erhielt Vortrags- oder Beraterhonorare vom AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly und Daiichi Sankyo.

Dieser Beitrag beinhaltet keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Delle Karth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siller-Matula, J., Delle Karth, G. Duale Plättchenhemmung in der Intensivmedizin. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 109, 429–436 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-014-0394-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00063-014-0394-8

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation