Skip to main content
Log in

Hare and vole browsing preferences during winter

  • Published:
Acta Theriologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim with this study was to, under controlled conditions, determine the food preference of mountain haresLepus timidus Linnaeus, 1758 and bank volesClethrionomys glareolus (Schreber, 1780) for a substantial part of the woody plants potentially available for these herbivores during winter. In addition, we compared hare and vole preference patterns. Thirteen woody plant species were simultaneously presented to 9 captive voles and 9 captive hares in preference tests during winter. Consumption by hares from 50 g bundles (one per species) was measured after 3 h, whereas shoot consumption by voles was measured after 12 h. Both hares and voles preferred deciduous species to conifers,Populus tremula, andVaccinium myrtillus being the most preferred species. However, there was considerable variation in palatability among deciduous plant species and only a marginally significant correlation was found between hare and vole preference. One striking differences between hares and voles was that Sorbusaucuparia was the most utilised by voles but the least preferred by hares. In conclusion, deciduous plant species were generally considerably more palatable to hares and voles than conifers, which is consistent with current theories. Nevertheless, the high variation in palatability among deciduous trees and the difference in preference between hares and voles indicate more complex and species-specific patterns with regard to plant— animal interactions. The latter also suggests that hares and voles differ in their dietary adaptations and have different dietary constrains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batzli G. O. and Lesieutre C. 1991. The influence of quality food on habitat use by arctic microtine rodents. Oikos 60: 299–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belovsky G. E. 1981. Food plant selection by a generalist herbivore: the moose. Ecology 62: 1020–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergström R. and Hjeljord O. 1987. Moose and vegetation in north-western Europe and Poland. Swedish Wildlife Research, Suppl. 1: 213–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J. P. and Kuropat P. J. 1980. Selection of winter forage by subarctic browsing herbivores: the role of plant chemistry. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 11: 261–285.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J. P., Chapin III F. S. and Klein D. R. 1983a. Carbon/nutrient balance of boreal plants in relation to vertebrate herbivory. Oikos 40: 357–368.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J. P., Wieland G. D., Reichardt P. B., Lewis W. E. and McCarthy M. C. 1983b. Pinosylvin methyl ethers deter snowshoe hare feeding on green alder. Science 222: 1023–1025.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant J. P., Tahvanainen J., Sulkinoja M., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Reichard P. and Green T. 1989. Biogeographical evidence for the evolution of chemical defence by boreal birch and willow against mammalian browsing. The American Naturalist 134: 20–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley P. D. 1987. Interspecific variation in plant anti-herbivory properties: the role of habitat quality and rate of disturbance. New Phytologist 106: 251–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley P. D. 1988. Effect of plant growth rate and leaf lifetime on the amount and type of anti-herbivore defence. Oecologia 74: 531–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coley P. D., Bryant J. P. and Chapin III F. S. 1985. Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defence. Science 230: 895–899.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K., Edenius L. and Lundberg P. 1991. Herbivory and tree stand composition: moose patch use in winter. Ecology 72: 1350–1357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danell K., Elmqvist T., Ericson L. and Salomonson A. 1987. Are there general patterns in bark-eating by voles on different shoot types of woody plants? Oikos 50: 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenius L. 1991. The effect of resource depletion on the feeding behaviour of a browser: winter foraging by moose on Scots pine. Journal of Applied Ecology 28: 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L., Elmqvist T., Jacobsson K., Danell K. and Salomonson A. 1992. Age structure in boreal willows and fluctuations in herbivores populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 98 B: 75–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P. 1976. Plant apparency and chemical defence. [In: Recent advances in phytochemistry. Vol. 10. J. W. Wallace and R. L. Mansell, eds]. Plenum Press, New York: 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill R. M. A. 1992a. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry 65: 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill R. M. A. 1992b. A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 2. Small mammals. Forestry 65: 281–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 1969. Spring populations of small mammals in central Swedish Lapland. Oikos 20: 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 1985.Clethrionomys food: generic, specific and regional characteristics. Annaes Zoologici Fennici 22: 315–318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 1988. Grazing impact by small rodents in a steep cyclicity gradient. Oikos 51: 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 1993. Food preferences of voles related to post-weaning nutrition. Oikos 68: 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson L. 2002. Dynamics and trophic interactions of small rodents: landscape or regional effects on spatial variation. Oecologia 130: 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herms D. A. and Mattson W. A. 1992. The dilemma of plants: to grow or defend. The Quaterly Review of Biology 67: 282–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjältén J. 1992. Plant sex and hare feeding preference. Oecologia 89: 253–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • J., Danell K. and Ericson L. 1996. Food selection by two vole species in relation to plant growth strategies and plant chemistry. Oikos 76: 181–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjältén J., Danell K. and Lundberg P. 1993. Herbivore avoidance by association: vole and hare utilisation of woody plants. Oikos 68: 125–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjältén J. and Palo T. 1992. Selection of deciduous trees by free-ranging voles and hares in relation to plant chemistry. Oikos 63: 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iason G. R. and Palo R. T. 1991. The effect of birch phenolics on a grazing and browsing mammal: a comparison of hares. Journal of Chemical Ecology 17: 1733–1743.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Iason G. R. and Waterman P. G. 1988. Avoidance of plant phenolics by juvenile and reproducing female mountain hares in summer. Functional Ecology 2: 433–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jing S. W. and Coley P. D. 1990. Dioecy and herbivory: the effect of growth rate on plant defences inAcer negundo. Oikos 58: 369–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Julkunen-Tiitto R. 1989. Distribution of certain phenolics inixspecies (Salicaceae). PhD thesis, University of Joensuu, Joensuu, Finland: 32–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlsen S. 1983. Winter food preference of mountain hare in Norway. Finnish Game Research 412: 67–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson T-B. 1975. Damage caused by small rodents in Sweden. Ecological Bulletins 19: 7–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller G. R., Kinnaird J. W. and Cummins R. P. 1982. Liability of saplings to browsing on a red deer range in the Scottish highlands. Journal of Applied Ecology 19: 941–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen J., Gardjell H., Oksanen L., Ericson L. and Ekerholm P. 1993. Grazing by food limited microtine rodents on a productive experimental plant community: does the “green desert” exist? Oikos 68: 401–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mossberg B., Stenberg L. and Ericsson S. 1993. [The Nordic Flora]. Wahlström & Widstrand, Sweden: 1–690. [In Swedish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Palo R. T., Å. and Knutsson P.-G. 1983. Can birch phenolics be of importance in the defence against browsing vertebrates. Finnish Game Research 41: 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulliainen E. and Tunkkari P. S. 1987. Winter diet, habitat selection and fluctuation of a mountain hareus timiduspopulation in Finnish Forest Lapland. Holarctic Ecology 10: 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao S. J., Iason G. R., Hulbert I. A. R., Elston D. A. and Racey P. A. 2003. The effect of sapling density, heather height and season on browsing by mountain hares on birch. Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 626–638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichardt P. B., Bryant J. P., Anderson B. J., Phillips D., Clausen T. P., Meyer M. and Frisby K. 1990. Germacrone defends labrador tea from browsing by snowshoe hares. Journal of Chemical Ecology 6: 1961–1970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice W. R. 1989. Analysing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43: 23–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers A. R. and Lewis M. C. 1985. Diet selection in Artic lemmings (Lemmus sibericusandDicrostonyx groenlandiscus: food preferences. Canadian Journal of Zoology 63: 1161–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers A. R. and Sinclair A. R. E. 1997. Diet choice and nutrition of captive snowshoe hares (Lepus americanus: interaction of energy, protein, and secondary compounds. Écoscience 4: 163–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohner C. and Ward D. 1997. Chemical and mechanical defence against two sympatric species of desert Acacia. Journal of Vegetation Science 8: 717–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousi M., Tahvanainen J., Henttonen H. and Outila I. 1993. Effects of shading and fertilization on ressitance of winter-dormant birch (Betula pendula to voles and hares. Ecology 74: 30–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousi M., Tahvanainen J. and Outila I. 1989. Inter- and intraspecific variation in the resistance of winter-dormant birch (Betulaspp.) against browsing be the mountain hare. Holarctic Ecology 12: 187–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousi M., Tahvanainen J. and Outila I. 1991. A mechanism of resistnace to hare browsing in winter-dormant European white birch (Betula pendula. The American Naturalist 137: 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley L. A., Blomquist S. and Danell K. 1998. Diet choices made by free ranging moose on northern Sweden in relation to plant distribution, chemistry and morphology. Canadian Journal of Zoology 76: 1722–1733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahvanainen J., Helle E., Julkunen-Tiitto R. and Lavola A. 1985. Phenolic compounds of willow bark as deterrents against feeding by mountain hare. Oecologia 65: 319–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahvanainen J., Julkunen-Tiitto R., Rousi M. and Reichardt P. B. 1991. Chemical determinants of resistance in winter-dormant seedlings of European white birch (Betula pendula) to browsing by mountain hare. Chemoecology 2: 49–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner I. M. 1995. Foliar defences and habitat adversity of three woody plant communities in Singapore. Functional Ecology 9: 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westoby M. 1974. An analysis of diet selection by large generalist herbivores. The American Naturalist 108: 290–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Associate Editor was Krzysztof Schmidt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hjältén, J., Danell, K. & Ericson, L. Hare and vole browsing preferences during winter. Acta Theriol 49, 53–62 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192508

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03192508

Key words

Navigation