Skip to main content
Log in

IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology

  • Published:
The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The new IMPACT 2002+ life cycle impact assessment methodology proposes a feasible implementation of a combined midpoint/damage approach, linking all types of life cycle inventory results (elementary flows and other interventions) via 14 midpoint categories to four damage categories. For IMPACT 2002+, new concepts and methods have been developed, especially for the comparative assessment of human toxicity and ecotoxicity. Human Damage Factors are calculated for carcinogens and non-carcinogens, employing intake fractions, best estimates of dose-response slope factors, as well as severities. The transfer of contaminants into the human food is no more based on consumption surveys, but accounts for agricultural and livestock production levels. Indoor and outdoor air emissions can be compared and the intermittent character of rainfall is considered. Both human toxicity and ecotoxicity effect factors are based on mean responses rather than on conservative assumptions. Other midpoint categories are adapted from existing characterizing methods (Eco-indicator 99 and CML 2002). All midpoint scores are expressed in units of a reference substance and related to the four damage categories human health, ecosystem quality, climate change, and resources. Normalization can be performed either at midpoint or at damage level. The IMPACT 2002+ method presently provides characterization factors for almost 1500 different LCI-results, which can be downloaded at http://www.epfl.ch/impact

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barroin G (2003): Phosphore, Azote et Prolifération des Végétaux Aquatiques. Courrier de l’Environnement de 1’INRA; no. 48, 13–25

  • Bennett DH, Margni M, McKone TE, Jolliet O (2002b): Intake Fraction for Multimedia Pollutants: A Tool for Life Cycle Analysis and Comparative Risk Assessment. Risk Analysis 22, 903–916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett DH, McKone TE, Evans JS, Nazaroff WW, Margni MD, Jolliet O, Smith KR (2002a): Defining Intake Fraction. Environ Sci Technol 36, 207A-211A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • BUWAL (1999): Ökologische Bewertung mit Hilfe der Grauen Energie. Schriftenreihe Umwelt, Ökobilanzen, Vol. 307, Bern (CH)

    Google Scholar 

  • Crettaz P, Pennington D, Rhomberg L, Brand B, Jolliet O (2002): Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED 10s and DALYs: Part 1-Cancer Effects. Risk Analysis 22, 931–946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frischknecht et al. (2003): ecoinvent Database, http://www.ecoinvent.ch/

  • Goedkoop M, Spriensma R (2000): The Eco-indicator 99: A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Assessment, Methodology Report, second edition. Pré Consultants, Amersfoort (NL), Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée JB, Gorrée M, Heijungs R, Huppes G, Kleijn R, van Oers L, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Suh S, Udo de Haes HA, de Bruijn H, van Duin R, Huijbregts MAJ (2002): Life Cycle Assessment: An Operational Guide to the ISO Standards. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauschild M, Wenzel H (1998): Environmental Assessment of Products-Vol. 2: Scientific Background, Chapman & Hall, London (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Heijungs R, Guinée JB, Huppes G, Lankreijer RM, Udo de Haes HA, Wegener Sleeswijk A, Ansems AMM, Eggels PG, van Duin R, Goede HP (1992): Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Products. Centre of Environmental Science (CML), Leiden (NL)

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2001): Climate change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), http://www.grida.no/climate/ipcc tar/. 385–391

  • Jolliet O (1994): Critical Surface-Time: An Evaluation Method for Life Cycle Assessment. In: Udo de Haes HA et al. (Ed.): Integrating Impact Assessment into LCA. SETAC Press, 133–142

  • Jolliet O, Brent A, Goedkoop M, Itsubo N, Mueller-Wenk R, Peña C, Schenk R, Stewart M, Weidema B (2003a): LCIA Definition Study of the SETAC-UNEP Life Cycle Initiative. UNEP, http://www.uneptie.org/pc/sustain/lcinitiative/

  • Jolliet O, Crettaz P (1997): Critical Surface-Time 95, a Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology, including Exposure and Fate, EPFL (CH)

  • Jolliet O, Pennington D, Amman C, Pelichet T, Margni M, Crettaz P (2003b): Comparative Assessment of the Toxic Impact of Metals on Humans within IMPACT 2002. In: Dubreuil A (Ed.): Life Cycle Assessment of Metals-Issues and Research Directions, SETAC Press, ISBN 1-880611-62-7

  • Murray C, Lopez A (1996): The Global Burden of Disease, a Comprehensive Assessment of Mortality and Disability from Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors in 1990 and Projected to 2020. Global Burden of Disease and Injury Series, Vol.1 & 2; Harvard School of Public Health, World Health Organization and World Bank

  • Payet J (2002): Developpement de la Méthode AMI. ADEME Report, Agence de l’Environnement et de la Maîtrise de l’Energie; Paris (F)

    Google Scholar 

  • Payet J, Jolliet O (2003): Comparative Assessment of the Toxic Impact of Metals on Aquatic Ecosystems: the AMI Method. In: Dubreuil A (Ed.): Life Cycle Assessment of Metals-Issues and Research Directions, SETAC Press, ISBN 1-880611-62-7

  • Payet J, Pennington D, Hauschild M., Jolliet O (2003): Comparative Assessment of Toxic Impacts on Aquatic Ecosystems: The AMI method (Assessment of the Mean Impact). Submitted to Environ Toxicol Chem

  • Pennington D, Amman C, Pelichet T, Margni M, Jolliet O (2003b): Spatial Multimedia Chemical Fate and Human Exposure Model for Western Europe. Submitted to Environ Sci Technol

  • Pennington D, Crettaz P, Tauxe A, Rhomberg L, Brand B, Jolliet O (2002): Assessing Human Health Response in Life Cycle Assessment Using ED 10s and DALYs: Part 2-Noncancer Effects. Risk Analysis 22, 947–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington D, Margni M, Payet J, Charles R, Jolliet O (2003a): Estimating Cumulative Toxicological Risks and Potential Impacts for Human Health and Ecosystems in LCA. Submitted to Environ Toxicol Chem

  • Steen B (1999): A systematic Approach to Environmental Priority Strategies in Product Development (EPS). 2000-General System Characteristics & 2000-Models and Data. Chalmers, CPM report: 1999, 4 and 5, http://eps.esa.chalmers.se/download.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Jolliet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R. et al. IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J LCA 8, 324–330 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02978505

Keywords

Navigation