Skip to main content
Log in

Mercy, death, and politics: An analysis of executions and commutations in New York State, 1935–1963

  • Articles
  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on the 249 executions and the 49 commutations not based upon any policy per se of the New York State governors between the years 1935 and 1963. Clemency is an inherently political decision. Therefore, it is expected that groups which are disfavored or viewed as dangerous (blacks, males, felony murderers, and non-youthful offenders) will register higher execution rates than favored groups. Contingency tables and logistic regression analyses offer partial support in that offender race and age are significantly related to final disposition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acker, J. R. (1990). New York’s proposed death penalty legislation: Constitutional and policy perspectives.Albany Law Review, 54, 515–616.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abromowitz, E. & Paget, D. (1964). Executive clemency in capital cases.New York University Law Review, 39, 136–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H. A. (1964). Death sentences in New Jersey, 1907–1960.Rutgers Law Review, 19, 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H. A. (1965). Capital punishment in Oregon, 1903–1964.Oregon Law Review, 45, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedau, H. A. (1990–1991). The decline of executive clemency in capital cases.N.Y.U. Review of Law & Social Change, 38, 255–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, C. (1974).Capital punishment: The inevitability of caprice and mistake. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohm, R. M. (1991). American death penalty opinion 1936–1986: A critical examination of the Gallup polls. In R. M. Bohm (Ed.),The death penalty in America: Current research (pp. 113–142). Highland Heights, KY: Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. (1984).Legal homicide: Death as punishment in America. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers, W. J. & Pierce, G. L. (1980). Arbitration and discrimination under post-Furman capital statutes.Crime & Delinquency, 26, 563–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espy, W. & Smykla, J. O. (1994).Executions in the United States, 1608–1991: The Espy file. Ann Arbor, MI: Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera v. Collins, 113 U.S. 853 (1993).

  • Johnson, E. H. (1957). Selective factors in capital punishment.Social Forces, 36, 165–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobil, D. T. (1991). The quality of mercy strained: Wrestling the pardoning power from the king.Texas Law Review, 69, 569–641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumer, M. & Tenney, N. (1995). The death penalty in New York: An historical perspective.Journal of Law & Policy, 4, 81–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangum, C. S., Jr. (1940).The legal status of the negro. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marquart, J. W. & Ekland-Olson, S., & Sorenson, J. R. (1994).The rope, the chair and the needle: Capital punishment in Texas 1923–1990. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maryland Legislative Council Committee (1962).Report of the legislative council committee on capital punishment. Baltimore: Maryland State Legislature.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, G. A. (ed.) (1995).The red book (93rd ed.). Guilderland, NY: New York Legal Publishing Corp.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Constitution, Article 4, §4.

  • Ohio Legislative Service Commission (1961).Capital punishment research report no. 46. Columbus: State of Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyk, R. S. & Rubinfeld, D. L. (1981).Econometric models and economic forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streib, V. L. (1998). Executing women, children, and the retarded: Second-class citizens in capital punishment. In J. R. Acker, R. M. Bohm, & C. S. Lanier (Eds.),America’s experiment with capital punishment: Reflections on the past, present, and future of the ultimate penal sanction. Durham, NC: Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, R. J. (1986). The death of fairness: The arbitrary and capricious imposition of the death penalty in the 1980’s.New York University Review of Law & Social Change, 14, 797–848.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vandiver, M. (1993). The quality of mercy: Race and clemency in Florida death penalty cases, 1924–1966.University of Richmond Law Review, 27, 315–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisberg, R. (1983). Deregulating death.Supreme Court Review, 8, 305–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfgang, M. E. & Kelly, A. K., & Nolde, H.C. (1962). Comparison of the executed and commuted among admissions to death row.Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology & Police Science, 53, 301–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua D. Freilich.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freilich, J.D., Rivera, C.J. Mercy, death, and politics: An analysis of executions and commutations in New York State, 1935–1963. Am J Crim Just 24, 15–29 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887615

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02887615

Keywords

Navigation