Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Chan, Wing-tsit, trans. 1963.The Platform Scripture: The Basic Classic of Zen Buddhism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969.A Source Book in Chinese Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Litian. 2000. “Zen Buddhism of theTathāgata and Zen Buddhism of the Master.Zhongguo Shehui Kexue. No. 5: 130–140.

  • Gregory, Peter. 1994. “Tsung-mi and the Problem ofHongaku shiso.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute (Komazawa University). No. 5: 200–151.

  • Hakamaya, Noriaki. 1989.Critique of Original Enlightenment Thought (Hongaku shiso hihan). Tokyo: Daizo Shupan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, Martin. 1966.Discourse on Thinking. Trans. by John Anderson. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu, Shi. 1953. “Ch’an (Zen) Buddhism in China.”Philosophy East and West 3: 3–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huikai.The Gateless Gate. InDaizokyo 48.

  • Hubbard, James, & Paul Swanson, eds. 1997.Pruning the Bodhi Tree: Storm over Critical Buddhism. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jan, Yun-hua. 1988.Zongmi. Taibei: Dongda Chubanshe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, Shiro. 1977. “Critiques ofTathāgata Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No.55: 232–215.

  • —. 1994.Critical Studies on Zen Thought (Zen shiso no hihanteki kenkyu). Tokyo: Taizo Shuppan.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1996. “Buddha-nature as the Principle of Discrimination.”Komazawa Daigaku Bukkyugakubu Ronshu. No. 27: 328–296.

  • —. 1997a. “The Doctrine ofTathāgata-garhha Is Not Buddhist” Translated by Jaime Hubbard. In Jamie Hubbard and Paul Swanson, ed. Hawaii: Hawaii University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1997b. “Critiques of Tathāgatagarbha Thought in Buddhist Philosophy.”Journal of the Faculty of Buddhism. Komazawa University. No 55: 232–215.

  • -. 1999. “Critical Considerations on Zen Thought.”Annual Report of the Zen Institute. Komazawa University. No. 10: 238–217.

  • Mou, Zongsan. 1982.Buddha-Nature and Prajna. Taipei: Xuesheng Shuju.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nāgājuna.Mādhyamika. InDaizokyo 30.

  • Nishitani, Keiji. 1982.Religion and Nothingness. Trans. by Jan Van Bragt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki, Daisetz Teitaro. 1953. “Zen: A Reply to Hu Shih.”Philosophy East and West 3: 25–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson, Paul. 1993. “‘Zen is Not Buddhism’: Recent Japanese Critiques of Buddha-Nature.”Numan 40: 115–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zongmi.Preface to Origins of the Various Chan Teachings. Daizokyo 48.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Brock University, L23 3A1, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada

    Chan Wing-cheuk (Associate Professor of Philosophy)

Authors
  1. Chan Wing-cheuk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chan Wing-cheuk.

Additional information

Dedicated to Prof. Jan Yun-hua

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wing-cheuk, C. Mou Zongsan on Zen Buddhism. Dao 5, 73–88 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857005

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02857005

Keywords

Search

Navigation