Skip to main content
Log in

Early internet IPOs versus subsequent entrants

  • Published:
Journal of Economics and Finance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines whether investors in early Internet IPOs earned superior returns to those who invested in later entrants. We document three differences between early public firms in a new Internet technology and their followers: underpricing, operating characteristics at the IPO, and stock price performance after the IPO. We find that there is value in going public relatively early in a new Internet technology. Specifically, long-term returns are significantly higher for the early entrants. We also find evidence, consistent with previous studies that examine hot IPO markets, that the early public firms have better operating characteristics at the IPO than later entrants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adamic, Lada A., and Bernardo A. Huberman. 2000. “The Nature of Markets in the World Wide Web.”Quarterly Journal of Electronic Commerce 1: 5–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal, Reena, and Pietra Rivoli. 1990. “Fads in the Initial Public Offering Market?”Financial Management 19: 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, Franklin, Stephen Morris, and Andrew Postlewaite. 1993. “Finite Bubbles with Short Sale Constraints and Asymmetric Information.”Journal of Economic Theory 61: 206–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Brad M., and John D. Lyon. 1997. “Detecting Long-Run Abnormal Stock Returns: The Empirical Power and Specification of Test Statistics.”Journal of Financial Economics 43: 341–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Christopher B., Chris J. Muscarella, John W. Peavy III, and Michael R. Vetsuypens. 1990. “The Role of Venture Capital in the Creation of Public Companies: Evidence from the Going-Public Process.”Journal of Financial Economics 27: 447–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Randolph P. and Jay R. Ritter. 1986. “Investment Banking, Reputation, and the Underpricing of Initial Public Offerings.”Journal of Financial Economics 15: 213–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, Carol M. 2000. “A Longitudianl Study of IPOs in New Industries.”Working Paper, Florida State University.

  • Brav, Alon, and Paul A. Gompers. 1997. “Myth or Reality? The Long-Run Underperformance of Initial Public Offerings: Evidence from Venture and Non-Venture Capital-Backed Companies.”Journal of Finance 52: 1791–1821.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Richard B., Frederick H. Dark, and Ajai K. Singh. 1998. “Underwriter Reputation, Initial Returns, and the Long-Run Performance of IPO Stocks.”Journal of Finance 83: 285–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Richard B., and Stephen Manaster. 1990. “Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation.”Journal of Finance 45: 1045–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedlan, John M. 1994. “Accounting Choices of Issuers of Initial Public Offerings.”Contemporary Accounting Research 11: 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, Mark, and Chuan Y. Hwang, 1989. “Signaling and the Pricing of New Issues.”Journal of Finance 44: 393–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hennessey, Raymond. 2000. “Heavy IPO Calendar is Affecting Offerings.”The Wall Street Journal, August 14, 2000.

  • Hoover's On-Line, IPO Central, www.hoovers.com.

  • Houge, Todd, Tim Loughran, Gerry Suchanek, and Xuemin Yan. 2001. “Divergence of Opinion, Uncertainty, and the Quality of Initial Public Offerings.”Financial Management 30: 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ip, Greg, Susan Pulliam, Scott Thurm, and Ruth Simon. 2001. “The Color Green: The Internet Bubble Broke Records, Rules and Bank Accounts.”The Wall Street Journal, July 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, Tim, and Jay R. Ritter. 1995. “The New Issues Puzzle.”Journal of Finance 50: 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaely, Roni, and Wayne H. Shaw. 1994. “The Pricing of Initial Public Offerings: Tests of the Adverse Selection and Signaling Theories.”Review of Financial Studies 7: 279–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaely, Roni, and Wayne H. Shaw. 1995. “Does the Choice of Auditor Convey Quality in an Initial Public Offering?”Financial Management 24: 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millen, David R. 2000. “Community Portals and Collective Goods: Conversation Archives as an Information Resource.”Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. IEEE Computer Society.

  • Miller, Edward M. 1977. “Risk, Uncertainty, and Divergence of Opinions.”Journal of Finance 32: 1151–1168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasdaq Initial Public Offerings: U.S. Listings.

  • Ritter, Jay R. 1991. “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings.”Journal of Finance 46: 3–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, Jay R. 1998. “Initial Public Offerings.”Contemporary Financial Digest 2: 5–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, Gary P., and James T. Perry, 2000.Electronic Commerce. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Course Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sessa, Danielle. 2000. “Beaten-Down B-to-B Stocks Recover From Deep Slump.”Wall Street Journal, August 11.

  • Shiller, Robert J. 1990. “Speculative Prices and Popular Models.”Journal of Economic Perspectives 4: 55–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, Veda C., Detmar W. Straub, Kathy A. Stewart, and Richard J. Welke. 2000. “A Conceptual Investigation of the E-commerce Industry.”Communications of the ACM 43: 117–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teoh, Siew Hong, Ivo Welch, and T.J. Wong. 1997. “Earnings Management and the Long-Run Market Performance of Initial Public Offerings.”The Jouranl of Finance 53: 1935–1974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSRN.com, Wall Street Research Net, www.wsrn.com.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Marshall, B.B., Crutchley, C.E. & Lending, D. Early internet IPOs versus subsequent entrants. J Econ Finan 28, 104–116 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761458

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02761458

Keywords

Navigation