Skip to main content
Log in

When ignorance is adaptive: Not knowing about the nuclear threat

  • Articles
  • Published:
Knowledge in Society

Yes, he must grasp with his mind the instant-by-instant, inevitable total destruction and prepare for the carnage of an uncertain future Y. Mishima, Sea of Fertility

Abstract

The objective of this article is to examine the nature of individual and social responses to the nuclear threat from psychological and sociological perspectives on ignorance. It is argued that a constructed and managed ignorance concerning the nuclear threat serves many functions, structuring an individual and social reality which is reassuring, meaningful, and both individually and collectively self-serving. A sociology of ignorance framework is employed to articulate the possible benefits of “not knowing about” and collaboratively “not dealing with” the nuclear threat, as well as to define the longer-term costs of ignoring this threat. The distinctive roles played by various kinds of ignorance regarding this important issue are investigated, and the conventional wisdom that knowledge of the consequences of a nuclear war is the only way to prevent its occurrence is challenged.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anders, G. (1971). Reflections on the H-bomb. In P.T. Jerseid (Ed.),Moral issues and Christian reponse (pp. 334–342). New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bok, S. (1978). Lying:Moral choice in public and private life. N.Y.: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, E. (1986). Assumptions, images and skills. In R.W. White (Ed.),Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war (pp. 541–544). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. & Levinson, S.C. (1978). Universals in language use: Politeness phenomena. In E.N. Goody (ed.),Questions and politeness. London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1978). Environmental load and allocation of attention. In A. Baum, J.E. Singer, and S. Valins (Eds.),Advances in environmental psychology (Vol. 1 pp. 1–29). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, D. (1980).The social control of technology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collingridge, D. (1982).Critical decision making. London: Frances Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, T. (1978).Stress. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derber, C. (1979).The pursuit of attention. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1966).Purity and danger. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. & Wildavsky, A. (1982).Risk and culture: An essay on the selection of technical and cultural dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Festinger, L. (1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S.T., Pratto, F., & Pavelchak, M.A. (1983). Citizens' images of nuclear war: Content and consequences.Journal of Social Issues, 39, 41–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foddy, W. & Finighan, W.R. (1980). The concept of privacy from a symbolic interactionist perspective.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 10, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, J. (1981). Sociopsychological aspects of the nuclear arms race. In R.R. Rogers et al. (Eds.),Psychological aspects of nuclear developments (pp. 1–10). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, D.C. & Singer, J.E. (1972).Urban stress. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959).The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgartner, S., Bell, R.C., & O'Connor, R. (1982).Nukespeak. Ringwood, Victoria: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holden, C. (1979). Paul MacLean and the Triune Brain.Science, 204, 1066–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I.L. & Mann, L. (1977). Coping with decisional conflict. In I.L. Janis (Ed.),Current trends in psychology (pp. 306–316). Los Altos, CA: William Kaufman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (Eds.). (1982).Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. N.Y.: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. & Kaplan, R. (Eds.). (1978).Humanscape: Environments for people. North Scituate, MA: Duxbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kates, R.W. (1962)Hazard and choice perception in flood plain management. (Research Paper No. 78). University of Chicago: Department of Geography.

  • Katz, D. (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes.Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. & Folkman, S. (1984).Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R.S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition.American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R.J. (1967).Death in life: Survivors of Hiroshima. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R.J. & Falk, R. (1982).Indefensible weapons: The political and psychological case against nuclearism. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macy, J.R. (1983).Despair and personal power in the nuclear age. Philadelphia: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, J.G., & Olsen, J.P. (1979).Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Universitetsforlaget.

  • Merton, R.K. (1987). Three fragments from a sociologist's notebooks.Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mileti, D.S., Drabek, T.E., & Hass, J.E. (1975)Human systems in extreme environments: A sociological perspective. Boulder: Institute of Behavioural Science, University of Colorado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milgram, S. (1970). The experience of living in cities.Science, 167, 1461–1468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz, J.R. (1987). Usable knowledge, usable ignorance.Knowledge: Creation, Diffusion, Utilization, 9: 87–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J.P. (1980). The psychological reality of natural disasters. In J. Oliver (Ed.),Response to disaster. Townsville, Qld.: James Cook University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reser, J.P. (1984). Thinking the unthinkable: Impact of the filmThe Day After in the imageability of a nuclear holocaust. Palmerston North: New Zealand Psychological Society Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, R.R. (1981). On emotional responses to nuclear issues and terrorism. In R.R. Rogers et al. (Eds.),Psychological aspects of nuclear developments: Report of the task force on psychological aspects of nuclear developments of the American Psychiatric Association (pp. 11–24). Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schell, J. (1982).The fate of the earth. London: Pan Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A. (1957).Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. (1978). Rationality as process and as product of thought.American Economic Review, 68, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, J.H., & Bauman, D.D. (1983).Environment and behavior, 15, 165–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M. (1980). Interests and the growth of uncertainty.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 10, 157–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M. (1985). Toward a social theory of ignorance.Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 15, 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, M. (1987).Ignorance and uncertainty: Emerging paradigms. N.Y.: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. (1985)Psychological aspects of nuclear war. Chichester: British Psychological Society and John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • turner, B.A. (1978).Man-made disasters. London: Wykeham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice.Science.211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, M.B., Bruner, J.S., & White, R.W. (1956).Opinions and personality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner, R.V. (1985). Psychology and the threat of nuclear war.American psychologist, 40, 531–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C., & Laslett, B. (1977). Privacy and secrecy: A conceptual comparison.Journal of Social Issues, 33, 43–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R.K. (Ed.). (1986).Psychology and the prevention of nuclear war. New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklund, R.A. & Brehm, J.W. (1976).Perspectives on cognitive dissonance. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Joseph P. Reser is a senior lecturer in psychology at James Cook University of North Queensland, Australia, with research interests in a number of applied social psychology areas.

Michael J. Smithson is a senior lecturer in sociology, in the behavioral sciences department at James Cook University. His current research interests include the study of ignorance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reser, J.P., Smithson, M.J. When ignorance is adaptive: Not knowing about the nuclear threat. Knowledge in Society 1, 7–27 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737056

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02737056

Keywords

Navigation