Skip to main content
Log in

Tropical rain forest fragmentation and wild populations of primates at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In view of the extensive destruction, fragmentation, and conversion of primate habitats to anthropogenic vegetation, information on Neotropical primate ability to use a landscape consisting of forest fragments and agricultural habitats is necessary to understand the ecological flexibility of the species involved and it is of relevance to the design of conservation scenarios at the landscape level. We censused howlers and spider monkeys in 126 forest fragments and in 44 agricultural sites at Los Tuxtlas, southern Veracruz, Mexico, and used the IDRISI Geographic Information System to assess the extent of primate habitat remaining. We conducted economic surveys to assess the productivity of several systems of land management, including cattle ranching. Seventy- five percent of native habitat has been lost at Los Tuxtlas, 20% remains in the form of isolated fragments of vegetation, and only 5% consists of contiguous rain forest at high elevations (> 800 m). Howlers and spider monkeys were present in only 60 and 8% of the forest sites investigated, respectively, attesting to extensive local extinction. Populations of both species are small and found in a fragmented and isolated condition throughout the landscape. A large number of howlers were detected in artifactual habitats such as cacao, coffee and mixed (cacao and coffee) plantations shaded by rain forest trees. Residual rain forest vegetation along streams, rivers, and lakes facilitated the interfragment and interhabitat movement of howlers. Economic surveys showed that some of the agricultural habitats were more productive than cattle ranching. Conservation of spider monkeys requires large areas of contiguous forest, but only small areas are present at high elevations. Howlers are restricted to elevations < 800 m, where most of the forest has disappeared, but can apparently exist in a matrix of forest fragments, arboreal agricultural habitats, and pasture lands. Structural aspects of the vegetation and connectivity among habitat islands may be indispensable components of both landscape scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrén, H. (1994). Effects of habitat fragmentation on birds and mammals in landscapes with different proportions of suitable habitat: A review.Oikos 71: 355–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andren, H., and Angelstam, P. (1988). Elevated predation rates as an edge effect in habitat islands: Experimental evidence.Ecology 69: 544–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, M. (1995). Intensive rotational grazing.Jersey J. Oct.: 49–52.

  • Bicca-Marques, J. L., and Calegaro-Marques, C. (1994). Exotic plant species can serve as staple food sources for wild howler populations.Folia Primatol. 63: 209–211.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burkey, T. V. (1988). Extinction in nature reserves: the effects of fragmentation and the importance of migration between reserve fragments.Oikos 55: 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassell, B. (1995). Genetic progress is not automatic.Hoard’s Dairyman 12: 1127–1128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, C. A. (1988). Patterns of foraging and range use by three species of Neotropical primates.Primates 29: 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirzo, R., and Garcia, M. C. (1992). Rates of deforestation in Los Tuxtlas, a neotropical area in southern Mexico.Consent. Biol. 6: 84–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A. (1984). Resource use by howler monkeys in the rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Veracruz, Mexico.Int. J. Primatol. 5: 105–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1984a). Fruit-eating and seed dispersal by howling monkeys in the tropical rain forest of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico.Am. J. Primatol 6: 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1984b). Some observations on the present distribution and conservation ofAlouatta andAteles in southern Mexico.Am. J. Primatol. 7: 133–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1986). Frugivory by howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata) at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico: Dispersal and fate of seeds. In Estrada, A., and Fleming T. H. (eds.),Frugivores and Seed Dispersal, W. Junk, The Hague, pp. 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1988). Tropical rain forest conversion and perspectives in the conservation of wild primates(Alouatta andAteles) in Mexico.Am. J. Primatol. 14: 315–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1993). Aspects of ecological impact of howling Monkeys(Alouatta palliata) on their habitat: a review. In Estrada, A., Rodriguez-Luna, E., Lopez-Wilchis, R., and Coates-Estrada, R. (eds.),Avances en Estudios Primatologicos en Mexico I, Asociación Mexicana de Primatología, A.C. y Patronatto Pro-Universidad Veracruzana, A.C. Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico, pp. 87–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., and Coates-Estrada, R. (1995).Las Selvas Tropicales Humedas de Mexico: Recurso Poderoso pero Vulnerable, Fondo de Cultura Economica, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R., and Martinez, M. (1985). La Estación de Biología Los Tuxtlas: un recurso para el estudio y conservación de las selvas del trópico hÚmedo en Mexico. In Arno, S., and Gomez-Pompa, A. (eds.),Regeneration de Selvas II, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones sobre Recursos Bioticos, Editorial Alhambra Mexicana, S.A. de C.V. Mexico, pp. 379–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R., Merrit, D., Jr., Montiel, S., and Curiel, D. (1993). Patterns of frugivore species richness and abundance in forest islands and in agricultural habitats at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. In Fleming, T. H., and Estrada, A. (eds.),Frugivores and Seed Dispersal: Ecological and Evolutionary Aspects, Kluwer Academic Group, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 245–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R., and Meritt, D., Jr. (1994). Non flying mammals and landscape changes in the tropical rain forest region of Los Tuxtlas, Mexico.Ecography.

  • Fitch, R. (1992). WinSTAT,The Statistics Program for Windows, Kalmia, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Chiarello, A. (1993a). Activity patterns of the brown howler monkeyAlouatta fusca, Geoffroyi 1812, in a forest fragment of Southeastern Brazil.Primates 34: 289–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia Chiarello, A. (1993b). Home range of the brown howler monkey(Alouatta fusca) in a forest fragment in southern Brazil.Folia Primatol. 60: 173–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galetti, M., Pedroni, F., and Morellato, L. P. C. (1994). Diet of the brown howler monkey (Alouatta fusca) in a forest fragment in southeastern Brazil.Mammalia 1: 111–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleissman, S. R., Garcia, R. and Amador, M. (1981). The ecological basis for the application of traditional agriculture technology in the management of tropical ecosystems.Agro-ecosystems 7: 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herr, C. M., and Reed, K. C. (1991). Micromanipulation of bovine embryos for sex determination.Theriogenology 35: 45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horwich, R., and Johnson, E. D. (1986). Geographic distribution of the black howler(Alouatta pigra) in Central America.Primates 27: 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. (1990). Avian survival rates and the extinction process on Barro Colorado Island, Panama.Conserv. Biol. 4: 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance, W. F. (1991). Edge effects in tropical forest fragments: Applications of a model for the design of nature reserves.Biol. Conserv. 57: 205–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, T. E., Bierregaard, R. O., Jr., Rylands, A. B., Malcom, J. R., Quintela, C. F., Harper, L. H., Brown, K. S., Powell, A. H., Powell, G. V. N., Schubart, H. O. R., and Hays, M. B. (1986). Edge and other effects of isolation on Amazon forest fragments. In Soule, M. E. (ed.),Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp. 257–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludwig, J. A., and Reynolds, J. F. (1988).Statistical Ecology, John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre, S., and Barret, G. W. (1992). Habitat variegation, an alternative to fragmentation.Conserv. Biol. 1: 146–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R. A., and Roosmalen, M. G. M. (1981). Preliminary observations on habitat utilization and diet in eight Surinam monkeys.Folia Primatol. 36: 1–39.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morowitz, H. J. (1991). Balancing species preservation and economic considerations.Science 253: 752–754.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naiman, R. J., Decamps, H., and Pollock, M. (1993). The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity.Ecol. Appl. 3: 209–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. F. (1991). LanDscape connectivity: Different functions at different scales. In Hudson, W. E. (ed.),Landscape Linkages and Biodiversity, Island Press, Washington, DC, pp. 110–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orr, D. W. (1991). The economics of conservation.Conserv. Biol. 5: 439–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennington, T. D., and Sarukhan, J. (1968).Arboles Tropicales de Mexico, Instituto de Investigaciones Forestales, Mexico.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel, D., Stachow, U., Takacs, D. A., Brubaker, H. W., Dumas, A. R., Meaney, J. J., O’Neil, D., Onsi, E., and Corzilius D. B. (1992). Conserving biological diversity in agricultural/forestry systems.Bioscience 5: 354–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Luna, E., and Cortes-Ortiz, L. (1994). Translocación y seguimiento de un grupo de monos(Alouatta palliata) liberado en una isla (1988–1994).Neotrop. Primates 2: 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saunders, D.A., Hobbs, R. J., and Margulis, C. R. (1991). Biological consequences of ecosystem fragmentation: A review.Conserv. Biol. 5: 18–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske, D. W., and Brokaw, N. (1981). Treefalls and the distribution of understory birds in a tropical forest.Ecology 62: 938–945.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, M. L. (1987). Minimum viable populations: Coping with uncertainty. In Soule, M. E. (ed.),Viable Populations for Conservation, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terborgh, J. (1992). Maintenance of diversity in tropical forests.Biotropica 24: 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, E. S., Rico-Gray, V., and Chan, C. (1986). Monkeys of the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: Preliminary survey of their distribution and status.Primate Conserv. 7: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Estrada, A., Coates-Estrada, R. Tropical rain forest fragmentation and wild populations of primates at Los Tuxtlas, Mexico. Int J Primatol 17, 759–783 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735263

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02735263

Key words

Navigation