Abstract
Much of medical practice involves the exercise of such basic cognitive tasks as estimating probabilities and synthesizing information. Scientists studying cognitive processes have identified impediments to accurate performance on these tasks. Together the impediments foster “cognitive bias.” Five factors that can detract from accurate probability estimation and three that impair accurate information synthesis are discussed. Examples of all eight factors are illustrated by reference to published articles. The authors suggest ways to minimize the negative influences of these factors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Elstein AS. Clinical judgment: psychological research and medical practice. Science 1976;194:696–700
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 1974;185:1124–31
Tversky A, Kahneman D. Availability: a heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychol 1973;5:207–32
Detmer DE, Fryback DG, Gassner K. Heuristics and biases in medical decision-making. J Med Educ 1978;53:682–3
Ederer F. Serum cholesterol changes: effects of diet and regression toward the mean. J Chronic Dis 1972;25:277–89
Einhorn HJ, Hogarth RM. Confidence in judgment: the persistence of the illusion of validity. Psychol Rev 1978;85:395–416
Bushyhead JB, Christensen-Szalanski JJ. Feedback and the illusion of validity in a medical clinic. Med Decis Making 1981;1:115–23
Arkes HR, Wortmann RL, Saville P, Harkness AR. The hindsight bias among physicians weighting the likelihood of diagnoses. J Appl Psychol 1981;66:252–4
Bell DE. Regret in decision making under uncertainty. Oper Res 1982;30:961–81
Wallsten TS. Physician and medical student bias in evaluating diagnostic information. Med Decis Making 1981;1:145–64
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. Evaluation of a computerized Bayesian model for diagnosis of renal cyst vs tumor vs normal variant from excretory urogram information. Invest Radiol 1976;11:102–11
Eddy DM. Probabilistic reasoning in clinical medicine: problems and opportunities. In Kahneman D, Slovic P, Tversky A (Eds). Judgment and uncertainty: heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1982;249–67
Christensen-Szalanski JJJ, Bushyhead JB. Physicians’ misunderstanding of normal findings. Med Decis Making 1983;3:169–75
Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981;211:453–8
McNeil BJ, Pauker SG, Sox HC, Tversky A. On the elicitation of preferences for alternative therapies. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1259–62
Weinstein MC, Fineberg HV, Elstein AS, et al. Clinical decision analysis. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders, 1980;178–9
Fryback DG, Thornbury JR. Informal use of decision theory to improve radiological patient management. Radiology 1978;129:385–8
Koriat A, Lichtenstein S, Fischhoff B. Reasons for confidence. J Exp Psychol: Hum Learn Mem 1980;6:107–18
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received from the Department of Medicine. Case Western Reserve University, Division of General Internal Medicine at Cleveland Metropolitan General Hospital, Cleveland, Ohio, and the Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dawson, N.V., Arkes, H.R. Systematic errors in medical decision making:. J Gen Intern Med 2, 183–187 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596149
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02596149