Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of sentinel node mapping in patients with colon cancer

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Annals of Surgical Oncology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping techniques have been validated in breast cancer and melanoma. This study summarizes our experience with SLN mapping for colon cancer.

Methods

Fifty-five patients with colon cancer underwent intraoperative SLN mapping. One mL of 1% isosulfan blue was injected subserosally around the tumor. The first nodes highlighted with blue were identified as the SLNs. SLNs underwent multiple sectioning and immunohistochemical staining for cytokeratin. The overall learning curve was calculated.

Results

Lymphatic mapping adequately identified at least 1 SLN in 45 patients (82%). SLNs adequately predicted regional status in 44 of 45 (98%) cases. In 9 of 45 cases (20%), the SLNs were the only sites of metastases. Among the 14 cases that were SLN positive, 6 of 55 patients (11%) were positive only by immunohistochemistry. Of the 31 cases with negative SLNs, 1 case had a 3.5-mm pericolonic tumor-replaced non-SLN (3% false-negative rate). The overall learning curve stabilized after five cases.

Conclusions

Intraoperative SLN mapping is a feasible technique, with a quick learning curve, and had a reasonable SLN identification rate. Negative SLNs accurately predict the status of non-SLNs 97% of the time. Eleven percent of patients were upstaged by demonstration of micrometastases and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greenlee GT, Murray T, Bolden S, et al. Cancer statistics 2000.CA Cancer J Clin 2000;50:7–34.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lindmark G, Gerdin B. Prognostic predictors in colorectal cancer.Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:1219–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saha S, Weise D, Badin J, et al. Technical details of sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer and its impact on staging.Ann Surg Oncol 2000;7:120–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reintgen D, Cruse CW, Wells K, et al. The orderly progression of melanoma nodal metastases.Ann Surg 1994;220:759–67.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Morton DL, Chan AD. The concept of sentinel node lcoalization: how it started.Semin Nucl Med 2000;30:4–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Greenson JK, Isenhart CE, Rice R, et al. Identification of occult micrometastases in pericolic lymph nodes of Duke’s B colorectal cancer patients using monoclonal antibodies against cytokeratin and CC49: correlation with long-term survival.Cancer 1994;73: 563–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeffers MD, O’Dowd GM, Mulcahy H, et al. The prognostic significance of immunohistochemically detected lymph node micrometastasis in colorectal carcinoma.J Pathol 1994;172: 183–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Adell G, Boeryd B, Franlund B, et al. Occurrence and prognostic importance of micrometastases in regional lymph nodes in Dukes B colorectal carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study.Eur J Surg 1996;162:637–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tsioulias GJ, Wood TF, Morton DL, Bilchik AJ. Lymphatic mapping and focused analysis of sentinel lymph nodes upstage gastro-intestinal neoplasms.Arch Surg 2000;135:926–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Saha S, Nora D, Wong JH, Weise D. Sentinel lymph node mapping in colorectal cancer—a review.Surg Clin North Am 2000;80: 1811–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Morton DL, Wen DR, Wong JH, et al. Technical details of intra-operative lymphatic mapping for early stage melanoma.Arch Surg 1992;127:392–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Morton DL, Thompson JF, Essner R, et al. Validation of the accuracy of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph-adenectomy for early-stage melanoma: a multicentric trial.Ann Surg 1999;230:453–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer.Ann Surg 1994;220:391–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Krag DN, Weaver DI, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe.Surg Oncol 1993;2:335–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Giuliano A, Jones R, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer.J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2345–50.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Albertini J, Lyman G, Cox C, et al. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy in the patient with breast cancer.JAMA 1996;276:1818–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bilchik AJ, Giuliano A, Essner R, et al. Universal application of intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy in solid neoplasms.Cancer J Sci Am 1998;4:351–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Paramo JC, Summerall J, Wilson C, et al. Intraoperative sentinel lymph node mapping in patients with colon cancer.Am J Surg 2001;182:40–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fleming ID, Cooper JS, Henson DE, et al.AJCC Cancer Staging Handbook: From the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Fifth Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1998:81–9.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cohen AM, Kelsen D, Saltz L, et al. Adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer.Curr Probl Cancer 1998;22:5–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gusterson B. Are micrometastases clinically relevant?Br J Hosp Med 1992;47:247–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Broll R, Schauer V, Schimmelpenning H, et al. Prognostic relevance of occult tumor cells in lymph nodes of colorectal carcinomas.Dis Colon Rectum 1997;40:1465–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholson AG, Marks CG, Cook MG. Effect on lymph node status of triple leveling and immunohistochemistry with CAM 5.2 on node negative colorectal carcinomas.Gut 1994;35:1447–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Futamura M, Takagi Y, Koumura H, et al. Spread of colorectal cancer micrometastases in regional lymph nodes by reverse transcriptise-polymerase chain reactions for carcinoembryonic antigen and cytokeratin 20.J Surg Oncol 1998;68:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrera-Omelas L, Justiniano J, Castillo N, et al. Metastasis in small lymph nodes from colon cancer.Arch Surg 1987;122:1253–6.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Maamoun S, Weber TK, et al. Clinical significance of colorectal cancer: metastases in lymph nodes < 5 mm in size.Ann Surg Oncol 1996;3:124–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Weise DA, Saha S, Badin J. Sentinel lymph node mapping in staging of colorectal carcinoma (abstract).Am J Clin Pathol 1999; 112:542.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yamamoto Y, Takahashi K, Yasuno M, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of skipping lymph node metastases in patients with colorectal cancer.Jpn J Clin Oncol 1998;28:378–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wood TF, Tsioulias GJ, Mortan DL, et al. Focused examination of sentinel lymph nodes upstages early colorectal carcinoma.Am Surg 2000;66:998–1003.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Joosten JJA, Strobbe LJA, Wauters CAP, et al. Intraoperative lymphatic mapping and the sentinel node concept in colorectal carcinoma.Br J Surg 1999;86:482–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan C. Paramo MD.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Paramo, J.C., Summerall, J., Poppiti, R. et al. Validation of sentinel node mapping in patients with colon cancer. Annals of Surgical Oncology 9, 550–554 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573890

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02573890

Key Words

Navigation