Abstract
Estimating body weights for fossil primates is an important step in reconstructing aspects of their behavior and ecology. To date, the body size of Eocene euprimates—the Adapidae and Omomyidae—has been estimated only from molar area. Studies on other primates and mammals demonstrate that body weights estimated from teeth are not always concordant with those estimated from postcranial variables. We derive estimates for Eocene primates based on tarsal bone variables to compare with previously published values derived from dental measures. Stepsirhine-wide, family-level, and subfamily-level models are developed and compared. We also compare the accuracy and precision of dental- and tarsal-based regression models for predicting weight in extant species. Tarsal bone and dental area measures prove to be equally robust in predicting body weight; however, highly disparate estimates are often obtained from different variables. Equations based on lower-level taxonomic groups perform better than more widely based models. However, all equations considered yield fairly large errors, which can affect interpretations of paleoecology. The choice of the more robust prediction is not straightforward.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aiello, L. C. (1981). The allometry of primate body proportions.Symp. Zool. Soc. Lond. 48: 331–358.
Baskerville, G. L. (1972). Use of logarithmic regression in the estimation of plant biomass.Can. J. Forestry Res. 2: 49–53.
Bauchot, R., and Stephan, H. (1964). Donnees nouvelles sur l'encephalisation des Insectivores et des Prosimiens.Mammalia 30: 160–196.
Beauchamp, J. J., and Olson, J. S. (1973). Corrections for bias in regression estimates after logarithmic transformation.Ecology 54: 1403–1407.
Calder, W. A. (1984).Size, Function and Life History, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Conroy, C. C. (1987). Problems of body-weight estimation of fossil primates.Int. J. Primatol. 8: 115–138.
Covert, H. H. (1985).The Adaptions and Evolutionary Relationships of the Eocene Primate Subfamily Notharctinae, Ph.D. dissertation, Duke University, Durham, N.C.
Covert, H. H. (1986). Biology of Early Cenozoic primates. In Swindler, D. S. (ed.),Comparative Primate Biology, Vol. 1, Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 335–359.
Dagosto, M. (1986).The Joints of the Tarsus in the Strepsirhine Primates, Ph.D. dissertation, City University of New York, New York.
Damuth, J., and MacFadden, B. J. (1990).Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Demes, B., and Jungers, W. L. (1989). Functional differentiation of long bones in lorises.Folia primatol. 52: 58–69.
Fleagle, J. G. (1978). Size distributions in living and fossil primate faunas.Paleobiology 4: 67–76.
Fleagle, J. G. (1985). Size and adaptation in primates. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 1–20.
Gebo, D. L. (1988). Foot morphology and locomotor adaptation in Eocene primates.Folia Primatol. 50: 3–41.
Gebo, D. L., Dagosto, M., and Rose, K. D. (1991). Foot morphology and evolution of early EoceneCantius.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 86: 51–73.
Gingerich, P. D. (1981). Early Cenozoic Omomyidae and the evolutionary history of the tarsilform primates.J. Hum. Evol. 10: 345–374.
Gingerich, P. D. (1990). Prediction of body mass in mammalian species from long bone lengths and diameters.Contrib. Mus. Paleontol. Univ. Mich. 28: 79–92.
Gingerich, P. D., Smith, B. H., And Rosenberg, K. (1982). Allometric scaling in the dentition of primates and prediction of body weight from tooth size in fossils.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 1982: 81–100.
Gregory, W. K. (1920). On the structure and relations ofNotharctus, an American Eocene primate.Mem. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 3: 51–243.
Jungers, W. L. (1985a).Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York.
Jungers, W. L. (1985b). Body size and scaling of limb proportions in primates. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 345–382.
Jungers, W. L. (1988a). Lucy's length: Stature reconstruction inAustralopithecus afarensis (A.L.288-1) with implications for other small-bodied hominids.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 76: 227–231.
Jungers, W. L. (1988b). Relative joint size and hominid locomotor adaptations with implications for the evolution of hominid bipedalism.J. Hum. Evol. 17: 247–265.
Jungers, W. L. (1990). Problem and methods in reconstructing body size in fossil primates. In Damuth, J., and MacFadden, B. J. (eds.),Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 103–118.
Kay, R. F. (1975). The functional adaptations of primate molar teeth.Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 43: 195–216.
Kay, R. F., and Simons, E. (1980). The ecology of Oligocene African Anthropoidea.Int. J. Primatol. 1: 21–37.
La Barbera, M. (1989). Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution.Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 97–117.
MacPhee, R. D. E., and Jacobs, L. L. (1986).Nycticeboides simpsoni and the morphology adaptations, and relationships of Miocene Siwalik Lorisidae. In Flanagan, K. M., and Lillegraven, J. A. (eds.),Vertebrates, Phylogeny, and Philosophy: contributions to Geology, University of Wyoming, Special Paper 3, pp. 131–162.
Martin, R. D. (1982). Adaptation and body size in primates.Z. Morph. Anthropol. 71: 115–124.
Meier, B., Albiganac, R., Perrieras, A., Rumpler, Y., and Wright, P. C. (1987). A new species ofHapalemur (Primates) from Southeast Madagascar.Folia Primatol. 48: 211–215.
Montogomery, D. C., and Peck, E. A. (1982).Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York.
Nash, L. T., Bearder, S. K., and Olson, T. R. (1989). Synopsis ofGalago species characteristics.Int. J. Primatol. 10: 57–80.
Peters, R. H. (1983).The Ecological Implications of Body Size, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Radinsky, L. (1982). Some cautionary notes on making inferences about relative brain size. In Amstrong, E., and Falk, D. (eds.),Primate Brain Evolution, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 29–37.
Ruff, C. (1987). Structural allometry of the femur and tibia in Hominoidea andMacaca.Folia Primatol. 48: 9–49.
Ruff, C. (1988). Hindlimb articular surface allometry in Hominoidea andMacaca, with comparison to diaphyseal scaling.J. Hum. Evol. 17: 687–714.
Ruff, C. (1990). Body mass and hindlimb bone cross-sectional and articular dimensions in anthropoid primates. In Damuth, J., and MacFadden, B. J. (eds.),Body Size in Mammalian Paleobiology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 119–150.
Ruff, C., Walker, A., and Teaford, M. F. (1989). Body mass, sexual dimorphism, and femoral proportions ofProconsul from Rusinga and Mfangano Islands, Kenya.J. Hum. Evol. 18: 515–536.
Schmidt-Nielsen, K. (1984).Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Scott, K. M. (1983). Prediction of body weight of fossil Artiodactyla.Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 77: 199–215.
Simons, E. L. (1988). A new species ofPropithecus (Primates) from Northeast Madagascar.Folia Primatol. 50: 143–151.
Simpson, G. G., Roe, A., and Lewontin, R. C. (1960).Quantitative Zoology, Harcourt, Brace, and World, New York.
Smith, R. J. (1984). Allometric scaling in comparative biology: Problems of concept and method.Am. J. Physiol. 246: R152–160.
Smith, R. J. (1985). The present as a key to the past: Body weight of Miocene hominoids as a test of allometric methods for paleontological inferences. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 437–448.
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. (1981).Biometry, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.
Sprugel, D. G. (1983). Correcting for bias in long-transformed allometric equations.Ecology 64: 209–210.
Steudel, K. (1985). Allometric perspectives on fossil catarrhine morphology. In Jungers, W. L. (ed.),Size and Scaling in Primate Biology, Plenum Press, New York, pp. 449–475.
Swartz, (1989). The functional morphology of weight bearing: Limb joint surface area allometry in anthropoid primates.J. Zool. Lond. 218: 441–460.
Szalay, F. S. (1976). Systematics of the Omomyidae (Tarsiiformes, Primates).Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 156: 157–450.
Tattersall, I. (1982).The Primates of Madagascar, Columbia University Press, New York.
Wilson, J. M., Stewart, P. D., Ramangason, G.-S., Denning, A. M., and Hutchings, M. S. (1989). Ecology and conservation of the crowned lemur,Lemur coronatus, at Ankarana, N. Madagascar,Folia Primatol. 52: 1–26.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dagosto, M., Terranova, C.J. Estimating the body size of eocene primates: A comparison of results from dental and postcranial variables. International Journal of Primatology 13, 307–344 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547818
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02547818