Skip to main content
Log in

Supercritical CO2 degumming and physical refining of soybean oil

  • Published:
Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society

Abstract

A hexane-extracted crude soybean oil was degummed in a reactor by counter-currently contacting the oil with supercritical CO2 at 55 MPa at 70°C. The phosphorus content of the crude oil was reduced from 620 ppm to less than 5 ppm. Degummed feedstocks were fed (without further processing,i.e., bleaching) directly to a batch physical refining step consisting of simultaneous deacidification/deodorization (1 h @ 260°C and 1–3 mm Hg) with and without 100 ppm citric acid. Flavor and oxidative stability of the oils was evaluated on freshly deodorized oils both after accelerated storage at 60°C and after exposure to fluorescent light at 7500 lux. Supercritical CO2-processed oils were compared with a commercially refined/bleached soybean oil that was deodorized under the same conditions.

Flavor evaluations made on noncitrated oils showed that uncomplexed iron lowered initial flavor scores of both the unaged commercial control and the CO2-processed oils. Oils treated with .01% (100 ppm) citric acid had an initial flavor score about 1 unit higher and were more stable in accelerated storage tests than their uncitrated counterparts. Supercritical CO2-processed oil had equivalent flavor scores, both initially and after 60°C aging and light exposure as compared to the control soybean oil. Results showed that bleaching with absorbent clays may be eliminated by the supercritical CO2 counter-current processing step because considerable heat bleaching was observed during deacidification/deodorization. Colors of salad oils produced under above conditions typically ran 3Y 0.7R.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tandy, D.C., and W.J. McPherson,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 61:1253 (1984).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sullivan, F.E., Ibid.358 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beal, R.E., E.B. Lancastar and O.L. Brekke, Ibid.619 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. List, G.R., C.D. Evans, L.T. Black and T.L. Mounts, Ibid.275 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. List, G.R., T.L. Mounts, K. Warner and A.J. Heakin, Ibid.277 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. List, G.R., T.L. Mounts and A.J. Heakin, Ibid.280 (1978).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayes, L., and H. Wolff, Ibid.440 (1956).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Brafie, B.,Chem. Ind.:1152 (1958).

  9. Ohlsen, R., and C. Svensson,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 53:8 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stahl, E.,Fette Seifen. Anstrichm. 84:444 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. List, G.R., and J.A. Friedrich,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 62:82 (1985).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Taniguichi, M., T. Tsuji, M. Shibata and T. Kobayashi,Agric. Biol. Chem. 49:2367 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodrum, J.W., and M.B. Kilgo,Enger. Agric. 6:265 (1987).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Eggers, R., and U. Sievers,J. Chem. Eng. Japan 22:641 (1989).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. List, G.R., and J.P. Friedrich,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 66:98 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  16. List, G.R., J.P. Friedrich and J.W. King,Oil Mill Gazetteer 95:28 (1989).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dakovic, S., J. Turkulov and E. Dimic,Fat Sci. Technol. 91:116 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fors, S.M., and C.E. Eriksson,Lebensm. Wiss. Technol. 23:390 (1990).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Favati, F., J.W. King and M. Mazzanti,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 68:422 (1991).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Eggers, R., and V.C. Wilp,Fat. Sci. Technol. 93:348 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bitner, E.D., J.P. Friedrich and T.L. Mounts,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 63:338 (1986).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedrich, J.P., G.R. List and G.F. Spencer, inSeventh International Conference on Jojoba and Its Uses, edited by A.R. Baldwin, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1989, pp. 165–173.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Schwab, A.W., and H.J. Dutton, Ibid.57 (1948).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Moulton, K.J., Ibid.302 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Official Methods and Recommended Practices of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, edited by D. Firestone, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Warner, K., E.N. Frankel and T.L. Mounts,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 66:558 (1989).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Warner, K., inFlavor Chemistry of Fats and Oils, edited by D. Min and T. Smouse, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1985, pp. 207–222.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Warner, K.,Assessment of Fat and Oil Quality in Analysis of Fats, Oils and Lipoproteins, American Oil Chemists’ Society, Champaign, 1991, pp. 344–386.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Moser, H.A., C.D. Evans, J.C. Cowan and W.F. Kwolek,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 42:30 (1965).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Friedrich, J.P., U.S. Patent 4,466,923 (1984).

  31. Friedrich, J.P., G.R. List and A.J. Heakin,J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 50:288 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

About this article

Cite this article

List, G.R., King, J.W., Johnson, J.H. et al. Supercritical CO2 degumming and physical refining of soybean oil. J Am Oil Chem Soc 70, 473–476 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542578

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02542578

Key words

Navigation