Skip to main content
Log in

Size- and locomotion-related aspects of hominid and anthropoid pelves: An osteometrical multivariate analysis

  • Published:
Human Evolution

Abstract

Two multivariate methods — the logarithmic principal component analysis (LPCA), and the logarithmic factorial analysis (LFA) — have been used tocompare the hip bone proportions of hominoids biometrically. The results have shown that size effects among apes and hominids interact to a centain extent with locomotor specializations, which are related to the attainment of more or less terrestrial behaviors.

The pelvic morphology of great apes (Pongo, Pan, Gorilla) has retained numerous morphological traits — such as a gracile and elongated hip bone —, which were inherited from common adaptations to arboreal locomotion. In spite of these common traits, the African pongids (Pan, Gorilla) present two very different pelvic morphologies corresponding to two adaptative modes of terrestrial quadrupedalism.

The hip bone of humans is proportionnally short and robust, most particularly at the level of its axial part. These characteristics, as well as the whole pelvic proportions, clearly indicate that gravitational forces exert a strong pressure on the pelvic walls during bipedalism. Among hominids, the transition from an australopithecine-like pelvic pattern to a human-like one corresponds to an increase of loading constraints on the hip jiont. This seems to indicate an evident change in locomotor behavior. Progression apparently became exclusively terrestrial with the genusHomo.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alexander R. McN., 1977.Allometry of the limbs of antelopes (Bovidae). J. Zool. Lond., 183: 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R. McN., 1985a.Body support, scaling and allometry. In: Functional Vertebrate Morphology. M. Hildebrand, D.M. Bramble, K.F. Liem, D.B. Wake eds., pp. 26–36, Harvard University Press, Cambridge & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R. McN., 1985b.Body size and limb design in primates and other mammals. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. W.L. Jungers ed., pp. 337–344. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R. McN., Jayes A.S., Maloiy G.M.O. &Wathuta E.M., 1979.Allometry of the limb bones of mammals from shrews (Sorex)to elephant (Loxodonta). J. Zool. Lond., 189: 305–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander R. McN., Jayes A.S., Maloiy G.M.O. &Wathuta E.M., 1981.Allometry of the leg muscles of mammals. J. Zool. Lond. 194: 539–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge Ch., 1984.Multivariate analysis of the pelvis for hominids and other extant primates: Implications for the locomotion and systematics of the different species of australopithecines. J. Human Evol., 13: 555–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berge Ch. &Kazmierczak J.-B., 1986.Effects of size and locomotor adaptations of the hominid pelvis: Evaluation of australopithecine bipedality with a new multivariate method. Folia Primatol., 46: 185–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berge Ch., &Ponge J.-F., 1983.Les caractéristiques du bassin des Australopithèques sont-elles liées à une bipédie de type humain? Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 10: 335–354.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corruccini R.S., 1983.Principal components for allometric analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 139–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei G., 1938.Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienzie… (Trattato del Movimento). Elzevir, Leyden. (French transl. by M. Clavelin, 1970, Armand Colin, Paris).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hills M., 1982.Bivariate versus multivariate allometry: A note on a paper by Jungers and German. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 321–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J. S., 1932.Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huxley J. S. &Teissier G., 1936.Terminology of relative growth. Nature, 137: 780–781.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur P., 1963a.The degree of generality of robustness in Martes americana. Growth, 27: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolicoeur P., 1963b.The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics, 19: 497–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers W.L., 1985.Body size and scaling of limb proportions in primates. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. W.L. Jungers ed., pp. 345–381. Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungers W.L. &German R.Z., 1981.Ontogenetic and interspecific skeletal allometry in nonhuman primates: Bivariate versus multivariate analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 55: 195–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers W.L., Cole T.M. III &Owsley D.W., 1988.Multivariate analysis of relative growth in the limb bones of Arikara Indians. Growth, Development & Aging, 52: 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazmierczak J.-B., 1985.Analyse logarithmique: Deux exemples d'application. Rev. Stat. Appl., 33: 13–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry H.M. &Corruccini R.S., 1975.Multivariate analysis of early hominid pelvic bones. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 43: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMahon T.A., 1973.Size and shape in biology. Science, 179: 1201–1204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.T., 1972.Early hominid posture and locomotion. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago & London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea B.T., 1986.Scapula form and locomotion in chimpanzee evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 70: 475–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern J.T., Jr. &Susman R.L., 1983.The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 60: 279–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steudel K., 1982a.Patterns of intraspecific and interspecific allometry in Old World primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 419–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steudel K., 1982b.Allometry and adaptation in the catarrhine postcranial skeleton. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 431–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Susman R.L., Stern J.T., Jr. &Jungers W.L., 1984.Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids. Folia Primatol. 43: 113–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teissier G., 1948.La relation d'allometrie, sa signification statistique et biologique. Biometrics, 4: 14–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berge, C. Size- and locomotion-related aspects of hominid and anthropoid pelves: An osteometrical multivariate analysis. Hum. Evol. 6, 365–376 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435530

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435530

Key words

Navigation