Abstract
Two multivariate methods — the logarithmic principal component analysis (LPCA), and the logarithmic factorial analysis (LFA) — have been used tocompare the hip bone proportions of hominoids biometrically. The results have shown that size effects among apes and hominids interact to a centain extent with locomotor specializations, which are related to the attainment of more or less terrestrial behaviors.
The pelvic morphology of great apes (Pongo, Pan, Gorilla) has retained numerous morphological traits — such as a gracile and elongated hip bone —, which were inherited from common adaptations to arboreal locomotion. In spite of these common traits, the African pongids (Pan, Gorilla) present two very different pelvic morphologies corresponding to two adaptative modes of terrestrial quadrupedalism.
The hip bone of humans is proportionnally short and robust, most particularly at the level of its axial part. These characteristics, as well as the whole pelvic proportions, clearly indicate that gravitational forces exert a strong pressure on the pelvic walls during bipedalism. Among hominids, the transition from an australopithecine-like pelvic pattern to a human-like one corresponds to an increase of loading constraints on the hip jiont. This seems to indicate an evident change in locomotor behavior. Progression apparently became exclusively terrestrial with the genusHomo.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander R. McN., 1977.Allometry of the limbs of antelopes (Bovidae). J. Zool. Lond., 183: 125–146.
Alexander R. McN., 1985a.Body support, scaling and allometry. In: Functional Vertebrate Morphology. M. Hildebrand, D.M. Bramble, K.F. Liem, D.B. Wake eds., pp. 26–36, Harvard University Press, Cambridge & London.
Alexander R. McN., 1985b.Body size and limb design in primates and other mammals. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. W.L. Jungers ed., pp. 337–344. Plenum Press, New York.
Alexander R. McN., Jayes A.S., Maloiy G.M.O. &Wathuta E.M., 1979.Allometry of the limb bones of mammals from shrews (Sorex)to elephant (Loxodonta). J. Zool. Lond., 189: 305–314.
Alexander R. McN., Jayes A.S., Maloiy G.M.O. &Wathuta E.M., 1981.Allometry of the leg muscles of mammals. J. Zool. Lond. 194: 539–552.
Berge Ch., 1984.Multivariate analysis of the pelvis for hominids and other extant primates: Implications for the locomotion and systematics of the different species of australopithecines. J. Human Evol., 13: 555–562.
Berge Ch. &Kazmierczak J.-B., 1986.Effects of size and locomotor adaptations of the hominid pelvis: Evaluation of australopithecine bipedality with a new multivariate method. Folia Primatol., 46: 185–204.
Berge Ch., &Ponge J.-F., 1983.Les caractéristiques du bassin des Australopithèques sont-elles liées à une bipédie de type humain? Bull. Mém. Soc. Anthropol. Paris, 10: 335–354.
Corruccini R.S., 1983.Principal components for allometric analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 139–149.
Galilei G., 1938.Discorsi e dimostrazioni matematiche intorno a due nuove scienzie… (Trattato del Movimento). Elzevir, Leyden. (French transl. by M. Clavelin, 1970, Armand Colin, Paris).
Hills M., 1982.Bivariate versus multivariate allometry: A note on a paper by Jungers and German. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 321–322.
Huxley J. S., 1932.Problems of Relative Growth. Methuen, London.
Huxley J. S. &Teissier G., 1936.Terminology of relative growth. Nature, 137: 780–781.
Jolicoeur P., 1963a.The degree of generality of robustness in Martes americana. Growth, 27: 1–27.
Jolicoeur P., 1963b.The multivariate generalization of the allometry equation. Biometrics, 19: 497–499.
Jungers W.L., 1985.Body size and scaling of limb proportions in primates. In: Size and Scaling in Primate Biology. W.L. Jungers ed., pp. 345–381. Plenum Press, New York.
Jungers W.L. &German R.Z., 1981.Ontogenetic and interspecific skeletal allometry in nonhuman primates: Bivariate versus multivariate analysis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 55: 195–202.
Jungers W.L., Cole T.M. III &Owsley D.W., 1988.Multivariate analysis of relative growth in the limb bones of Arikara Indians. Growth, Development & Aging, 52: 103–107.
Kazmierczak J.-B., 1985.Analyse logarithmique: Deux exemples d'application. Rev. Stat. Appl., 33: 13–24.
McHenry H.M. &Corruccini R.S., 1975.Multivariate analysis of early hominid pelvic bones. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 43: 263–270.
McMahon T.A., 1973.Size and shape in biology. Science, 179: 1201–1204.
Robinson J.T., 1972.Early hominid posture and locomotion. Univ. Chicago Press, Chicago & London.
Shea B.T., 1986.Scapula form and locomotion in chimpanzee evolution. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 70: 475–488.
Stern J.T., Jr. &Susman R.L., 1983.The locomotor anatomy of Australopithecus afarensis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 60: 279–317.
Steudel K., 1982a.Patterns of intraspecific and interspecific allometry in Old World primates. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 419–430.
Steudel K., 1982b.Allometry and adaptation in the catarrhine postcranial skeleton. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 59: 431–441.
Susman R.L., Stern J.T., Jr. &Jungers W.L., 1984.Arboreality and bipedality in the Hadar hominids. Folia Primatol. 43: 113–156.
Teissier G., 1948.La relation d'allometrie, sa signification statistique et biologique. Biometrics, 4: 14–49.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berge, C. Size- and locomotion-related aspects of hominid and anthropoid pelves: An osteometrical multivariate analysis. Hum. Evol. 6, 365–376 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435530
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02435530