Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mating patterns, mate choice, and birth season heterosexual relationships in free-ranging rhesus macaques

  • Published:
Primates Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Birth season adult heterosexual nonkin relationships of 50 free-ranging female rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) in two social groups at Cayo Santiago, Puerto Rico were examined using focal follow (289 hr) and ad lib data. Eighty-eight percent of subjects had at least one relationship characterized by particularly high frequencies of spatial proximity, grooming, or both. These were designated “friendships.” Males intervened in aggressive interactions more frequently on behalf of Friends than non-Friends. Female aggressive support of males was extremely rare. Higher-ranking males experienced more friendships than lower-ranking males. High-ranking females had higher-ranking Friends than low-ranking females. Older females had higher-ranking Friends than younger females. Females groomed high-ranking Friends more than they were groomed by them, whereas they groomed low-ranking Friends less than they were groomed by them. In one social group, high-ranking females were more likely than low-ranking females to groom their Friends more than they were groomed by them. Males were more responsible than females for spatial proximity maintenance in 9 of 14 Friend dyads for which sufficient data were available. Neither male nor female dominance rank affected responsibility for proximity maintenance in Friend dyads.

Eight of 24 females had friendships with males with whom they had completed copulations during their conception peri-ovulatory period of the preceding mating season. Two of 19 females completed peri-ovulatory copulations with Friends during the following mating season. Friendship was not correlated with either of two demonstrated female mate choice indicators: (1) proximity maintenance during estrus; or (2) cooperation with male “hip-grasp” courtship attempts. Males directed “muzzle-up” courtship signals at lower rates toward Friends than toward non-Friends.

These and other investigators' results indicate that (1) protection from aggression is the primary benefit to female rhesus macaques of birth season heterosexual relationships; (2) the most effective protectors are in greatest demand as Friends; and (3) friendship has no effect or an inhibitory effect on mate choice in this species. Benefits to males of friendships were not apparent from this study but may include coalitional support against lower-ranking males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altmann, J., 1974. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.Behaviour, 49: 227–265.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, S. A., 1962. A field study of the sociobiology of rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 102: 338–435.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R. &W. D. Hamilton, 1981. The evolution of cooperation.Science, 211: 1390–1396.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berard, J. D., 1990. Life history patterns of male rhesus macaques on Cayo Santiago. Ph.D. thesis diss., Univ. of Oregon, Oregon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————,P. Nürnberg, J. T. Epplen, &J. Schmidtke, 1993. Male rank, reproductive behavior, and reproductive success in free-ranging rhesus macaques.Primates, 34: 481–489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bercovitch, F. B., 1986. Male rank and reproductive activity in savanna baboons.Int. J. Primatol., 4: 201–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, I. S., 1976. Dominance, aggression and reproduction in primate societies.J. Theor. Biol., 60: 459–472.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J., 1969.Attachment and Loss. Hogarth Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catchpole, H. R. &G. van Wagenen, 1978. Reproduction in rhesus monkeys,Macaca mulatta. In:The Rhesus Monkey,G. H. Bourne (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 118–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapais, B., 1983a. Structure of the birth season relationship among adult male and female rhesus monkeys. In:Primate Social Relationships,R. A. Hinde (ed.), Blackwell Scientific Publ., Oxford, pp. 200–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1983b. Reproductive activity in relation to male dominance and the likelihood of ovulation in rhesus monkeys.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 12: 215–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1986. Why do adult male and female rhesus monkeys affiliate during the birth season? In:The Cayo Santiago Macaques,R. G. Rawlins &M. J. Kessler (eds.), SUNY Press, Albany, New York, pp. 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M., 1988.Primate Social Systems. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, T. P., 1981. Reproductive behavior in the rhesus monkey: social and endocrine variables.Amer. Zoologist, 21: 185–195.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gouzoules, S. &H. Gouzoules, 1987. Kinship. In:Primate Societies,B. B. Smuts,D. L. Cheney,R. M. Seyfarth,R. W. Wrangham, &T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 299–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T. R., 1983. The study of mate choice. In:Mate Choice,P. Bateson (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. A., 1987. Social relationships between adult male and female rhesus macaques: I. sexual consortships.Primates, 28: 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1990. Social relationships between adult male and female rhesus macaques: II. non-sexual affiliative behaviour.Primates, 31: 33–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. &S. Atkinson, 1970. Assessing the roles of social partners in maintaining mutual proximity as exemplified by mother-infant relations in rhesus monkeys.Anim. Behav., 18: 169–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman, M. A., 1991a. Mate selection and partner preferences in female Japanese macaques. In:The Monkeys of Arashiyama: Thirty-five Years of Research in Japan and the West,L. M. Fedigan &P. J. Asquith (eds.), SUNY Press, New York, pp. 101–121.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1991b. History of the Arashiyama Japanese macaques in Kyoto, Japan. In:The Monkeys of Arashiyama: Thirty-five Years of Research in Japan and the West,L. M. Fedigan &P. J. Asquith (eds.), SUNY Press, New York, pp. 21–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1992. Influences of female partner preferences on potential reproductive outcome in Japanese macaques.Folia Primatol., 59: 77–88.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, J. P. &A. Rapoport, 1984.Theories of Coalition Formation. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, J. H., 1967. Social relationships of adult males in a free-ranging band of rhesus monkeys. In:Social Communication Among Primates,S. A. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 73–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maghsoodloo, S., 1975. Estimates of the quantiles of Kendall's partial rank correlation coefficient.J. Stat. Comp. Simul., 4: 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &L. Laszlo Pallos, 1981. Asymtotic behavior of Kendall's partial rank correlation coefficient and additional quantile estimates.J. Stat. Comp. Simul., 13: 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, I., P. K. Seth, &C. H. Southwick, 1984. Population growth of free-ranging rhesus monkeys at Tughlaqabad.Amer. J. Primatol., 7: 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, J. H., 1992. Measuring female mate choice in Cayo Santiago rhesus macaques.Anim. Behav., 44: 405–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1993. Sons of low-ranking female rhesus macaques can attain high dominance rank in their natal groups.Primates, 34: 285–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———— &S. E. Perry, 1993. Inbreeding avoidance in rhesus macaques: whose choice?Amer. J. Phys. Anthropol., 90: 335–344.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. D., A. F. Dixson, &E. J. Wickings (eds.), 1992.Paternity in Primates: Genetic Tests and Theories. Karger, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., 1982.Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melnick, D. J., M. C. Pearl, &A. F. Richard, 1984. Male migration and inbreeding avoidance in wild rhesus monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol., 7: 229–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noë, R., 1990. A veto game played by baboons: a challenge to the use of the Prisoner's Dilemma as a paradigm for reciprocity and cooperation.Anim. Behav., 39: 78–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orians, G. H., 1969. On the evolution of mating systems in birds and mammals.Amer. Naturalist, 103: 589–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ransom, T. W. &B. S. Ransom, 1971. Adult male-infant relationships among baboons (Papio anubis).Folia Primatol., 16: 179–195.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rawlins, R. G. &M. J. Kessler, 1986. The history of the Cayo Santiago colony. In:The Cayo Santiago Macaques,R. G. Rawlins &M. J. Kessler (eds.), SUNY Press, Albany, pp. 13–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sade, D. S., 1967. Determinants of dominance in a group of free-ranging rhesus monkeys. In:Social Communication Among Primates,S. A. Altmann (ed.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————,B. D. Chepko-Sade, J. M. Schneider, S. S. Roberts, &J. T. Richtsmeier, 1985.Basic Demographic Observations on Free-ranging Rhesus Monkeys, HRAF Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. F., 1993.Female Choices: Sexual Behavior of Female Primates. Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. G., 1981. The association between rank and reproductive success of male rhesus monkeys.Amer. J. Primatol., 1: 83–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smuts, B. B., 1985.Sex and Friendship in Baboons. Aldine, Hawthorne, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———— &R. W. Smuts, 1992. Male aggression and sexual coercion of females in nonhuman primates and other mammals: evidence and theoretical implications. In:Advances in the Study of Behavior, Vol. 22,P. J. B. Slater,J. S. Rosenblatt,M. Milinski,C. T. Snowdon (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolte, L. A. M., 1978. Pregnancy in the rhesus monkey. In:The Rhesus Monkey,G. H. Bourne (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 171–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strum, S., 1982. Agonistic dominance in baboons: an alternative view.Int. J. Primatol., 3: 175–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahata, Y., 1982a. Social relations between adult males and females of Japanese monkeys in the Arashiyama B troop.Primates, 23: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • ————, 1982b. The socio-sexual behavior of Japanese monkeys.Z. Tierpsychol., 59: 89–108.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L., 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism.Ouart. Rev. Biol., 46: 35–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vessey, S. H. &D. B. Meikle, 1987. Factors affecting social behavior and reproductive success of male rhesus monkeys.Int. J. Primatol., 8: 281–292.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, J. R. &R. M. Seyfarth, 1987. Conflict and cooperation. In:Primate Societies,B. B. Smuts,D. L. Cheney,R. M. Seyfarth,R. W. Wrangham, &T. T. Struhsaker (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Joseph H. Manson

    Present address: Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, 405 Hilgard Avenue, 90024-1553, Los Angeles, California, U. S. A.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Michigan, USA

    Joseph H. Manson

Authors
  1. Joseph H. Manson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Manson, J.H. Mating patterns, mate choice, and birth season heterosexual relationships in free-ranging rhesus macaques. Primates 35, 417–433 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381951

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02381951

Key Words

Search

Navigation