Skip to main content
Log in

Teaching for the development of reasoning

  • Published:
Research in Science Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is reasoning? Piaget and his collaborators have described a developmental and epistemological approach (Inhelder & Piaget, 1958). Information processing theorists describe mental activity in terms of conditions and “actions” called forth without further intermediate steps by these conditions, where “actions” may be overt behaviours or mental operations (Newell, 1973). To the classroom teacher, both of these points of view probably appear remote and theoretical, far from the comments, questions, insights, and misunderstandings exhibited by their students. This article, an abbreviated version of a longer presentation (Karplus, 1980), attempts to present an intermediate level of analysis, close enough to classroom occurences to be easily applied, but also sufficiently general to permit the linking of student behaviour with teaching strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADAPT.Multidisciplinary Piagetian-based programmes for college freshmen. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • BIGGS, E. Investigations and problem-solving in mathematical education. A.G. Howson (Ed.)Proceedings of the second international congress on mathematical education. London: Cambridge University Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • BRUNER, J.The process of education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  • CASE, R. Intellectual development and instruction; a neo-Piagetian view. In Lawson, A.E. (Ed.)The psychology of teaching for thinking and creativity. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC-SMEAC, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • COLLIS, K. A study of concrete and formal operations in school mathematics. Ph.D. thesis, University of Newcastle, N.S.W. 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • DIENES, Z.P.Building up mathematics. London: Hutchison Education, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • EAKIN, J. & KARPLUS, R. SCIS final report. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • GAGNE, R.The conditions of learning. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • INHELDER, B. & PIAGET, J.The growth of logical thinking from childhood to adolescence. New York: Basic Books, 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARPLUS, R. Teaching for the development of reasoning. In Lawson, A. E. (Ed.)The psychology of teaching for thinking and creativity. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC-SMEAC, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARPLUS, R., LAWSON, A.E., WOLLMAN, W.T., APPEL, M., BERNOFF, R., HOWE, A., RUSCH, J.J. & SULLIVAN, F.Science teaching and the development of reasoning. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California, 1977.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARPLUS, R. & LAWSON, C.A. SCIS teachers' handbook. Berkeley, Cal.: University of California, 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  • KARPLUS, R. & THIER, H.D.A new look at elementary school science. Chicago, Illinois: Rand McNally, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWSON, A.E. The development and validation of a classroom test of formal reasoning.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978, 15(1), 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWSON, A.E., BLAKE, A.J.D. & NORDLAND, F.H. Training effects and generalisation of the ability control variables in high school biology students.Science Education, 1975, 49, 387–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWSON, A.E. & WOLLMAN, W.T. Encouraging the transition from concerete to formal cognitive functioning—an experiment.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1976, 13, 413–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOVELL, K. Some aspects of the growth of the concept of a function. In Rosskopf, M., Steffe, L. & Tabac, s. (Eds.)Piagetian cognitive development research and mathematical education. Reston, VA: National Council of teachers of mathematics, 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • LOVELL, K. & BUTTERWORTH, I.B. Abilities underlying the understanding of proportionality.Mathematics Teaching, 1966, 37, 5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • LUNZER, E.A. Problems of formal reasoning in test situations. In Mussen, P.H. (Ed.)European Research in cognitive development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development (2, Whole No. 100), 1965, 18–46.

  • LUNZER, E.A. Formal reasoning: A reappraisal. In Presseisen, B.Z., Goldstein, D. & Appel, M.H. (Eds.)Topics in cognitive development, Vol. 2. New York: Plenum Press, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • LUNZER, E.A. & PUMFREY, P.D. Understanding proportionality.Mathematics Teaching, 1966, 34, 7–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • NEWELL, A. Production systems: Models of control structures. In Chase, W.G. (Ed.)Visual information processing. New York: Academic Press, 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCIENCE CURRICULUM IMPROVEMENT STUDY. Chicago, Ill.: Rand MacNally, 1970–74.

  • THIER, H.D., KARPLUS, R., KNOTT, R., LAWSON, C.A. & MONTGOMERY, M.Rand McNally SCIS, Chicago, Ill.: Rand McNally, 1977–1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLLMAN, W.T. & KARPLUS, R. Intellectual development beyond elementary school V: Using ratio in differing tasks.School Science and Mathematics, 1974, 74, 593–613.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOLLMAN, W.T. & LAWSON, A.E. The influence of instruction on proportional reasoning of seventh graders.Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 1978, 15(3), 227–232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Karplus, R. Teaching for the development of reasoning. Research in Science Education 10, 1–9 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356303

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356303

Keywords

Navigation