Skip to main content
Log in

Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior

  • Papers
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Repeatability, a concept derived from quantitative genetics theory, is a statistic that describes the degree to which variation within individuals contributes to total variation in a population. Its usual application has been to set an upper limit on heritability but it may also be useful for studies of stereotypy of behavior. The repeatability of the production of male mating signals gives information both about whether males differ sufficiently for selection to act and whether the differences could be appreciably heritable. Measures of the repeatability of female mating preferences will provide data that can describe the preference functions used in mathematical models of the evolution of sexually selected traits, as well as putting an upper bound on the heritability of preferences. A survey of the few measures in the literature shows that the repeatability of male signal production varies substantially (range 0.21–0.85) and does not necessarily reflect heritability. The repeatabilities of female preferences have not been published previously: for the response to conspecific pheromones by female flour beetles (Tribolium castaneum), my best estimate is zero. Measuring the repeatability of other traits such as parental care and foraging behavior may also lead to insights about selection on and the evolution of these traits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, S. J. (1981) Behavioral variation in natural populations. II. The inheritance of a feeding response in crosses between geographic races of the garter snake,Thamnophis elegans.Evolution 35, 510–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, T. C. M. (1986) Aggressiveness in sticklebacks (Gasteroesteus aculeatus L.): a behaviour—genetic study.Behaviour 98, 1–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boag, P. T. (1983) The heritability of external morphology in Darwin's ground finches (Geospiza) on Isla Daphne Major, Galapagos.Evolution 37, 877–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boake, C. R. B. (1986) A method for testing adaptive hypotheses of mate choice.Amer. Natur. 127, 654–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradbury, J. W. and Andersson, M. B. (eds) (1987)Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. Dahlem Konferenzen. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butlin, R. K. and Hewitt, G. M. (1986) Heritability estimates for characters under sexual selection in the grasshopper,Chorthippus brunneus.Anim. Behav. 34, 1256–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth, B. (1987) The heritability of fitness.Sexual Selection: Testing the Alternatives. J. W. Bradbury and M. B. Andersson (eds), pp. 21–40. Dahlem Konferenzen. John Wiley, Chichester, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, J.-W., Lofstedt, C. and Lofqvist, J. (1987) Repeatability of pheromone emissions from individual female ermine mothsYponomeuta padellus andYponomeuta rorellus.J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1431–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D. S. (1981)Introduction to Quantitative Genetics, 2nd edn. Longman, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, C. S. and Cooke, F. (1983) Genetic and environmental components of clutch size variance in a wild population of lesser snow geese (Anser caerulescens caerulescens).Evolution 37, 724–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R. A. (1958)The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection, 2nd edn. Dover, NY, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhardt, H. C. (1982) Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): Implications for mate choice.Amer. Zool. 22, 581–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, R. M. and Bradbury, J. W. (1985) Sexual selection in lekking sage grouse: phenotypic correlates of mating success.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 18, 117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, A. V. (1986) Female preferences for male calling bout duration in a field cricket.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 19, 73–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hedrick, A. V. (1988) Female choice and the heritability of attractive male traits: an empirical study.Amer. Natur. 132, 267–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, I. L. (1984) A quantitative genetic model for the origin of mating preferences.Evolution 38, 1283–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Heisler, I. L. (1985) Quantitative genetic models of female choice based on ‘arbitrary’ male characters.Heredity 55, 187–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoy, R. R., Pollack, G. S. and Moiseff, A. (1982) Species-recognition in the field cricket,Teleogryllus oceanicus: behavioral and neural mechanisms,Amer. Zool. 22, 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. (1985) Evolution of female choice and male parental investment in polygynous species: the demise of the ‘sexy son’.Amer. Natur. 125, 788–810.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, M. (1986) The handicap mechanism of sexual selection does not work.Amer. Natur. 127, 222–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1976) Natural selection and random genetic drift in phenotypic evolution.Evolution 30, 314–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande, R. (1981) Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits.Pr. Nat. Acad. Sci., US 78, 3721–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessells, C. M. and Boag, P. T. (1987) Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake.Auk 104, 116–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. E. (1966) Studies on the flash communication system inPhotinus fireflies.Misc. Publs. Mus. Zool. Univ. Mich. 130, 1–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, L., Dodd, P. W. D. and Fentress, J. C. (1985) The pooling fallacy: problems arising when individuals contribute more than one observation to the data set.Z. Tierpsychol. 68, 201–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mather, K. and Jinks, J. L. (1971)Biometrical Genetics. Chapman and Hall, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. (1978)The Evolution of Sex. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R., DeFries, J. C. and McClearn, G. E. (1980)Behavioral Genetics: A Primer, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schoener, T. W. (1987) A brief history of optimal foraging ecology.Foraging Behavior. A. C. Kamil, J. R. Krebs and H. R. Pulliam (eds), pp. 5–67. Plenum Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, H. B. and Lauder, G. V. (1985) Patterns of variation in aquatic ambystomatid salamanders: kinematics of the feeding mechanism.Evolution 39, 83–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, R. G. (1987) Maximum-likelihood approaches applied to quantitative genetics of natural populations.Evolution 41, 812–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R. and Rohlf, F. J. (1981)Biometry, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokolowski, M. B. (1986)Drosophila larval foraging behavior and correlated behaviors.Evolutionary Genetics of Invertebrate Behavior: Progress and Prospects. M. D. Huettel (ed.), pp. 197–213. Plenum Press, New York, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, R. (1983) Cryptic female choice and its implications in the scorpionflyHarpobittacus nigriceps.Amer. Natur. 122, 765–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Travis, J. and Woodward, B. D. (1989) Social context and courtship flexibility in male sailfin mollies,Poecilia Labipinna (Pisces: Poeciliidae). In PressAnim. Behav.

  • Walker, T. J. (1975) Effects of temperature on rates in poikilotherm nervous systems: evidence from the calling songs of meadow katydids (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae:Orchelimum) and reanalysis of published data.J. Comp. Physiol. 101, 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, A. (1988) The genetics of foraging behaviour: artificial selection for food choice in larvae of the fruitfly,Drosophila melanogaster.Anim. Behav. 36, 106–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, J. M., Vinson, W. E. and Pearson, R. E. (1981) Dairy cattle improvement and genetics.J. Dairy Sci. 64, 1305–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeh, D. W. (1987) Life history consequences of sexual dimorphism in a chernetid pseudoscorpion.Ecology 68, 1495–1501.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boake, C.R.B. Repeatability: Its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evol Ecol 3, 173–182 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270919

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02270919

Keywords

Navigation