Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of the effects of nicotine on a fixed rate and a subject-paced version of the rapid information processing task

  • Rapid Communication
  • Published:
Psychopharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In a modified “subject-paced” rather than fixed rate version of a rapid information processing (RIP) task, the presentation rate of the stimuli is continuously adapted to the individual performance level. Thus, this modified task version probably assesses a continuous “speed function” rather than mere “vigilance”. In order to compare the two task versions more directly, we carried out a study which assessed the effects of a regular nicotine cigarette and the nearly nicotine-free cigarette NEXT on both task versions under the same experimental conditions. The dominant alpha frequency pointed to a greater arousal evoked by the subject-paced RIP version compared with the fixed rate version. With the fixed rate version, smoking nicotine cigarettes reduced reaction times, whereas with the subject-paced version, processing rate was improved. Additionally, smoking NEXT decreased craving less than smoking the regular cigarettes. It was concluded that the two task versions are sensitive to different cognitive functions. Whereas the subject-paced version was more sensitive to effects on the speed of processing, the fixed rate version was more sensitive to effects on reaction time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakan P (1959) Extraversion-introversion and improvement in an auditory vigilance task. Br J Psychol 50:325–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldinger B, Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1995a) Switching to ultralow nicotine cigarettes: effects of different tar yields and nose blocking. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 50[2]:233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldinger B, Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1995b) Effects of smoking abstinence and nicotine abstinence on heart rate, activity and cigarette craving under field conditions. Hum Psychopharmacol 10:127–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Bättig K, Buzzi R (1986) Effect of coffee on the speed of subjectpaced information processing. Neuropsychobiology 16:126–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JA, Wesnes K, Warburton DM, Gale A (1985) Evidence of more rapid stimulus evaluation following cigarette smoking. Addic Behav 10:19–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Fagerström KO (1978) Measuring degree of physical dependence to tobacco smoking with reference to individualization of treatment. Addict Behav 3:235–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1993a) Effects of smoking on cognitive performance and physiological parameters as a function of smoking state. Hum Psychopharmacol 8:335–344

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1993b) Psychophysiological interactions between smoking and stress coping? Psychopharmacology 113:37–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1994a) Acute dose-effect relationships of caffeine and mental performance, EEG, cardiovascular and subjective parameters. Psychopharmacology 114:281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1994b) Pretask smoking and smoking during a task: effects on cognitive performance, puffing behavior, physiological and subjective parameters. Hum Psychopharmacol 9:181–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Michel C, Nil R, Bättig K (1989) Can smoking increase attention in rapid information processing during noise? Electrocortical, physiological and behavioral effects. Psychopharmacology 98:75–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Jaquet F, Aeschbach D, Bättig K (1991) Interactions of smoking and lunch with the effects of caffeine on cardiovascular functions and information processing. Hum Psychopharmacol 6[4]:277–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Baldinger B, Bättig K (1993a) Nicotine or tar titration in cigarette smoking behavior? Psychopharmacology 112:253–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Bunge A, Dal Pra G, Bättig K (1993b) Antagonistic effects of caffeine and alcohol on mental performance parameters. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 46:463–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasenfratz M, Buzzini P, Cheda P, Bättig K (1994) Temporal relationships of the effects of caffeine and alcohol on rapid information processing. Pharmacopsychoecologia 7:87–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacober A, Hasenfratz M, Bättig K (1995) Situation specific heart rate and motor activity during and between ad lib and paced cigarette smoking. Homeostasis (in press)

  • Koelega HS (1993) Stimulant drugs and vigilance performance: a review. Psychopharmacology 111:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel C, Bättig K (1989) Separate and combined psychophysiological effects of cigarette smoking and alcohol consumption. Psychopharmacology 97:65–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrie RXA, Deary IJ (1989) Smoking and human information processing. Psychopharmacology 99:393–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Warburton DM (1992) Nicotine as a cognitive enhancer. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 16:181–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1983) Effects of smoking on rapid information processing performance. Neuropsychophysiology 9:223–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1984a) Effects of scopolamine and nicotine on human rapid information processing performance. Psychopharmacology 82:147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesnes K, Warburton DM (1984b) The effects of cigarettes of varying yield on rapid information processing performance. Psychopharmacology 82:338–342

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Baldinger, B., Hasenfratz, M. & Bättig, K. Comparison of the effects of nicotine on a fixed rate and a subject-paced version of the rapid information processing task. Psychopharmacology 121, 396–400 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246080

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02246080

Key words

Navigation